User talk:Oshwah

Let's chat

Click here to message me. I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page.

Please create your message with a subject/headline and sign your message using four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.

Archives
Older Year 2007 Year 2008 Year 2009 Year 2010 Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013 Year 2014 Year 2015 Year 2015 (Jan - Jun) July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 Year 2016 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 Year 2017 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Year 2018 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 Year 2019 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 Year 2020 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 Year 2021 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 Year 2022 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 Year 2023 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 Year 2024 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024

Table of contents

Hello and thank you for the help

Well I'm trying to remain calm with this 'person' I will be blunt. I have no problem with 'editors' and contributors or anyone asking why someone has done this or that, or even delegating the rules that need to be adhered to, for a, near peer reviewed, page to be up to the requirements of the wiki's legal obligations etc. But being spoken to in the manor that this person, and two others have that User:Shawn in Montreal was good enough to sort out the first incident, is just not acceptable. I'm not a 'keyboard' warrior, I'm actually a permanently injured former Rock n Roll 'roadie' and former Security specialist, so I take the absolutely blatantly arrogant attitude that some 'editors' I've come across since re-joining the Wiki, to start addressing some of the issues I've found with musical entries on the site, due in the main to my injury to keep my mind busy, to be just that; completely unacceptable. I'm not denying my very un-professional manor of response, but when I give someone an explanation on my actions and it is completely ignored, then I'm treated like a 'peon' by them, well....that's not something I've ever put up with. Respect and manors are paramount, and I return the attitude of the person giving me it in kind. I'm a very polite, but blunt, person in the main, as I don't mince words due to my nature of dealing with pretty serious situation in my careers, literally involving life and death sometimes, as both of them had a degree of personal and external dangers. I'm more than willing to join the commons in good faith and follow due diligence so that my contributions can be useful and constructive to the people that come on here for some information about a subject matter. But there needs to be a resolution to the attitudes of those that have jumped on me from a great height of arrogance and thinking their entitled to do so. It can be said I come on here like a wrecking ball myself, but I've very much learned my lesson about the protocols to follow, and am still learning obviously, but that doesn't excuse the blatant arrogance of not just this person but the two others beforehand that have behaved in kind. I'm not excusing, or trying tot deny, or re-evaluating, my blunt and angry responses to any of these situations I've found myself in, as honesty is also a key word here. Nuro Dragonfly (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Nuro Dragonfly and thank you for taking the time to leave me a message. I completely understand how you're feeling; it never feels good to feel treated like a "peon" or a lesser person (especially when you feel that you're trying to be reasonable and make good contributions. You don't know me very well, but I spend most of my Wikipedia time patrolling recent changes and reverting vandalism - you can imagine the number of negative, trolling, and beat-down messages I receive every day (I'll even occasionally receive very angry messages from legitimate editors when I make a mistake; mistakes happen and nobody is perfect). I understand how frustrating and perhaps infuriating that this is. The thing I learned to do in my life experience is to ignore the anger and the negativity. Apologize if you find that you made a mistake, and offer to help and come to a resolution. Kill em with kindness :-). I want to also acknowledge and commend you on not only your message here, but your message on Drmies's talk page here. This is a step in the right direction. Make peace and seek resolution. If someone is bothering you with negativity, it's okay to call them out on it, but do so nicely. Just say "I feel that your response here (quote exactly what he/she said) was not appropriate because... ", and give them a chance to explain. If you need help with anything, want to talk about something or get an opinion, or just want a mentor - please do not hesitate to message me on my talk page. I'll be happy to help you with anything you need. Please keep in touch and let me know how you're doing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I did come on like a wrecking ball in my initial actions on here since my hiatus and then re-acted poorly to the situation, so honesty is the next step really. I just want to contribute, with what random PC skills I have (I've been building PCs since the Commodore 64, but only learning what code I understand in recent years), as I do like the site and try to defend it to my friends who think it is not 'peer reviewed', so therefore can't be accurate. But as I've just learned it is a bit more complicated than that. I'll just keep my head down now, use a pages talk section first (which is fair enough really considering the effort someone puts into creating said page, which I learned building my Clutch article that is now slated for AfD unfortunately..) and see what can become of consensus. I will say though that I have found some of the editors reasons for AfD on pages, as apposed to ones that are not, to still be somewhat arbitrary, and seam to be more based on personal opinion of what is a 'good' source material, and I say that in the sense if there is multiple 'small' write ups about something that it would be as good as one large written review, but that's IMO of course. Anyway, thanks for the advice and the offer of mentor-ship as I think I will need such guidance with finding my feet here in the commons. Nuro msg me 22:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Nuro Dragonfly - It's good to hear back from you. Your acknowledgement regarding your reaction to the situation shows good judgment on your part. You apologized and promised to learn from it and take is as a positive step forward; you did the best things that you could do given the situation. Don't be afraid to ask questions, participate in discussions (if you feel that you can contribute), and voice your thoughts on a subject or interpretation of Wikipedia's guidelines or policies - you don't have to keep your head completely low with the mindset that you're naturally unwelcome to contribute (just don't edit war! :-D). Making mistakes is a fundamental part of learning how Wikipedia works; nobody is expected to be perfect, and I've seen many disputes and arguments between editors go way south. This situation really wasn't that bad. If someone responds in a way where you feel treated like a "peon" (as you described it earlier), or becomes passive aggressive, the best thing to do is ignore the tone and focus on the task or issue at hand. If you do that, you can't lose :-). You're absolutely welcome to message me any time for help, or if you feel that you need some guidance or mentoring. I'll be more than happy to assist you with anything that you need. Don't let the situation hold you back; take the good learning that came from it, and leave the rest behind :-). Cheers, and good luck! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Just a hello and was wondering if you'd look at some of my work for Code scrutiny as I'm still very much learning. Its the Iron Maiden Singles Track Lists that I've been focusing on, and practicing on really, to get them all some continuity. I'm on through the first few though as I write this, so start at the beginning if you've got the time. Nuro msg me 04:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nuro Dragonfly! Sure can! Can you provide me with a few diffs so I can take a look at them? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:C401:5D00:39AB:FF40:E4D9:1EC5 (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I need help

User:Wanheda keep reverting the edits. He didn't understand my statements while i was working on American Idol (season 15). Please tell him Channel1235 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

• PS: He/She kept reverting the pages again and again i tried to reason but didn't understand. Channel1235 (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

• • Please stop User:Wanheda he thinks the chart he made is the way he made. It should be followed on this one, check it out on American Idol (season 1) Channel1235 (talk) 05:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Channel1235 - This appears to be a content dispute that needs to be sorted out with Wanheda on the article's talk page. It is highly recommended that you communicate with this person on the article's talk page and come to a resolution. I see that you've been warned for edit warring; please communicate with the user before making any more changes to the article, as continuing to go back-and-fourth like this without a resolution discussion can get you blocked from editing. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you and Wanheda need help with dispute resolution. I'll be happy to do so. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

You deleted my page.

Oshwah, you deleted my page. As you might imagine, I am a little unhappy with this decision. I created that page so that my estranged children could find me, should they decide to look me up. I do not feel like the page was hurting anyone, and I would like you to restore it. Thank you for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter.singleton (talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Walter.singleton - Sorry, but content needs to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The content that you created did not. Please let me know if you still have questions after reading Wikipedia's notability policy. I'll be happy to answer them. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

learning words is fun

here's Merriam Webster if you'd like to learn the definition of the word... http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legendary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.241.158 (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 68.48.241.158 - I appreciate your response, but this word (by consensus) does imply a viewpoint that isn't neutral. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Puffery - it will answer your questions. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

guess would have to instead say 'well known' or some such thing as the Wikipedia community doesn't understand what the word actually means...oh well, guess just limits proper communication.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.241.158 (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

my mistake

yes i had i mistake thank you. that would of been tragical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.151.158.224 (talk) 02:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

186.151.158.224 - No worries. If you want to edit test, the best place to do this is the Wikipedia Sandbox. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Reverted my correction

I corrected inapropriate content and you reverted it. I understand it was a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.194.91 (talk • contribs)

Maret Jonsdotter

Hey Oshwah!

This might be a long shot, but I was wondering if you knew anything else about the mark on Maret Jonsdotter's finger. I've been trying to find a description of what it actually looked like. I know it's a strange question- I've been delving into some genealogy and I suspected I might be related to her family. Then I read the bit about her pinky and I couldn't believe it- I've never met anyone else with a strange mark on the same finger and same hand.

