Jump to content

Talk:Desert pupfish/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Bakerb4379 - "→‎GA Review: "
Bakerb4379 (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:
===Comments===
===Comments===
* First of all, this article should be at [[desert pupfish]]. General Wikipedia practice is to put fish articles at the common name in sentence case
* First of all, this article should be at [[desert pupfish]]. General Wikipedia practice is to put fish articles at the common name in sentence case
::Done
::-Requested
* Both [[:File:Male female mecularius.jpg]] and [[:File:Male macularius.jpg]] are marked as copyrighted images at their sources. Thus neither can be used on Wikipedia; you'll need to find images with free licenses. There are some [http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/species/?uid=28&ds=241 here]
* Both [[:File:Male female mecularius.jpg]] and [[:File:Male macularius.jpg]] are marked as copyrighted images at their sources. Thus neither can be used on Wikipedia; you'll need to find images with free licenses. There are some [http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/species/?uid=28&ds=241 here]
::-[[:File:Male female mecularius.jpg]] was uploaded with permission from the owner
::-[[:File:Male female mecularius.jpg]] was uploaded with permission from the owner
:::If this is so, then you must log the permission for using the image with OTRS. You'll find instructions for doing so at [[Wikipedia:COPYREQ]]. -- [[User:Yzx|Yzx]] ([[User talk:Yzx|talk]]) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
:::If this is so, then you must log the permission for using the image with OTRS. You'll find instructions for doing so at [[Wikipedia:COPYREQ]]. -- [[User:Yzx|Yzx]] ([[User talk:Yzx|talk]]) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::-Requested
::-[[:File:Male macularius.jpg]] was uploaded to encylopedia of life [http://eol.org/data_objects/19843406 link] under license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported), which is apparently acceptable to be uploaded to the commons
::-[[:File:Male macularius.jpg]] was uploaded to encylopedia of life [http://eol.org/data_objects/19843406 link] under license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported), which is apparently acceptable to be uploaded to the commons
:::Non-commercial (NC) images are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. See [[Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Copyright and licensing]]. -- [[User:Yzx|Yzx]] ([[User talk:Yzx|talk]]) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
:::Non-commercial (NC) images are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. See [[Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Copyright and licensing]]. -- [[User:Yzx|Yzx]] ([[User talk:Yzx|talk]]) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::-Noted.
* The IUCN status needs to be cited, and in any case the species doesn't seem to have been evaluated by the IUCN. It's not listed on the IUCN website
* The IUCN status needs to be cited, and in any case the species doesn't seem to have been evaluated by the IUCN. It's not listed on the IUCN website
::Status is detailed in [http://books.google.com/books?id=dyy0HilL9ecC&pg=PA230&lpg=PA230&dq=desert+pupfish+iucn&source=bl&ots=nECcSQNV1P&sig=2kWbEz9qBiOfXmAtSAXAKdWj2Is&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Ecd2Ur-hFsWcyQHWvYHYDQ&ved=0CFsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=desert%20pupfish%20iucn&f=false 1994 IUCN Redlist of Threatened Animals], but it does not show up on their current website. Is it acceptable to cite the book? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bakerb4379|Bakerb4379]] ([[User talk:Bakerb4379|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bakerb4379|contribs]]) 22:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::-Status is detailed in [http://books.google.com/books?id=dyy0HilL9ecC&pg=PA230&lpg=PA230&dq=desert+pupfish+iucn&source=bl&ots=nECcSQNV1P&sig=2kWbEz9qBiOfXmAtSAXAKdWj2Is&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Ecd2Ur-hFsWcyQHWvYHYDQ&ved=0CFsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=desert%20pupfish%20iucn&f=false 1994 IUCN Redlist of Threatened Animals], but it does not show up on their current website. Is it acceptable to cite the book? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bakerb4379|Bakerb4379]] ([[User talk:Bakerb4379|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bakerb4379|contribs]]) 22:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* The introduction does not adequately summarize the article; there's no mention of the fish's appearance or behavior, for example
* The introduction does not adequately summarize the article; there's no mention of the fish's appearance or behavior, for example
* ''teleost'' is jargony for the intro, I'd replace it with something like "bony fish" or "freshwater fish"
* ''teleost'' is jargony for the intro, I'd replace it with something like "bony fish" or "freshwater fish"
::-Done
* ''delta'' and ''basin'' should be linked
* ''delta'' and ''basin'' should be linked
::-Done
* ''There are natural populations of this fish remaining in California and Mexico, however, populations have been introduced to several areas and some fish are kept in private ponds and aquaria.'' -- this sentence should be integrated with the previous paragraph about range
* ''There are natural populations of this fish remaining in California and Mexico, however, populations have been introduced to several areas and some fish are kept in private ponds and aquaria.'' -- this sentence should be integrated with the previous paragraph about range
* The information about ponds/aquaria, and about the population decline since the 1900s needs to also be stated in the body of the article and cited
* The information about ponds/aquaria, and about the population decline since the 1900s needs to also be stated in the body of the article and cited
* "subspecies" should be linked
* "subspecies" should be linked
* ''C. eremus'' and ''C. arcuatus'' should be linked at their first occurrences
* ''C. eremus'' and ''C. arcuatus'' should be linked at their first occurrences
::-Done.
