User talk:174.23.104.46: Difference between revisions
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I '''didn't''' insert commentary or my personal analysis into that article. Comprehend the damn edit summary, for hell's sake. And what's the supposed "difference" between my comment that smuck's removal of my pertinent edition with his or her lame term of "weird stuff" and mine calling her or his lame removal of my stuff as vandalous? [[Special:Contributions/174.23.104.46|174.23.104.46]] ([[User talk:174.23.104.46#top|talk]]) 12:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
I '''didn't''' insert commentary or my personal analysis into that article. Comprehend the damn edit summary, for hell's sake. And what's the supposed "difference" between my comment that smuck's removal of my pertinent edition with his or her lame term of "weird stuff" and mine calling her or his lame removal of my stuff as vandalous? [[Special:Contributions/174.23.104.46|174.23.104.46]] ([[User talk:174.23.104.46#top|talk]]) 12:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring over grammar issues == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Third rail]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:LjL|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL|talk]]) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:16, 24 November 2015
Thank you for your edit to 4K resolution where you replaced the misnomer "film" with cinema and movie. B137 (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 4K resolution. You will be blocked. Obvious vandalism never stands here. It is not worth it. B137 (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I didn't insert commentary or my personal analysis into that article. Comprehend the damn edit summary, for hell's sake. And what's the supposed "difference" between my comment that smuck's removal of my pertinent edition with his or her lame term of "weird stuff" and mine calling her or his lame removal of my stuff as vandalous? 174.23.104.46 (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)