Thanks!

- Holloway (meetagiantfish@gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.137.19.238 (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 75.137.19.238 - Unfortunately, I do not know anything about the subject matter. I was the last person to edit the article simply because I was reverting vandalism. Sorry for the bad news. I wish you good luck, and I hope you ultimately end up finding what you are looking for :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Note on HG reversion

Hey Oshwah, I just saw this edit. It was indeed a referenced change, just wrongly formatted. In fact, her death was already stated elsewhere in the article. I don't believe reversion was the best route here, especially given your rationale. It really does discourage new contributors. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 02:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Airplaneman! Oh, derp! Indeed you are correct; that was a total mistake on my part. Thanks for catching that and for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem – happens to all of us. Happy editing, Airplaneman ✈ 03:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Happy editing to you as well! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Persephone article

I don't see why my text seemed less objective to you. What I say is a fact! Ancient peoples did not appear out of nowhere having problems with the local languages. They came in waves and intermingled in various ways. When we come to the name Persephone it is impossible to discuss pronunciations. We do not know how it was pronounced. However, scholars do agree that in time various deities and their names were consolidated in specific forms - yet keeping some of their name variations. Claiming that the Greeks could not pronounce the name is a statement you should have removed just as you are doing with mine. It is inaccurate and false. If what put you off is my ending remark then you are right. I will remove it. I placed it there because I could not believe the stupidity of the observation in an article that has the outlook of seriousness. That combination sort of scholarly infuriated me In any case, the article also names Persephone a spring goddess while she is not that at all. Persephone is a fall deity 107.213.152.232 (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Where you from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:77D2:15E0:65B9:7C86:C25C:EC52 (talk) 04:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

The article you are protecting from my "vandalism" is full of mistakes. It vandalizes the true scholarly approach. This means that you accept a false article and disallow corrections I think I will stop using Wikipedia. Who approved the original article? This is ridiculous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.213.152.232 (talk) 04:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hi Oshwah

I need help with my reference link on the Kent James article I am creating. DaddyDog11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddyDog11 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, DaddyDog11 - No problem! How can I help? :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Mercedes PU106-Type Hybrid

Is there a sound file? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.66.166.34 (talk) 04:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 115.66.166.34 - Ah, I see why you removed that content :-). It doesn't appear so; I apologize for the confusion. In the future, it's helpful if you leave an edit summary with your changes so that other editors will know and understand why you're making changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for the message, and happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Woodstock IL, Edits

Hey Oshwah!

I understand why you would think my edits to "Woodstock, IL" are vandalism; However, I truly believe that this is a constructive and important piece of information that is appropriate for this page.

I don't think it is fair for my contributions to be censored especially when it means denying the public their right to information. This is what Wikipedia is all about, sharing information with everyone.

Thank you, Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:2801:3B00:B91E:3385:5E9C:7A1C (talk) 06:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

something I don't understand

why do you let people freely edit articles when you know they could put other things or shitty things? i don't get it wikipedia!!!!!!! GTFO!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.150.205 (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Munna Bhai

Munna Bhai chale amerika is shelved, and the section proposed sequel is out of context now to Sanjay Dutt jail term, and not required in this article, I have mentioned this in edit summary as shelved. Hope you did not understand the edit summary Shelved.Vakthruthva (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Vakthruthva. Ah, okay - I now understand what you mean. In your edit summary, you just said "shelved" - I didn't understand what that meant. Thanks for letting me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Why dont u wirte an articlt on ACA...ASSOCIATE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.237.36.235 (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

user bgwhite

i'm sorry i was screwing around didn't mean to upset you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.51.158.179 (talk) 08:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

image upload

How to upload image to Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by PankuUp (talk • contribs) 08:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, PankuUp. To upload an image, visit Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Your account must be confirmed or autoconfirmed before you will be able to do so. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

edit userbox

Can u please edit my user page with user box help to edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by PankuUp (talk • contribs) 08:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Why do I have problems with my page JellyYT?

Why do I have problems with my page JellyYT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MihailoGlavonjic (talk • contribs) 08:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, MihailoGlavonjic and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for leaving me a message with your question. The reason that your article was deleted was because it was of a non-notable person, and the article didn't indicate why the person was significant. This is explained in-depth on Wikipedia's speedy deletion page under the exact criterion here. Before adding an article, I highly recommend that you check that the article subject meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines first, as it will save you a significant amount of time and frustration. A good tutorial that you should read through is Wikipedia:Your first article. It will go over everything that you need to know. Please let me know if you have any more questions or concerns. I'll be happy to assist you. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Can you make it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MihailoGlavonjic (talk • contribs) 08:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

MihailoGlavonjic - Even if I did, it wouldn't make a difference if the article doesn't meet the notability and verifiability guidelines; it doesn't matter who creates the article. If you need assistance creating the article while you actively do so, you can do this by following the directions in Wikipedia:Articles for creation. It will show you how to create a draft, and then submit it for creation once you're done. You can also get assistance while you're in the middle of its creation. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Good luck! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Sense

What's your location? If It is not Bengal then better leave that page alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.249.4.116 (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for being so kind to me when I had difficulties with friendships. You deserve this brownie from me for helping me get a date for my school dinner dance!!! I hope you enjoying editing Wikipedia and thanks so much for talking to me on IRC!!!! EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 11:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi in case to update you, my date did not accept my offer to the dinner dance!! I would like to thank you for your tips and you have been a great person and I have used your tips for finding a date. I m sure we can talk to each other soon on IRC!! --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 04:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

HAHAHA!!! My God... :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Also, I just realized that I did not thank you for the wikilove. That was uncool of me; and for the record, I very much appreciate the wikilove. It's been nothing short of a pleasure chatting with you on IRC and running into you on-wiki! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

edit in amala paul's page

My edit is true. Her next malayalam project is that. With kunjacko boban and jayasurya. shajahanum paree kuttiyum. It will start shooting in march 2016. Please include it in filmography after amma kanakku — Preceding unsigned comment added by SREE7 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

SREE7, your edit removed almost all of the content from the article. This is why I reverted your edit and left a message on your talk page about non-constructive editing. To avoid accidents like this in the future, make sure to leave an edit summary (as you did), and use the "Show Preview" button before saving any changes. This will help you catch and avoid any more mistakes like this. Please let me know if you have any more questions. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Tripoli under Italian rule!

I'm Libya from Tripoli and we are as the Libyan people cannot let such a thing happen !

just check this page: [[1]] which changed everything in Facebook and other social sites

Please do something

E

Ciastm,yaas,t. Attack. Defend. Dokapon kingdom u. China'safuckgg (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

About tripoli under italian rule

Bold text: we got a problem when we tray to check in on facebook at (tripoli, libya) it shows that im checking under this name (tripoli under italian rule) can u please edit this Bold text

Regarding Removing Images from the article "Buffalo Meat"

As you reverted my changes I humbly request you to remove these images because:

1. The image in the "Production" Section is quite offensive. It does not have any relationship with the production of buffalo meat. Buffalo meat is not produced like this. For the production of buffalo meat, there is a proper slaughterhouse. 2. This page is created with an aim to end all the dispute between the people of India who frequently fight because they are not able to differentiate between Buffalo Meat and Cow (Which Is a sacred animal according to Hindu methodology) meat. There are a lot of riot due to this misconception. If you can remove these images I shall be highly grateful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imran3107 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Imran3107, this may be how Buffalo meat is made in a different country or culture (I'm not an expert on this however). Please remember that Wikipedia is not sensored; being offended by an image is not, within itself, a reason to remove it. If there are other issues such as accuracy, this is a different story. Instead of continuing to remove the image after other users have put them back, you should discuss your concerns on the article's talk page and make sure to ping the users that have restored them. This will help you to properly resolve the issues. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, that details about our capital 'tripoli' is wrong, our country is libya and libya is free, our capital named tripoli not like what you wrote 'tripoli under italian rule, please fix it and change the name to tripoli libya Thx... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max.m1985 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Tripoli under Italian rule wiki page

"someone changed the name of wiki page Tripoli, Libya to" Tripoli under Italian rule" please try to correct it. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.254.9.88 (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

gert rosenthal

i got your massage about the information of gert rosenthal, i uploaded yesterday and i forgot to put more information that is there.

here are the references: http://www.un.org/press/en/2010/bio4243.doc.htm and http://www.un.org/press/en/2015/sga1541.doc.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.255.44 (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 70.107.255.44 - Great! Just make sure that they meet Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines and to cite them inline with the content you're adding. Then you'll be good to go. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Nichola Bruce Article

Hi Oshwah,

Sorry to delete the talk page without commenting why, my professor requested that we delete her talk page comments before moving to the main-space and I forgot to. :) The changes have been addressed.