* ''the inconsistencies between haplotype frequency are highly significant and suggest species-divergence of about 100,000 years'' -- this is very technical language and should be rephrased to be more reader-friendly
* ''the inconsistencies between haplotype frequency are highly significant and suggest species-divergence of about 100,000 years'' -- this is very technical language and should be rephrased to be more reader-friendly
* ''Recently, the three subspecies have been classified as three distinct species: the desert pupfish (C. macularius), the Sonoyta (Quitobaquito) pupfish (C. eremus), and the Santa Cruz (Money Spring) pupfish (C. arcuatus)'' -- this sentence should come after the information about the mitochondrial DNA study, since it is a consequence of the study
* ''Recently, the three subspecies have been classified as three distinct species: the desert pupfish (C. macularius), the Sonoyta (Quitobaquito) pupfish (C. eremus), and the Santa Cruz (Money Spring) pupfish (C. arcuatus)'' -- this sentence should come after the information about the mitochondrial DNA study, since it is a consequence of the study
* Since this is a scientific article, all measurements should be given in metric units, with Imperial conversion in parentheses
* Since this is a scientific article, all measurements should be given in metric units, with Imperial conversion in parentheses
* ''have more vivid markings, specifically during breeding seasons'' -- the "specifically" is unnecessary, unless you mean "especially"
* ''have more vivid markings, specifically during breeding seasons'' -- the "specifically" is unnecessary, unless you mean "especially"
::-I do, and done.
* ''caudal peduncle'' should be linked
* ''caudal peduncle'' should be linked
* ''The profile of the desert pupfish is smoothly rounded'' -- I assume you mean the dorsal profile?
* ''The profile of the desert pupfish is smoothly rounded'' -- I assume you mean the dorsal profile?
::-Yes. Can you tell I'm new to fish? Done.
* ''tricuspid'' should be linked or explained
* ''tricuspid'' should be linked or explained
::-Done.
* The distribution map should specify that it's the US distribution, since it excludes Mexico
* The distribution map should specify that it's the US distribution, since it excludes Mexico
::-Done.
* The map caption shouldn't have ''C. macularius'' bolded
* The map caption shouldn't have ''C. macularius'' bolded
::-Done.
* ''salinity'', ''oxygen'', ''substrate'', ''benthic'', and ''algae'' should be linked
* ''salinity'', ''oxygen'', ''substrate'', ''benthic'', and ''algae'' should be linked
::-Done
* ''however, the desert pupfish has a smaller distribution than previously considered.'' -- awkward phrasing
* ''however, the desert pupfish has a smaller distribution than previously considered.'' -- awkward phrasing
* ''extant'' should be linked
* ''extant'' should be linked
::-Done
* ''omnivore'' should be linked
* ''omnivore'' should be linked
::-Done
* What is a "shallow zone"? Does this just mean shallow water or is it something more specific?
* What is a "shallow zone"? Does this just mean shallow water or is it something more specific?
::-Simply shallow water. Clarified.
* ''they will move out of the shallows during the day when water temperatures may rise to 36°C or higher'' -- is the temperature change the environmental cue for this behavior?
* ''they will move out of the shallows during the day when water temperatures may rise to 36°C or higher'' -- is the temperature change the environmental cue for this behavior?
* ''Rate of surface foraging'' -- should be "the rate"
* ''Rate of surface foraging'' -- should be "the rate"

Revision as of 22:59, 3 November 2013

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Yzx (talk · contribs) 17:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one. Comments to follow. -- Yzx (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • First of all, this article should be at desert pupfish. General Wikipedia practice is to put fish articles at the common name in sentence case
Done
-File:Male female mecularius.jpg was uploaded with permission from the owner
If this is so, then you must log the permission for using the image with OTRS. You'll find instructions for doing so at Wikipedia:COPYREQ. -- Yzx (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
-Requested
-File:Male macularius.jpg was uploaded to encylopedia of life link under license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported), which is apparently acceptable to be uploaded to the commons
Non-commercial (NC) images are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Copyright and licensing. -- Yzx (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
-Noted.
  • The IUCN status needs to be cited, and in any case the species doesn't seem to have been evaluated by the IUCN. It's not listed on the IUCN website
-Status is detailed in 1994 IUCN Redlist of Threatened Animals, but it does not show up on their current website. Is it acceptable to cite the book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakerb4379 (talkcontribs) 22:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The introduction does not adequately summarize the article; there's no mention of the fish's appearance or behavior, for example
  • teleost is jargony for the intro, I'd replace it with something like "bony fish" or "freshwater fish"
-Done
  • delta and basin should be linked
-Done
  • There are natural populations of this fish remaining in California and Mexico, however, populations have been introduced to several areas and some fish are kept in private ponds and aquaria. -- this sentence should be integrated with the previous paragraph about range
  • The information about ponds/aquaria, and about the population decline since the 1900s needs to also be stated in the body of the article and cited
  • "subspecies" should be linked
  • C. eremus and C. arcuatus should be linked at their first occurrences
-Done.
