Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stavros Damianides: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Keep
Ephestion (talk | contribs)
Line 24: Line 24:
Western Australian and Daily News have articles also the Walkanout magazine did a complete biographic. nuff said. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/58.170.183.30|58.170.183.30]] ([[User talk:58.170.183.30|talk]]) 18:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Western Australian and Daily News have articles also the Walkanout magazine did a complete biographic. nuff said. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/58.170.183.30|58.170.183.30]] ([[User talk:58.170.183.30|talk]]) 18:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* '''Weak Keep''' The article is poorly written, but we are not to discuss the MoS or writing in the article but rather the notability of the subject. Based on the information in the "references" section, the subject meets GNG but the information must be clearly associated with the material it's meant to reference. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 07:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
* '''Weak Keep''' The article is poorly written, but we are not to discuss the MoS or writing in the article but rather the notability of the subject. Based on the information in the "references" section, the subject meets GNG but the information must be clearly associated with the material it's meant to reference. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 07:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

* '''Keep''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stavros_Damianides_Hyde_Park_Festival,_Channel_9_Stage.png The man was a legend. Appears in numerous credible sources and has many photos circulating on the Web. The last vandal deletion here on Wikipedia left this article without photos and numerous other problems. It requires restoration to the way it appeared here on Wiki for the last 10 years.

Revision as of 16:28, 24 January 2014

Stavros Damianides (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an essay - but unfortunately an essay about a non-notable individual. Fails WP:NMUSIC. No references to the entire realm of WP:PUFFERY ES&L 09:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This article has No prove of notbility under WP:GNG

Why would you call him a non notable? Many of the evidences were in photographs that have since been deleted and appear on other websites as a consequence. He was Australia's only respected Bouzouki player period. That plus he was in the West Australian and Daily News papers almost monthly with plenty of write ups. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.183.30 (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 58.170.183.30 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

How do you upload pictures? I have one with him on the Channel 9 stage at the Hyde Park festival. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ephestion (talkcontribs) 00:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a Bot? This article was part of wikipaedea for 15 years. Also what I meant was how do you show info for the references? You say there are no references but there are many they just aren't digital.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No real claim to notability and I can't find any decent sources. Granted, not all references would be digital (as stated above) but I would have expected something to be in the Sydney Morning Herald articles of the times if he was notable.Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So by your reasoning we should then delete the reference to the Monarchy of Britain because they do not have notable reference in the Sydney Morning Herald to any lineage to the Byzantine or Roman court?

Western Australian and Daily News have articles also the Walkanout magazine did a complete biographic. nuff said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.183.30 (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep The article is poorly written, but we are not to discuss the MoS or writing in the article but rather the notability of the subject. Based on the information in the "references" section, the subject meets GNG but the information must be clearly associated with the material it's meant to reference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]