Thank you,

Tillercat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillercat (talk • contribs) 15:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Ciao Bella Gelato Updates

Hi, just made revisions to our page. I am the head of marketing and wanted to make updates. Changes flavors to our current portfolio and added a "Today" section. 96.92.155.50 (talk)Kevin —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Title colour

Hello. the following question might be stupid but How did you color your the title of your user page? --2003:70:CF41:301:3977:69B1:5638:D5F9 (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 2003:70:CF41:301:3977:69B1:5638:D5F9 - Not a stupid question at all! It is changed by adding the line of code below:

Code
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<b><span style="color:#C00000">Title of page goes here</span></b>}}

Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for this quick and precise answer! my second question is how did you get the blue background on this talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:70:CF41:301:3977:69B1:5638:D5F9 (talk) 16:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem! You can add a background color simply by adding the following line of code below:

Code
<div style="background-color: #EBF5FF;">

Please let me know if you need anything else! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, I appreciate that! :-) Ches (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Chesnaught555 - You're very welcome! Thank you for taking the time to leave me the wikilove - I very much appreciate it. It's good to run into you again; I hope things are going well for you and that life is good. We'll definitely run into each other again soon... it's a busy battlefield today. Until our paths cross again, I wish you happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem Oshwah. All is well over here, thanks for asking :-) I did have an injection this morning but all good now! I noticed you use Huggle to revert vandalism, and so do I. It's a really useful tool. Happy editing also. --Ches (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016 unsourced/original content as vandalism

My apologies on not citing Jim Edgar, Lester Crown, and Leonard H. Lavin correctly. I am trying to add the Lincoln Academy Award. I am not intentionally vandalizing these particular pages. Just unsure how you want it cited. I tried another way and used the template and still couldn't get it to go. Help? Please do not block me! I am trying to get it right ThurstonD63 (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, ThurstonD63! No worries; you're new here and I completely understand. If you need help adding references to the articles, please do not hesitate to ask. We'll be more than happy to help you. Again, welcome! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Can you please help me cite and award given to Laureates? I would appreciate your help. I have been reading how to cite particular things, but not an award..

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThurstonD63 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

I am going to wait until I hear from you before I proceed on the next 50 names that have to have the same citationsThurstonD63 (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, ThurstonD63 - Do you have a reliable source that you're going to use to cite your edits? You just need to follow the guidelines on Wikipedia:Inline citation. Then you'll be good to go! Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the Wikipedia guidelines that I linked you here. I'll be more than happy to answer them! Cheers! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I do have a reliable source. It will directly link back to the Lincoln Academy Award Website of Laureates Is that an acceptable source?ThurstonD63 (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

ThurstonD63 - Seems fine to me. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I'm not sure why you deleted my edit, but it appears that Wikipedia is now censoring content and is no different than any other media source. I will not be donating any money or contributing any more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.158.187.98 (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Fivelanski query

Excuse the late reply, I'm having some trouble navigating this thing.

I saw a request for citations to support information on the page for the band Diamondhead and its influence on the band Metallica, and thought I would add supporting information from the mouth of Metallica founder Lars Ulrich. The source is a 2008 interview from the British TV show Later ... with Jools Holland, I don't have the exact date but I could find out. Is there a simple way for me to do this?

Thanks

Fivelanski (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Fivelanski - Thanks for leaving me a message with your question! No apologies needed; I'm glad you're here now. Do you need help finding the source, or do you need help citing the source? If you need help with finding the source, there are search engines and tools on the internet that can assist you with that. If you need help citing the source, Wikipedia:Inline citation will show you how to use the <ref></ref> tags and cite the article properly with the source you found. Just make sure that the sources you use are reliable per Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Name of Ukraine

Hi Oshwah, sorry for troubling you but the article 'Name of Ukraine' is really nationalistic fiction. There are a lot of statements which were invented by US-ruled propaganda after Maidan overthrow to let ucrainians consider themself th enemies of russians. Don't support the please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yermek777 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

ERROR

YOU MADE A

Eugene Scalia more notable than Paul Scalia & Antonin's other children?

It seems strange that one can objectively say one of many partners of the firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is considerably more notable than increasingly powerful voice in the catholic church Paul Scalia, especially as GDC managing partner Kenneth M. Doran does not even have a wiki page.. 69.7.122.236 (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 69.7.122.236 - I don't quite understand your message. Do you need assistance with anything? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

My mistake. It was Wehwalt who did the revert. You reverted obvious vandalism quite rapidly. 69.7.122.236 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Leonardo del Vecchio

http://www.9colonne.it/47232/leonardo-del-vecchio-e-la-leggenda-luxottica#.VtH1bn2LTIU The above is the citation needed for the change made to the article.109.99.48.115 (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 109.99.48.115 - So long as your change is referenced and attributed to a reliable source, perfectly fine with me :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

HI....YOU DELETED OR "REVERTED" MY CONTRIBUTION TO THE ARGUS HAMILTON SITE. I REALLY DON'T CARE IF IT MAKES IT INTO HIS STUFF OR NOT. I'M HIS BROTHER AND JUST WANTED TO ADD SOMETHING. WIKI'S LOSS, NOT MINE.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argus1923 (talk • contribs)

Barnstar

		The Multiple Barnstar
		Stop beating me to reverts! Seriously though, I took a look at your contribution history, and it appears you've been fighting vandalism on Huggle with minimal breaks for the past eight hours. Thank you for all of your contributions, and above all else, thank you for your dedication to Wikipedia. Please know that the time you volunteer here daily is really, greatly appreciated. It's contributors like you who keep Wikipedia strong, so keep doing what you do! Mz7 (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Mz7 - it's good to see you again! HA! Yeah, I get told that all the time on Wikipedia and IRC; apparently I'm pretty quick at removing vandalism. I wanted to thank you for taking the time to leave me this barnstar. I very much appreciate it and it means a lot. I didn't have very many plans today, so I figured I'd multitask between vandal/RC patrolling and getting some other things done. It's something I enjoy doing. Again, it's great to run into you. I definitely hope you keep in touch! We'll definitely run into you again on the battlefield. Until then, happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

How can you spot possible vandalisms and fix them so quickly?

I am not experienced at reverting vandalism or any stuff like that but I am just wondering how can you do it so quickly? Do you have any particular tool for doing this? Is there anything I can do to help with vandalism, other than scrolling all over the recent changes page and occasionally find a vandalized page? Thanks.Wishds (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Wishds and thanks for leaving me a message with your questions! Well, I've been reverting vandalism for over 8 years now; proficiency is definitely improved with tools, but long-term experience is a significant factor as well. Speaking of tools, you asked about vandalism tools. Yes, there are many tools that assist with reverting vandalism. Check out Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism/Tools - it has a list of all of the most-used tools that editors use to combat vandalism. My advice is to not run to the tool that helps you do it the fastest (that actually can cause more harm than good, as mistaken reverts also will occur quicker). Go for the tool that's easy for you and that you feel comfortable with. The first tool that I used (and used for a few years) was Lupin's Anti-vandal tool. It basically filters the Recent Changes list and displays only the edits that match a blacklist of words. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be more than happy to assist you and point you in the right direction. Happy vandal fighting! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Wishds - On a very random note, I noticed that your account was created one year ago yesterday. I just wanted to wish you a happy one-year. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Oshwah - Thanks I didn't realize that... I sincerely appreciate your help (this website is great because of people like you!). I would probably try one of those tools and may inquire you if things get a little bit technical.Wishds (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Wishds - I appreciate your response, and for your kind words - thank you. Yes, please don't hesitate to message me if you run into any questions! You know where to find me! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Need online jobs

hi, I am Dharmabalan i need any online job so please do needfulDharmabalan (talk) 07:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Sock

This user talk page you recently edited, (User:Nevets20), is an alternate sock account for User:The Reptilian Agenda, both are now blocked. I have advised this user to appeal his block on his original account. As you can see, instead of doing that, he his continuing to use this alternate account talk page to make personal attacks. You removed one such attack, but then re-added it. I wondering why you did that instead of blocking talk page access? (not a criticism, just curious... ) - ^theWOLFchild 07:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Thewolfchild - Ah! So, it's because I managed to derp somehow, apparently. It looks like Huggle reverted the edit to his/her talk page, which removed the content, and then managed to add it back with my warning? That's super weird. I'm looking into it. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem. I really was trying to help this guy but he just doesn't get it. Now he's being really mean to me and hurting my feelings. [/end sarcasm]. I wouldn't know what you mean about the Huggle problem. I installed it, but can't use it without Rollback. (apparently if I had Rollback, I would destroy the very fabric of Wikipedia with it) Anyway, thanks for the reply and looking into this. Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 08:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

