Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan S. Hill: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
non-notable per [[WP:CREATIVE]], no independent refs given, non found, possible COI/PR creator [[User:Deunanknute|Deunanknute]] ([[User talk:Deunanknute|talk]]) 23:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |
non-notable per [[WP:CREATIVE]], no independent refs given, non found, possible COI/PR creator [[User:Deunanknute|Deunanknute]] ([[User talk:Deunanknute|talk]]) 23:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
::'''Comment'''-I was unsure of this but he did look notable at the time but now I'm unsure what to say. [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 23:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |
::'''Comment'''-I was unsure of this but he did look notable at the time but now I'm unsure what to say. [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 23:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
::'''Comment'''-He is more notable than the Australian director of same name |
Revision as of 23:52, 9 February 2015
- Nathan S. Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable per WP:CREATIVE, no independent refs given, non found, possible COI/PR creator Deunanknute (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment-I was unsure of this but he did look notable at the time but now I'm unsure what to say. Wgolf (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment-He is more notable than the Australian director of same name