  • the inconsistencies between haplotype frequency are highly significant and suggest species-divergence of about 100,000 years -- this is very technical language and should be rephrased to be more reader-friendly
  • Recently, the three subspecies have been classified as three distinct species: the desert pupfish (C. macularius), the Sonoyta (Quitobaquito) pupfish (C. eremus), and the Santa Cruz (Money Spring) pupfish (C. arcuatus) -- this sentence should come after the information about the mitochondrial DNA study, since it is a consequence of the study
  • Since this is a scientific article, all measurements should be given in metric units, with Imperial conversion in parentheses
  • have more vivid markings, specifically during breeding seasons -- the "specifically" is unnecessary, unless you mean "especially"
-I do, and done.
  • caudal peduncle should be linked
  • The profile of the desert pupfish is smoothly rounded -- I assume you mean the dorsal profile?
-Yes. Can you tell I'm new to fish? Done.
  • tricuspid should be linked or explained
-Done.
  • The distribution map should specify that it's the US distribution, since it excludes Mexico
-Done.
  • The map caption shouldn't have C. macularius bolded
-Done.
  • salinity, oxygen, substrate, benthic, and algae should be linked
-Done
  • however, the desert pupfish has a smaller distribution than previously considered. -- awkward phrasing
  • extant should be linked
-Done
  • omnivore should be linked
-Done
  • What is a "shallow zone"? Does this just mean shallow water or is it something more specific?
-Simply shallow water. Clarified.
  • they will move out of the shallows during the day when water temperatures may rise to 36°C or higher -- is the temperature change the environmental cue for this behavior?
  • Rate of surface foraging -- should be "the rate"
  • invertebrate, crustacean, larva, snail, and detritus should be linked
  • intraspecies eggs and young -- "eggs and young of its own species" would be more reader-friendly
  • Pupfish will feed somewhat heavily on nektonic organisms, going so far as to suppress or even eliminate local populations of mosquitoes. In the absence of mosquito prey, pupfish will consume benthic chironomid midges both from substrate and from midwater when midges attempt to come to the surface. -- there's some context missing here; how does this information relate to the previous sentences?
  • Exposed eggs are typically and readily eaten by other pupfish if not concealed by the bearer -- is the "bearer" the female? Also, does "other pupfish" refer to this species or another one?
  • fertilized and olfactory should be linked
  • This behavior has been suggested as an analogue to the rejection of alien eggs by avian victims of nest parasitism -- how is it analogous? In function? In mechanism?
  • model for the maximization of filial fitness -- this needs better, less technical explanation
  • The "motor patterns" section looks to contain a combination of male-female, male-male, and non-reproductive (?) behaviors; the entire section needs to be broken up, turned into prose, and each behavior put into the proper context
  • Content in the "breeding" and "reproduction" sections should be swapped. Information about spawning season and territoriality should come first (and be labeled "reproduction"), and spawning behavior should come after (and be labeled "breeding" or "spawning")
  • Only mammals undergo oestrus; I think you mean "females out of breeding condition"
  • larger females spawning more than smaller females -- more eggs or more often?
  • The breeding season of the desert pupfish typically occurs during early spring and into winter -- so it lasts most of the year then?
  • Breeding behavior includes both territorial arena-breeding (high aggression) and consort-pair breeding (low aggression). -- this needs more explanation
  • primary productivity should be linked
  • defend individual territories that are typically less than 1 meter deep -- does this mean "in water less than 1 meter deep"?
  • The "extreme conditions" section should be integrated with "Habitat and distribution"
  • It has been noted that the desert pupfish are more abundant in environments with high vegetative cover, pH, and salinity, and low dissolved oxygen and sediment factors, suggesting that living in extreme conditions allows them to survive in environments that are hostile to invasive or nonnative fishes -- the second half of this sentence doesn't follow logically from the first, nor does "living in extreme conditions" proceed logically to "allows them to survive in environments that are hostile"
  • Recommend that the "management factors" section be renamed to "conservation"
  • Listed as endangered in 1986 -- by whom?
  • physical changes in water quality -- what does this mean?
  • Any examples of the invasive species that are of concern?
  • The information about management is very vague. Who did the conservation? Where? When? What were the results?
  • The "see also" section shouldn't include terms already linked in the article (like Cyprinodon), nor categories
  • Authors in references are inconsistently formatted
  • ref 1 and ref 9 don't give enough information so that someone else can locate the reference
  • ref 13 and ref 15 don't include enough information about the websites, and should also have date retrieved

There's much good information here, but the organization and prose can be improved, and there could be many more wikilinks. The main content issue is the unorganized list of behaviors. -- Yzx (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]