LOL! I'm sorry that he's calling you a meanie and that it's hurting your sensitive and vulnerable feelings :-P. Anyways, some people just can't be reasoned with. Do your best to help, keep a cool head, and you can't lose. Good luck, and it was a pleasure to shake hands with you once again :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I think I'll just avoid him. Anyway, see ya around. - ^theWOLFchild 08:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Thewolfchild - Stop by anytime if you need anything. Good to shake hands with you again :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

ACC barnstar

		The Account Creation Barnstar
		Sometimes the smallest changes make the biggest differences, thank you for your change on WP:ACC that none of us thought to do! Keep up the good work! -- Cheers, Riley 08:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Riley Huntley! Honestly, I feel that it should be me that's giving you an ACC barnstar, not the other way around. I've taken the time to review your past ACC closures, as well as your emails sent through the ACC mailing list; you've dedicated a lot of time towards the project, and your responses to requests reflect professionalism and willingness to help. Not only do I want to sincerely thank you for this barnstar, but I also want to thank you for your dedication to the ACC project as well. It's great to work alongside you, and we'll definitely run into each other often :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

You're too kind! Can you do me a favor, would you be able to look through my draft and comment/modify before I move it over? Not huge changes, just organization and some rewording. Current ACC 1, current draft 2, diff 3. I would definitely appreciation your attention to detail, a second set of eyes are always needed. :) -- Cheers, Riley 08:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Riley Huntley, it would be an absolute pleasure! Give me a little bit of time (I have a few things to get done first), and I'll take a gander and ping you on the draft's talk page when I'm finished. You'll get a ping from me soon. I appreciate the kind words in your edit summary - thank you. I'm glad that you're back on the ACC team as well! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello oshwah!

Its nice that somebody massage me about my contribution. Can you please send a reply to my massage that what you actually want to say?223.176.169.203 (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Request

Hi, I wonder if you can help out with two articles where the editor, who disagrees with the material, is removing the WP:RS cited content. In addition, they are also editing the cited content, which results in misrepresentation of sources. This appears to be a similar situation to Friedrich von Mellenthin, where you were involved, so I'm reaching out to you. If you could help out and then add this article to your watchlist, that would be great.

Articles:

• Michael Wittmann

Diffs: #2, removal and changing of citations, after a revert; #1, removal of section

• List of World War II Panzer aces from Germany

Diffs: #2, removal (after a revert); #1, removal and changing of citations

Please let me know if there are some other avenues I should pursue instead. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

First, I did not have misinterpreted any source. Just questioned your objections and contributions. The meaning of the cited passages were neither altered nor distorted in any way. The removal of the section at Michael Wittmann came due the redudancy in my eye, as the same narrative appeared on List of World War II Panzer aces from Germany. After you restored it, I kept it up, with little corrections.

• Why Kurowski is a "guru"?

You present no context, and merely say that he romanticise German war effort. So I went along and edited that sobriquet, "guru" out.

• "having a battlefield advantage rather than a tactical one."

That's not exactly what Zaloga have said: "Aside from clash between grossly unequal tank types, most tank skirmishes were won depending on battlefield advantages, not technical advantages."

• I_nvincible Tiger I

Which relevance it has to say that the Tiger I was invulnerable most of its time? Its more enough to cut down the sentence of the Tiger I to "Zaloga points out that Wittmann achieved 120 of these in 1943, operating a Tiger I tank on the Eastern Front. Having advantages both in firepower and in armor."

Other edits, were made to reduce fat, like all the German sentences, next to their cication. The cut down of the article at List of World War II Panzer aces from Germany was mainly done for the sake of internal consistency, like similar lists on ww2 aces. Milhosz (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I am very sorry for my edits on the amazing page! I was proposing to my, now, fiance and this was part of the proposal. It will not happen again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by I'm not cute ;) (talk • contribs) 01:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm not cute ;) - Wikipedia is not a social networking service or a place to propose to someone (although I do congratulate you and wish you luck). The edits you've been making are disruptive to the project, and will lead to your account being blocked if it continues. Please understand this, and please do not hesitate to message me if you have any questions. Thanks, and good luck! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

hi oshwah i don't give a christmas tree:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catsrlife2 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You keep beating me to reverting vandalism, but anyways you do a great job with reverting vandalism! Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 02:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Qpalzmmzlapq! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to leave me this barnstar. It means a lot to me. Vandal patrolling has been something I've been doing for quite a long time; don't take it personally if I beat you to reverting it sometime ;-). It's a pleasure to shake hands with you, and I wish you happy editing and much fun with vandal patrolling. Also, thanks for patrolling vandalism and helping to clean it up. It's a big task to undertake at times, and the more volunteers we have helping to clean it up, the better! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting so much vandalism on Wikipedia! Jdcomix | talk | contribs 02:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Jdcomix! Holy cow! Two barnstars in a row! I must have done something right today! Usually all I get on my talk page is trolling, vandalism, and loads of (hilarious) High School insults and threats. Thank you for the wikilove! I very much appreciate the time you took to leave me this, and I also thank you for helping with vandal patrolling. I enjoy doing it, but I understand that most people find it a grueling task. Echoing my previous reply above, the more people we have helping with vandal patrolling, the better! Keep it up! It's a pleasure to meet you, and I'm sure we'll run into each other again out on the battlefield! Until then, happy editing. :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Removal of my edited portion

It was the wrong information that is being propagated by a few with malafide intention to fulfill their political mean. Ref http://www.oneindia.com/india/no-tribe-in-india-venerates-mahishasur-says-tribal-scholar-2026536.html http://satyavijayi.com/full-exposeis-christian-evangelicalism-at-work-in-jnu-conspiracy-around-mahishasura-day/ http://centreright.in/2013/10/examining-the-mahishasura-martyrdom-day-and-dalit-bahujan-history-writing/#.VtNEbH196M9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjhadk (talk • contribs) 03:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

The Cure Award

In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Doc James - I appreciate the award you've left me. I'm sure that the bulk of those edits were from cleaning up vandalism, but I'll happily accept the wikilove and give you my appreciation for it nonetheless! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Mistake

I was updating the cast section for Vinyl after watching the third episode, that's all.72.64.207.76 (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

GEEK THAT USES UGLY MICROSOFT COMPUTERS

I JUST REALLY DIDN'T ASK IF IT IS CONSTRUCTIVE OR NOT JUST LEAVE IT YOU UNDERSTAND YOU GEEK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.77.137 (talk) 07:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello,

My mistake!!

My name Jerome Dolbert, and I built my wikipedia pages with my biography and my films. It is very tough to make it.

Thank you

Have a great day,

Best,

Jerome Dolbert — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDOLBERT (talk • contribs) 07:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, JDOLBERT! No worries! Thanks for leaving me a message. If you have questions or need help with anything, please do not hesitate to leave me a message. I'll be more than happy to help you out. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, JDOLBERT. I'm responding to the email you sent me with your question regarding content changes from an article that you've been working on. I'll be happy to take a look at that for you. I'm assuming that you're referring to Draft:The Rainforests Are Under Threat (2015 Film). I see that you removed content without explaining why in the edit summary of your edit. In the future, it's very helpful if you describe the changes you're making and why in the edit summary of your edits. This will help other editors know and understand what you're doing, as well as the reason for doing so; it avoids confusion (such as this :-)). Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello - ~Oshwah~,

Thank you for your reply!! I know for next time.

