User talk:Panac1947: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→September 2014: final warning personal attacks |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
panac1947 - Who are you to warn me !! You say Wikipedia is not a reliable source? Go to hell man! IF Wikipedia is not reliable as a whole, then why are you bothering here? Are you not in Wikipedia? Or are you in Encyclopedia Britannica site? Where are you man? Make up your mind! You are the one who is doing vandalism, not me. You are stating some stupid laws, especially the one about the movie and deleting my additions. |
panac1947 - Who are you to warn me !! You say Wikipedia is not a reliable source? Go to hell man! IF Wikipedia is not reliable as a whole, then why are you bothering here? Are you not in Wikipedia? Or are you in Encyclopedia Britannica site? Where are you man? Make up your mind! You are the one who is doing vandalism, not me. You are stating some stupid laws, especially the one about the movie and deleting my additions. |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you make [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] on other people, as you did at [[:Talk:Manglish]]. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Deleting the previous warnings just shows you have seen them. My edit was not vandalism and repeatedly calling it vandalism is an attack or trolling. Since I didn't bother to remove your last insertion of the Wikipedia link as aref, what exactly are you complaining about?<!-- Template:uw-npa4 --> |
|||
Revision as of 00:42, 22 September 2014
Please do not delete the sentence. If you cant accept, then leave it? If you are very ignorant of something, you should accept it. Don't behave like a fool! And don't be racist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panac1947 (talk • contribs) 03:36, September 17, 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
panac1947 - Who are you to warn me !! You say Wikipedia is not a reliable source? Go to hell man! IF Wikipedia is not reliable as a whole, then why are you bothering here? Are you not in Wikipedia? Or are you in Encyclopedia Britannica site? Where are you man? Make up your mind! You are the one who is doing vandalism, not me. You are stating some stupid laws, especially the one about the movie and deleting my additions.