User talk:Jeh: Difference between revisions
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: Speaking of which, the nick that did the table reorg has now [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Gegigie&oldid=642525961 revealed itself] to be a sock of good ol' Janagewen. Now we get to revert its changes, but then fold your improvements to the address bits column back in. *sigh* [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh#top|talk]]) 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC) |
: Speaking of which, the nick that did the table reorg has now [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Gegigie&oldid=642525961 revealed itself] to be a sock of good ol' Janagewen. Now we get to revert its changes, but then fold your improvements to the address bits column back in. *sigh* [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh#top|talk]]) 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Have you still confused your-self with segmentation and x86? == |
|||
If I were the CEO of Microsoft, I won't hire you, but I am not, and I am not interested in computer science at all. Do not forget it's that you kicking me of out of Wikipedia.org. [https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:X64#Segmentation_and_46_bits This] is for you! Your words, your English is less than a penny to me! Do you know how large the world is? How many people the world have? And most of all, how many things you need to learn? Hm! Hm! [[User:Computerfaner|Computerfaner]] ([[User talk:Computerfaner|talk]]) 23:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:48, 16 January 2015
 | Please don't use this page to complain about, argue against, etc., my edits. You can of course thank me for them here if you want! But per WP:TALK, any discussion (argument, debate, dispute, whatever) over article content belongs on that article's talk page, not here. That way, other interested editors can see the discussion and participate. (Who knows? Consensus might go against me! But if nobody else sees the discussion, that can't happen.) |
 |
|
And the 8086 may have been used in personal computers before the 8088 came out
According to page 2 of this article, "The 8086 first appeared in a few unremarkable PCs and terminals.", and the article seems to indicate that the 8088 came out after that. I've been trying to find a good reference for an 8086-based personal computer that came out before the IBM PC (ideally, before the 8088 itself). Guy Harris (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- The edit in question was by a very persistent sock and would be deleted on those grounds in any case.
- Speaking of which, the nick that did the table reorg has now revealed itself to be a sock of good ol' Janagewen. Now we get to revert its changes, but then fold your improvements to the address bits column back in. *sigh* Jeh (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Have you still confused your-self with segmentation and x86?
If I were the CEO of Microsoft, I won't hire you, but I am not, and I am not interested in computer science at all. Do not forget it's that you kicking me of out of Wikipedia.org. This is for you! Your words, your English is less than a penny to me! Do you know how large the world is? How many people the world have? And most of all, how many things you need to learn? Hm! Hm! Computerfaner (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)