Have a great day,

Best,

Jerome — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDOLBERT (talk • contribs) 15:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

That last edit

Do you think that last edit to your talk page by 76.170.77.137 could be considered vandalism? I see they've already received a level four warning. Boomer Vial^Holla 07:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Never mind. I just seen that Materialscientist blocked them. Boomer Vial^Holla 07:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Boomer Vial! No worries, my friend. Technically it's incivility, but at this point (given all of the user's vandalism and trolling), it really doesn't matter which disruptive behavior you classify it as. Nobody is going to hunt you down if you call it "vandalism" ;-). Also, thanks for reverting those messages. Much much appreciated!!! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Haha, no worries. Thanks for the response. :) Boomer Vial^Holla 08:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Might be germane to this, but 76.170.77.137 did something on their talk page while ranting, which hid all the subsequent warnings which I assume were made by you, Oshwah, and then when I restored the warnings, they got signed by me, so I removed my signatures from the warnings. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Aha! Mystery solved! No worries, MPFitz1968. Thanks for helping with the vandalism patrolling; keep fighting the good fight! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

I recently created a page named 'Neel Ranjan Mukherjee' but my page has been tagged for speedy deletion because the information has been directly taken from a website. But this is the only information I have about the artist and every single site has the same information. I don't want my page to be deleted. What do I do?

Oishid3006 (talk) 08:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Oishid3006 - You absolutely cannot copy text straight from a source like this. This is a copyright violation, which is a serious issue and can get your account blocked from editing. You need to paraphrase the source that you're referencing, and then cite the source in the article. Also, I noticed that you removed the speedy deletion tag from the article. You cannot remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you've created yourself. You instead must follow the directions on the tag in order to properly contest the deletion. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I hadn't deleted the tag. I tried to contest the speedy deletion after reading your review but couldn't find the button until now. I know the musician personally and he has allowed me to put this information. He is the actual owner of it all. Oishid3006 (talk) 08:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Oishani

No subject

How can 2015 have 29 days in Feb, think about it. This is for your change on Union budget page, the FM presented the budget on 29-Feb-2016, no 2015, according to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.82.2 (talk) 09:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

203.112.82.2 - Thanks for leaving me a message! After viewing the source, I verified that you're correct and I've restored your change. I apologize for the confusion. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

here oshwa why you have to delete my post fam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halpmeplz (talk • contribs) 09:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Ok i won't do it thanks for letting me know!--Marshal Putin (talk) 10:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

C'mon I aint doing anything!!!!!!--Marshal Putin (talk) 10:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Jason Hoyte

Hello

You have removed an edit I had put up about Jason Hoyte. If you read what I have out you will find it all to be true.

Please review my finds. All can be found on google or radio Hauraki or on the Bhuja podcasts.

Thanks

Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.246.42.18 (talk) 10:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Birmingham Airport: edit

Hi, I very recently edited the Birmingham Airport (UK) page. I removed Beijing Capital Airlines' flights to Beijing and Hangzhou from the destination list because these flights are still unconfirmed and no start date has been announced. Until a start date is officially announced, these flights shouldn't be displayed—they were previously displayed without a start date, which gives the impression that they are already operating.86.113.22.101 (talk) 10:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 86.113.22.101! Great, thanks for letting me know. You'll just want to include an edit summary with your edits so that other editors understand what you're doing and why. It will prevent confusion and make life easier for you :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

I wanted to ask that can i remove those posts that you lest on my talkpage? Please be respectful! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshal Putin (talk • contribs) 10:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Marshal Putin! You're free to remove whatever you want from your talk page. Please understand that the warnings were not meant to be disrespectful; they were meant to make the severity of the situation clear. We want to make sure that whomever we warn clearly understands before any block is imposed. This way, we know that everything has been done in order to prevent a block from having to happen. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them and assist you. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I would like togive you this barnstar due to your active involvement in Wikipedia! Keep it up! P.S. Sorry! I once vandalized Wikipedia myself but I've learned my lesson! Marshal Putin (talk) 10:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Marshal Putin - Thank you for taking the time to leave this barnstar for me. I very much appreciate it! I welcome you to Wikipedia, and I hope you enjoy your stay and learn! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Marshal Putin

Hey Oswah, I have removed all the Rubbish on my user page but ho do I get rid of that quick deletion post? Reply soon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshal Putin (talk • contribs)

Marshal Putin, since you removed the content, you should be fine. But you'll want to leave the speedy deletion tag alone until someone else removes the tag. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! You are the best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshal Putin (talk • contribs) 10:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem; I'm happy to help! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

No subject

My daughter asked me if things don't exist and didn't happen why are they top secret ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3BA1:7450:B120:A523:CD59:2CC3 (talk) 10:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Because we're trolls and we like keeping you in the dark about the truth!!! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Edit Dispute

My edits were thoroughly accurate and I don't see why you removed them, could you please explain? or even better stop being a massive nerd and stop stalking my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmethystHive (talk • contribs) 11:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

In regards to pregnancy from rape Bosnia:

The section regarding Bosnia is full of wild rumors and war propaganda.24.17.224.192 (talk) 11:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Bryce

No subject

stop stopping me from edditing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.222.150 (talk) 11:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

it is not a test karan singh grover

i thought it would be good to have sections — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asad217 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Asad217 - My apologies for the mistake. I was about to undo my reversion, but I see that you've already done so. Thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know about the mistake. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

thanks so muchAsad217 (talk) 13:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Asad217 - You bet! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I don't usually give barnstars, but I've never seen anybody fighting vandalism more in my life! Joel.Miles925 (talk) 13:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

PS: Please stop beating me to warning users... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joel.Miles925 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Joel.Miles925! First off, let me apologize for the delay responding to your message. For some weird reason, I was not pinged at all when you left this barnstar. I'm glad you left a follow-up message about warning users - else, shoot... I would have taken much longer to notice your message. I wanted to thank you for taking the time to leave me the wikilove. I very much appreciate it, and it means a lot to me. It's a pleasure to shake your hand and meet you, and I'll probably run into you again soon out on the battlefield. Until our paths cross again, I wish you happy editing and a great day. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Ad Hominem due to Graham's hierarchy of disagreement on Xiongnu

Hi Oshwah,

There are some trusted resources about Xiongnu page which I try to revert, but user named Kansas Bear, keeps changing it without addressing the substance of argument, only explanation he makes is some socks did this edits, so what ? Just because some socks did the same editing are we going to ignore resources from Harvard University Press and U of Bristol.

<ref>{{Cite book|title = China: A New History, Second Enlarged Edition|last = Fairbank|first = John King|publisher = Harvard University Press|year = 2006|isbn = 978-0674116733|location = United States of America|pages = 61}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title = Contesting International Society in East Asia|last = Buzan, Zhang|first = Barry, Yongjin|publisher = University of Bristol|year = 2014|isbn = 9781107077478|location = United Kingdom|pages = 38}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title = Westerners in China: A History of Exploration and Trade, Ancient Times Through the Present|last = Stockwell|first = Foster|publisher = McFarland & Co Inc|year = 2002|isbn = 9780786414048|location = United Kingdom|pages = 22}}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> ?

--130.88.99.223 (talk) 13:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

130.88.99.223 - I have reviewed your changes and have accepted them into the article. I agree that they seem legitimate and don't appear to be problematic. It's a common practice to remove edits made by a blocked or banned user. But what can happen occasionally is, depending on the extent of the malicious edits caused by the user, it can be assumed that all of their changes are illegitimate which leads to having their changes rolled back without being reviewed (I've been guilty of doing that many times in the past). Mistakes can happen and it's nobody's fault; the reviewers were simply acting in good faith to try and protect the project. On a side note, the edit summary you entered on this edit is not acceptable. It constitutes incivility and is a personal attack against other editors here. Please do not engage in this kind of conduct. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me them. I'll be happy to assist you. Thank you for your patience, and I wish you happy editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Oshwah - I would like to thank you very much for your concern, and your understanding. I accept that I did a mistake while writing that edit summary, i am sorry about that, but I was watching this article probably since 3 months and every time I did some changes, a few users like Kansas edited it without addressing it's substance, that made me a bit nervous and pushed me to think that some users are acting in disruptive and even nationalistic ways, but now I do believe that they were acting in good faith . But still, I am going to continue watching that article, and I may need to ask you for help in the future. (I hope I won't). Anyway, thank you very much for your understanding again.--130.88.99.223 (talk) 19:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah,Unfortunately, i need your help on Xiongnu again, instead of discussing the content, Kansas Bear and his fellows are reverting the edits again amd again.I really dont want to enter a edit war. If you can just have a look at those resources, you will see that my edits are the accurate ones.--130.88.99.231 (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC) --Defenderofthruth (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 130.88.99.231, or... Defenderofthruth. Since this appears to be a dispute over content, you need to start a discussion on the article's talk page and discuss the issue there (just make sure to ping Kansas Bear and the other users involved). This is the proper manner in which to discuss and resolve the issue with the content that you're trying to add. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Trump / Friedrich Drumpf

