User talk:User340

Welcome!

Hello, User340, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tutelary (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm The Last Arietta. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrueCrypt  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion review

If you manage to show some conduct that the afd was done improperly (which I believe that it was not), you can take it directly to Deletion review. It is not afd 2. You can't argue for deletion of the article there, but if there was something that was not proposed or discussed, let's say off wiki canvassing for example, that would be weighed in with the result. But I don't advise you to do it, considering that you don't have a good understanding of notability, and whether an article should be deleted or not.Tutelary (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I closed the discussion as there wasn't a snowball chance in hell that the article would have been deleted. If you take it to Deletion review the original closing decision will be endorsed. I suggest you {User340) read some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to get a better understanding, particularly the Content Standards and Notability sections. Cheers! JayJay^{What did I do?} 17:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, if taken to deletion review, the likely result will be endorse. I'm just telling the user what he/she's options are, even if it is peculiar their first edits were the deletion of an article. Though do note that the result at Deletion Review is final. Tutelary (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Warning!

User340, if you continue gaming the system and bludgeoning the process, you may be blocked from editing. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:User340_and_TrueCrypt Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Block

I've blocked your account indefinitely for edit-warring to repeatedly revert a legitimate AfD close. You can be unblocked once you agree to stop editing disruptively and take the close to Deletion Review if you believe there was an error made in the close.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

User340 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Quote any reason listed at Wikipedia:Speedy_keep which allowed speedy keep in this case. Why do you suppress a legitimate discussion so fast? Why don't you let me respond? User340 (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Quote any reason listed at [[Wikipedia:Speedy_keep]] which allowed speedy keep in this case. Why do you suppress a legitimate discussion so fast? Why don't you let me respond? [[User:User340|User340]] ([[User talk:User340#top|talk]]) 18:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Quote any reason listed at [[Wikipedia:Speedy_keep]] which allowed speedy keep in this case. Why do you suppress a legitimate discussion so fast? Why don't you let me respond? [[User:User340|User340]] ([[User talk:User340#top|talk]]) 18:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Quote any reason listed at [[Wikipedia:Speedy_keep]] which allowed speedy keep in this case. Why do you suppress a legitimate discussion so fast? Why don't you let me respond? [[User:User340|User340]] ([[User talk:User340#top|talk]]) 18:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}