Jump to content

Talk:Barack Obama: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tarc (talk | contribs)
Line 176: Line 176:
::::::If we're looking at the broad picture, I would say 95% of what is written here is not really impacting his overall history or biography. Criticisms are part of the campaign too, and I think this one is relevant because he found himself frequently defending his relationship (or lackthereof) with Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. [[Special:Contributions/100.14.57.197|100.14.57.197]] ([[User talk:100.14.57.197|talk]]) 01:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
::::::If we're looking at the broad picture, I would say 95% of what is written here is not really impacting his overall history or biography. Criticisms are part of the campaign too, and I think this one is relevant because he found himself frequently defending his relationship (or lackthereof) with Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. [[Special:Contributions/100.14.57.197|100.14.57.197]] ([[User talk:100.14.57.197|talk]]) 01:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
:::::::That's a funny definition of "frequently", when, out of 54 years of his life and 5+ years of a presidency, Obama has spent maybe 6 months having to answer questions about the matter during [[United States elections, 2008|election season]]. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 01:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
:::::::That's a funny definition of "frequently", when, out of 54 years of his life and 5+ years of a presidency, Obama has spent maybe 6 months having to answer questions about the matter during [[United States elections, 2008|election season]]. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 01:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
::::::::I agree that the story had been dead for a long time. I don't reall Ayer's name being mentioned at all during the 2012 election cycle and it's a safe bet that the Republicna would have brought if up repeatedly if it was considered significant at that time. Simply put it was not considered important enough for this biography then and it certainly is not now,--[[Special:Contributions/174.91.187.135|174.91.187.135]] ([[User talk:174.91.187.135|talk]]) 03:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 14 September 2015

Template:Vital article Template:Community article probation

Featured articleBarack Obama is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 4, 2008.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
August 18, 2004Today's featured articleMain Page
January 23, 2007Featured article reviewKept
July 26, 2007Featured article reviewKept
April 15, 2008Featured article reviewKept
September 16, 2008Featured article reviewKept
November 4, 2008Today's featured articleMain Page
December 2, 2008Featured article reviewKept
March 10, 2009Featured article reviewKept
March 16, 2010Featured article reviewKept
June 17, 2012Featured article reviewKept
October 22, 2012Featured article reviewKept
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 5, 2008.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 4, 2013.
Current status: Featured article

Template:Talk page info

Ethnicity

Why is he listed as "African American" rather than mixed race (his mother being white)? LeapUK (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)" at the top of the page, click "show" on the right to expand and then find Q2. Tarc (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, see the No true Scotsman fallacy. He's an African American. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This has been dealt with during the User:Antiedman edit War of 2009-2010. Iamiyouareyou Iamiyouareyou (talk)
His being of mixed-race seems to be an obsession to some. I'm a Brit, so when I see Barack Obama I don't see a black man - I see an American. 5.81.27.83 (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Ayers controversy

For some reason, Bill Ayers is ommitted from even a mention in this article but he was a focal point of the 2008 campaign and their relation even has an article, Bill Ayers 2008 presidential election controversy. Move to add? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.14.57.197 (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was a relatively minor issue in a single political campaign that has no significant nexus with Obama's biographical story, did not change the course of the election, and probably had less of an effect than some of the other strange issues like the birther, secret muslim, and socialist/communist/fascist conspiracy theories. Interestingly, some non-mainstream parts of America are still carrying on about this, but that's their issue, not Obama's. If this article were book length, and probably in some serious books that would cover the span of his life and career, an issue like this might get half a page as part of the discussion of campaigning, but we only have so much space here. - Wikidemon (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My goodness. That article is enormous in comparison to how much of an issue it was. I'd forgotten all about it. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was a recent edit war on the main Ayers and Weather Underground articles that spilled over onto AN/I over the perennial drive-by efforts to label them a "terrorist" group. I would have thought that the "pals around with terrorists" meme has died down to the point where this is just garden variety anger over anti-American groups, but a google search shows that the conservative blogosphere is still hung up on it.[1] - Wikidemon (talk) 22:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't the fact that there's an entire article on it suggest it noteworthy enough for at least one sentence though? 100.14.57.197 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No more than the Birther conspiracies have a place here, no. The Ayers issue was a criticism that arose duyring the 2008 presidential campaign, and had no impacting on the subject's overall history/biography. Tarc (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If we're looking at the broad picture, I would say 95% of what is written here is not really impacting his overall history or biography. Criticisms are part of the campaign too, and I think this one is relevant because he found himself frequently defending his relationship (or lackthereof) with Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. 100.14.57.197 (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a funny definition of "frequently", when, out of 54 years of his life and 5+ years of a presidency, Obama has spent maybe 6 months having to answer questions about the matter during election season. Tarc (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the story had been dead for a long time. I don't reall Ayer's name being mentioned at all during the 2012 election cycle and it's a safe bet that the Republicna would have brought if up repeatedly if it was considered significant at that time. Simply put it was not considered important enough for this biography then and it certainly is not now,--174.91.187.135 (talk) 03:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]