Dear Sir or Madam, I only propose that the changes related to Mr Friedrich Drumpf's name before he officially changed it are recorded. This is truthful and congruent with historical records. I hope you will not find this unconstructive. I am happy for a Wikipedia editor to moderate our conversation if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.15.54 (talk) 14:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 86.15.15.54. Thanks for leaving me a message with your questions. I have reviewed the article, and I believe that the changes as they are now (this revision) is correct. If you still feel that there are inaccuracies or if you have concerns, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and ping any users involved so that you'll receive assistance. This is the proper way to resolve your concerns. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Update: My change to the article appears to be incorrect (as stated by 1305cj). I'm going to defer to his judgment. Updated link. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Spi

Might want to open SPI for TheGangefather. Seems like sqme person as 77.89.146.101.Moist Towels (talk) 14:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Moist Towels - Done. Thanks for letting me know :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Vaughan Williams Vandalism

You reverted a "contribution" today to an article on Ralph Vaughan Williams: 09:20, 29 February 2016‎ 78.158.66.93 (talk)‎ Several other examples of vandalism have been posted by this user - or from this school address - over the last two years. Could you do something more drastic and have this so-called user blocked? (I don't know how to initiate such action). John Hamilton (talk) 14:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Oldfaw, and thanks for leaving me a message with your concerns. A block can not occur yet, as the IP has not caused enough disruption to warrant one at this time. The last edit that the IP made before their edit to Ralph Vaughan Williams was on February 9. If this user continues to be disruptive, you can file a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. This is the proper channel that everyone goes through in order to report a user and have them blocked. However, the account or IP has to have caused enough disruption and be warned a sufficient amount of times first (depending on how extreme the damage is, the "cutoff" varies). I highly recommend that you read Wikipedia's blocking policy before reporting anybody, so that you'll know when the right time is to do so. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Volodymyr the Great

Because Volodymyr it's a Ukrainian name not (Vladimir) he was Kyivan prince, Kyiv is the capital of Ukraine. So I added changes in the page, and also change Kiev into Kyiv (because this is the correct transliteration from Ukrainian language) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.45.140.2 (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) It doesn't matter what the modern day transliteration of the name is from the Ukrainian language since Vladimir the Great ruled Kievan Rus, a country that predates the country of Ukraine by 1,000 years and the Ukrainian language by 500 years. The only transliterations that matter are from Old East Slavic and Old Norse, the languages spoken in Kievan Rus and by Vladimir the Great. You can spell the name any way you want on the Ukrainian language Wikipedia, but here, on the English language Wikipedia, we use the common name in English, i.e. Vladimir. Thomas.W ^talk 16:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

twerton youtez — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.120.78.182 (talk) 16:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Well, take a look at this monument that is located in London https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/London_St_Volodymyr_Statue.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.45.140.2 (talk) 17:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

• With the text "Erected by Ukrainians in Great Britain" clearly written on the foundation of the statue, plus the totally anachronistic claim that Vladimir was "ruler of Ukraine", a country that didn't exist until a thousand years later. So the spelling of the name on that statue has nothing whatsoever to do with what is in common use in the English speaking world. We use Vladimir the Great, Kiev and so on, and will continue to do so until the common names in English language media have changed, which with all probability will take many years (after many hundreds of years Wien is still Vienna in English, København still Copenhagen, Roma still Rome and Moskva still Moscow; just to name a few of the hundreds if not thousands of foreign language names that are different in English compared to in their original languages). Thomas.W ^talk 18:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

don't think you meant to do...

...this at ANI. I don't want to revert your comments, so I'd appreciate it if you'd fix this so mine are restored. Thanks. :-) Katie^talk 19:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Katie - AWW CRAP!!!! I'm sorry! Totally an accident. I'm fixing it right now. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I knew it. :-D Katie^talk 19:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Katie - Sigh..... Okay, you're going to shake your head at me again. But I restored the messages, realized that I restored them to the wrong reply, then moved them to the correct reply. Wow, today is obviously not my day! Thanks for letting me know about what I managed to do. I think what happened was that I had an older revision open on my browser, and edited the page without realizing that it was old. That's the only way that I can explain how I managed to pull that magnificent display of utter stupidity. Quite a performance! Anyways, everything should be good to go now :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I hate it when that happens. It's like a race to type something in at ANI before STOP! Black flag! Go find your stuff among 86 TB of text and re-add it because somebody said six words way the hell up at the top of the page about something you couldn't care less about, but they won the typing contest. You'd think as smart as the devs are that they'd figure out a way to kill edit conflicts outside the same section. But no - we're building a Knowledge Engine. _/rant Thanks for dealing with it. You're a good egg. :-) Katie^talk 19:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate you for giving me a good laugh, and for the kind words. Until our paths cross again, I wish you happy editing and a good rest of your day. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sakurai's Object

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sakurai's Object you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Pinging UY Scuti and Eat me, I'm an azuki. Thanks for reviewing the article, Samtar! I'm excited to see what the result is. If there are things that need fixing, let me know and I'll throw some touch-up paint on it ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sakurai's Object

The article Sakurai's Object you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sakurai's Object for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Samtar -- Samtar (talk) 21:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Pinging UY Scuti and Eat me, I'm an azuki. Congratulations, team! We did it! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Champagne!! —UY Scuti ^Talk 07:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

UY Scuti! Eat me, I'm an azuki! A toast to our successful GA nomination! Not only did we get that article in top shape in less than two months, but we got the article to pass the requirements on the first try. Well done. Very well done. I know that we have very busy schedules right now. Once things calm down, lets start looking for a nice and short article that we can build up and make our second GA (preferably one that's as easy as our first). Lets get our busy lives under control, and regroup in a week or two. Again, I'm happy for us. We accomplished great team work and collaboration, and we get along extremely well. I'm lovin' it! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

steals some alcoholic drinks from his dad—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 09:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey, we all did it. I sure did :-P ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.34.223.233 (talk) 03:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Did you need help with anything? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit reversion on "The Americans"

Hi,

I changed Jennings' to Jenningses because Jenningses is the proper plural form of Jennings. That's the only reason.

Thanks.

32.215.197.23 (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, 32.215.197.23 - I see what you meant to do. No worries; I think that the original formatting was correct however. But I appreciate the message and for letting me know about the edit. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Chrome user who tried to edit due to having the John Oliver extension

Sorry about the edit that was caused by the Google Chrome extension from Last Week Tonight With John Oliver that I downloaded earlier today. I was trying to add the show to the game show genre when it caused the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoteOpusNBill2016 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I MADE NO MISTAKE

BRUH. HOW DARE U SAY MY POSTS WERE NOT CONSTRUCTIVE. JOKIPAKKA IS LITERALLY MY FINNISH PRINCE, AND SEGSY SEGUIN IS THE BIEBER OF HOCKEY. BRUH. WHY U GOTTA BE LIKE THIS. Relentless confuzzlement (talk) 04:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)YOUR FAVE, LANEY JOKIPAKKA

Damn, beat me to the punch.

Blast you youngsters! HalfShadow 03:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, HalfShadow! HA! Thanks, that gave me a good laugh :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Bailey House Museum

Aloha, I'm attempting to make updates to the Bailey House Museum page because The Maui Historical Society is changing the official name of the museum to Hale Hoike'ike. All references should now reflect this change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maui Historical Society (talk • contribs) 04:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Change to Minnesota Timberwolves page

Under the individual awards sections there is a slot for slam dunk contest winners, I removed the entry about Gerald Green winning it in 2007 because although he did win it that year it was not with the Minnesota Timberwolves it was with the Boston Celtics, I noticed a message saying that my deletion had been undone and that entry was put back in place, just wanted to inform you that it was incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.129.55.192 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion - Chris Layland

Hi! I suggested the speedy deletion for Christian Layland under WP:N that you removed, on the basis of a Google News search shows a single news source referring to the subject in the context of the article's main claim to notability (a football podcast), and no News or Scholar archive results. Further, the majority of the external links (thefootballsack.com) are from the website of the article's subject. I still think it fails the WP:N criteria, but I'm not sure whether to nominate for deletion under the AfD process, or whether a suggestion that it be merged with an article about said blog - any advice for a new editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiredgrad (talk • contribs) 04:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tiredgrad! You're actually in luck! I just explained Wikipedia's speedy deletion guidelines over on PaulAshford's talk page. This will answer your questions, and provide you with the documentation you need. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Oshwah! Have nominated under the AfD process :) Tiredgrad (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tiredgrad! You bet! I'm glad my response was able to point you in the right direction! Do not hesitate to give me a shout if you need help with anything else. I'll be more than happy to lend a hand :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hello I'm new and I wish to make a wiki page about myself. Is that possible? Everest.Andrew (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Everest.Andrew, thanks for leaving me a message with your question. Is it technically possible? Yes. Your account is not going to prevent you from doing so (so long as it's autoconfirmed). Is it okay to do? No. You should read Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. Editing articles where you have a conflict of interest is highly discouraged behavior. It doesn't allow you to edit in a neutral point of view. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

ow chore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanold (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

the power of five

i have changed the plot overview as it was giving away too much of the story and was a spoiler but i did accidently delete it before but now it is good thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.189.138.44 (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit of cultural fraternities

hi! this is my first time, can you explain why its not contructive? i just wanted my fraternity linked on the list. Rickeyhuynh (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Rickeyhuynh. Please accept my apologies. It looks like I reverted your change by mistake. I've gone ahead and removed the warning and verified that your changes were restored. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi Oswah,

I've recently made some changes to Garage Magazine's page – while explaining and using citations of any changes that I have made – and you have deleted them all, reverting the page back to its original state. Please may I ask why? If I have made any mistakes I will be more than happy to explain.

(Most information and imagery on the page was out of date, quite considerably. I was trying to bring the page back into relevance.)

Ashley1091 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashley1091 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Citation Doubt

Hey. I made the page and paraphrased it myself so the page hasn't been deleted. But there are parts of my page that say 'citation needed' and 'where?'. How do I remove those and can I provide a link to any site that gives the same information about the awards? Oishid3006 (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Oishani

Format

Hey senior user, I just wanted to know that can I Pleasssseee borrow your format? not the whole! Just the one in which it's written click here to send me a message! No problem if you are not willing to!--Field Marshal Putin (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Fuck Me Pumps edit

I am not a very experienced Wikipedia editor, but what I edited on the Fuck Me Pumps page was from http://www.ew.com/article/2007/11/10/frank that review from Entertainment Weekly. If you would please add the quote (the last in the review) to the article and cite it, that would be excellent. 75.97.50.254 (talk) 03:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)David Fathom

Hi, 75.97.50.254 - I reverted your edit to Fuck Me Pumps because it didn't appear to be representing a neutral point of view. If it was from a source, then just make sure that you include the source and make sure to quote the source so that it doesn't appear to be commentary, but quoted from a source. Please let me know if you need anything else! Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Message about edit on Peter Popoff

Hi - you sent me a message about an edit on a Peter Popoff. I didn't edit this page as I never even heard of him.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.110.68 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

If you're using a shared IP address (on a public network), you may want to consider creating an account for yourself to avoid receiving warnings from other people. This will resolve your concerns. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Eric Brewer

Eric Brewer was an enforcer in his days so you don't know what your talking about. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockey Mod (talk • contribs) 03:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

How to speedy delete an article you're the author of

Thanks for deleting the article I marked with a db|1=author tag. What is the correct process? This page was not very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chursaner (talk • contribs) 04:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Chursaner! Again, I welcome you to Wikipedia with open arms and an open talk page. You're more than welcome to message me here at any time with any questions or requests for help. I fixed the page that you linked; it looks like someone removed the text from the essay and it was never fixed. I'll look into it more and figure out why that happened. You were actually very close! you had put {{db|1=author}} on the top of the page you created; it just needed to be {{db-author}} instead. So you were on the right track! I apologize if the essay you provided was confusing, but it should be fixed now :-). Please do not hesitate to leave me a message if you have any more questions or if you need more help. I'll be happy to give you a hand! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! That was me that deleted the text.. I read somewhere that making the page blank was one way to get a speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chursaner (talk • contribs) 16:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct in that blanking the article or page you created yourself will prompt another editor to tag the article for G7. However, it's usually better if you add the tag yourself (if possible), as it will save other editors time. No worries, though! You're new, and being bold is what Wikipedia is all about! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I need your help with a user

Hello, I have been reviewing a user's contributions, and I have noticed that they have been changing or adding unnecessary racial and religious identities to people within the articles. The user is anonymous, and has made numerous changes. The user's IP is 74.95.112.141. If it is not too much trouble, would you review the contributions? HowlingAngel (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, HowlingAngel! Sure can! Are there any specific articles or diffs that I should know about? This will point me in the right direction. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Since the user has changed so many, if you do find the changes to be unnecessary, you may want to review the user's contributions page. However, I'll provide some of the articles here.

Timeline of nursing history , History of surgery , Donald Soffer , Daniel Hale Williams

I reverted the edit on Daniel Hale Williams. If it was not a correct action, please undo it. I hope this helps, and thanks for helping me! HowlingAngel (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I think your reversion was correct, as the picture clearly isn't of an African-American person. It could have been an honest mistake though; remember to assume good faith. Were there other examples that you reverted? This IP has made a lot of contributions; it'll be hard to go through every single one. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

There are some other examples. On the page Timeline of nursing history there seems to be some changes that are not exactly reliable. The problem, however, is the user made multiple changes to the article in separate sequences, making it hard to tell what information should be reviewed. Some of the information looks as if it's unsourced, while parts of the timeline have been removed, or events changed. HowlingAngel (talk) 06:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Hey. sources was provided in both Brahmanbaria District and Akhaura Upazila page. But after all whats the reason to delete? Can you please explain? Bangla1234 (Bangla124|talk) (EST) 3:25 March 2016.

Me, Myself and I by G-Eazy and Bebe Rexha

You recently removed an edit I made to "Me, myself and I" song in the background section. My edit was made based of this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on8F2OXGfJw Bebe Rexha gave for a radio and the source was linked to that paragraph. So before removing stuff , check the sources before. You thought was biased, well you could have opened the video of the interview and heard the exact thing in words said by the writer of the song, it was just a transcript. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.69.5.52 (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Dear Oswhah,

Obstruction of the thruth violate the policy of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia was already be informed.

You as a qualified editor is entitled to correct wrong facts but not to obstruct the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 09:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

At this point, your editing denotes that you are trying to not disclose the name of the father of the child which is already public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your editing was refered to Wikipedia and to his lawyers. Wikipedia has clear rules and you are obstructing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.43.175 (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry about my edit. I wanted to say that the citations for the info you removed on the Timothy Parker page is the same FiveThirtyEight.com article. I don't know how to cite that because I'm a noob, but I think it is important information for the page. Xmaster8621 (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Xmaster8621

Hi, Xmaster8621! No apologies needed. It appears that the information added was the same by two different users (or the same user while logged out) - each without citing any sources. There was also issues regarding Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which was why I removed the content. All in all, it's a content dispute that needs to be discussed on the article's talk page by everyone involved. There's been too much reverting, and too little (well none) discussion happening, which is why I filed a report and will leave it to another pair of eyes to investigate and step in. If you have any questions or concerns, my talk page is always open. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Sujit Meher

--Vond1926 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC) This article is promotional and this was deleted previously . False information has been added, Sujit is AD (Accessories design ) student passout with C Grade http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/Result_Jan_June2013_AD_VIII.pdf . --Vond1926 (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Dear Wikipedia Members,

I am writing to you today to inform you that my ex-husband Carl-Edward von Bismarck's wikipedia site has been tampered with and manipulated. I have tried to correct the basic errors of my name and marriage history. Unfortunately, someone has been meddling with it and using the wikipedia site for personal vendettas and defamation of character. I would like to state my true corrections in this email once more. I will correct such one more time now. If it will be tampered with again, i will hold whoever is responsible in a court of law. It is my right to have my name spelled correctly. It is my right to have my marriage history recorded and as the mother of my children.

My ex-husband last year has hacked into my Facebook account. He has changed my name, my profile picture, took off all my life contacts and has connected with my friends on Facebook impersonating me. I have reached out to Facebook and discovered through them that the new domain holder for such doing was my ex-husband's email. Facebook has given me the option to bring him on criminal charges. I have decided to let it rest and not bring him on criminal charges, i fixed my Facebook account and started a new one.

However, if these actions continue one more time on Wikipedia I will have no choice but to bring on charges whoever is tampering with it. I apologize in advance for approaching you with such an unfortunate subject and i ask you please to make sure history is recorded correctly.

Here are my changes:

1) My legal name today: Countess Nathalie von Bismarck Bariman 2) My name before marriage: Nathalie Bariman (and not Boriman as was tampered with) 3) I was married to Carl-Edward von Bismarck from 2004 to 2014. 4) We have two children together: Count Alexei von Bismarck 9 years old, Countess Grace von Bismarck 7 years old.

Again, i thank you for taking the time with the hope that you can help me put this disturbing matter to rest. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any further questions you may have.

All the best, Countess Nathalie von Bismarck Bariman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaoz529k (talk • contribs) 16:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Taoism article

Hi Oshwah,

In response to your message: I made several different edits, and it seems all of them have been reversed. I took the time to provide detailed explanations for each of those edits (found in the article history), but all of them have been reversed without any individual responses given. Saying that a variety of different edits do not adhere to a neutral point of view is not very clear. This is especially important considering that none of the edits I made actually added any text to the article. Further, one of the edits was correcting an entirely objective mistake - the misplacement of the Tao Te Ching image in the I Ching section instead of the Tao Te Ching section. By undoing my edits, that image has now been returned to the incorrect location; it is difficult for me to see how this is a point-of-view issue.

As such, could you examine the reasons I gave for each edit and explain why you feel each of them do not adhere to a neutral point of view? Sunkencathedral (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Sunkencathedral and thank you for your message. I took a look at your previous edit; I thought that you added some content that didn't appear neutral, but I just realized that you simply moved it. I went ahead and restored the page back to the state that it was in with your edits applied. Please accept my apologies for the confusion. If you need anything else, please let me know. Thanks again for leaving me a message regarding your concerns. I very much appreciate it, and I wish you happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Wow, thank you very much for returning the article, and for your prompt reply! I was very confused about why they had been removed; but it was just an honest mistake, it's no problem at all. Thanks again, and happy editing! Sunkencathedral (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey

Just registered on wikipedia and was wondering where a good place is to start helping out or if anything needs to be done if there is a list or something F4d3d123 (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, F4d3d123 - That is an excellent question! Wikipedia's help page with Contributing to Wikipedia is a great place to start if you're looking for somewhere to start diving in and helping out with, but aren't sure where yet. You can also browse Wikipedia's page on WikiProjects; it will let you search for projects that interest you, so you can start getting involved and helping with the articles or content that they're currently working on. Please feel free to message me again if you need more ideas, but these two places should surely set you in the correct direction. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy your stay, and I wish you happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much Oshwah F4d3d123 (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

You bet! My talk page is always open if you run into any more questions or get stuck somewhere! Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Re edit on Saheed Balogun

Thanks for your message. His real name is Saidi balogun but there has been a lot of miss spelling and confusion which turned out to be spelt as Saheed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabioerdters (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Question about edit reverted

Hi Oshwah, I am currently at an edit-a-thon at UIUC. OOKbook is a participant and I was showing this new user Talk page protocol -- making sure the comment pings the user, proper signature, etc. Is it preferred that a response to a Talk page comment go on that user's Talk page instead? Vaparedes (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Vaparedes! Thanks for letting me know! I reverted your changes to OOKbook's talk page because you modified a comment that OOKbook made, which is typically not allowed and will be reverted (since other editors won't know about your involvement in the Wikipedia Meetup). However, since your objective was simply to give the user an in-person tutorial over talk pages, I personally don't see any problem with it. It would be a better idea to show this person a tutorial by either adding a new message to his/her talk page, or editing a talk page message that you left. This way, it won't result in reversions or confusion by other editors that are patrolling. If you have any more questions, or if you need any help, please do not hesitate to respond and ask. I'll be more than happy to lend you a hand! Good luck at the Meetup! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Oshwah, Vaparedes... Thanks both for the help. Vaparedes made edits b/c we were comparing the interface on my iPad with that on Vaparades's laptop. Sorry for any confusion! OOKbook (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

OOKbook - No apologies needed! Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please feel free to message me and ask them. I'll be more than happy to assist you whenever you need it! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

hey

Hey what did you mean Vero6900060 (talk) 19:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Saint Andrews School

":" OSHWAH I DO ATEND SAINT ANDREWS SCHOOL AND I AM A GRADUATING SENOR THIS YEAR AND THE IS MY SENOR PRANK SO PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE IT AGAIN Wownina02 (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Information on 71.179.21.197

Hello Oshwah! I was suspicious of 71.179.21.197, and so looked up his IP. The result is here: http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/71.179.21.197 This indicates that the user is based in Ellicott City, MD. I then looked up Timothy Parker, and found this: http://www.whitepages.com/name/Timothy-E-Parker-Jr./Ellicott-City-MD/i7zf4j1, which is very likely the Timothy Parker from this article, as it shares the age, city, and middle initial of the Tim Parker in the article. Since the White Pages link provided the address, I looked to see exactly how close the IP was to his address. Quite close, imo: http://www.latlong.net/convert-address-to-lat-long.html

I don't know if any of this is helpful in making any decisions, but it does seem very likely that Tim Parker used both a registered account to edit his own page, and then used an unregistered one when he was caught.

Xmaster8621 (talk) 20:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Xmaster8621

help with Lenka Clayton page

I started a draft for Lenka Clayton today, Mar 5, the same day as another page on her was started, which you flagged. Anyway to get my draft moved to article and the other flagged page deleted? Or at least to get the info combined and improved? thank you Lu.heintz (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lu.heintz, and thanks for leaving me a message with your questions. I see two pages right now: One is Lenka Clayton, which will be deleted because the creator copied text straight from external sources (which is a big violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy). The other is your draft. As soon as the "non-drafted" article is deleted, your draft can replace the previous article in its place (once it has been reviewed and accepted). For now, you just need to sit tight; someone will resolve the matters and your article will be reviewed. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers! -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

UFC 196

Heyy Oshwah! I'm a new user coming in from a bureaucrat in a game wiki, trying to revert vandalism when I can. I was intrigued by a user editing the UFC 196 page. Could you please double check the edits by usernames with long random gibberish are checked? Sometimes I see they are funny.

I've been checking Recent Changes to see what goes on behind the scenes in Wikipedia. That's some active stuff going on there :). Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia credible for me with my schoolwork.

3primetime3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

a small request

I see that you already templated this IP user. Could you please keep an eye on their contribs? They're making multiple non-useful edits that create work for others. They have multiple recent warnings, including level 4 and 4+. They're been templated for not (make that never) leaving edit summaries or using the preview function, yet still continue to edit doing neither. Multiple attempts to talk to them on their talk page have been ignored. Some edits are helpful, many aren't. There is WP:CIR issue here. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 12:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thewolfchild - You got it! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

modification of 2002 National Football League (Ireland)

Hello Oshwah,

I received a message from you regarding an update I made to the page "2002 National Football League (Ireland)". In the message, you indicated that my changes were not accompanied by an edit summary.

The changes I made were in fact accompanied by an edit summary which explains the changes made.

Thanks,

Tinahinse (talk) 14:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Tinahinse! I apologize for the confusion. I realized that you didn't remove anything (I thought you had removed the article infobox); you simply collapsed it. I restored your edit to the article as it was when you made the change. Please let me know if you need anything else :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, I made two edits to that and left the reason for editing it in my first edit, the reason is that, laogai has been abolished since 2015 thus only the number of population being present in prisons are taken into account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Htzh (talk • contribs) 19:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi!

Some users from 4chan are raiding the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Andersson_(game_programmer) page. It's better to lock the article to stop edit wars. Watch out for other paradox pages too. Podcat (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

underground gas

Hello. Early last century, many Midwest communities manufactured glass, making use of regional natural gas. Do some of these pockets of gas still exist? 166.175.185.30 (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Jorge Filipe Monteiro - Reply

Hello OSWAH, from Portugal,

my edit, which you reverted, consisted of removing a storyline which consisted of repeating the infobox in a text, in broken English and with ZERO refs. WP is all about references, is it not? I have been here for almost ten years, so I think I was operating within the guidelines there.

Maybe my summary was a bit over the top and that misled you? Could be, and for that I apologize to the community overall. Attentively, happy editing --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

edit

hello oshwah. I did not mean to delete the whole thing, just 1 word. I am sorry for this error, and I wish to be forgiven for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.130.204.76 (talk) 02:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

removed some content from Ting-Chao Chou

Hi oshwah,

The reason I removed the contents is because I combine some same links from section 6 and 7(removed section) due to some duplicates. Let me know if I am make any mistake.

Thanks. James

Over hasty speedy delete nomination

Plip!

Hi, you nominated Sofia stella feldstein for speedy delete. However that was only 1 minute after creation. You should give the writer a chance, say around 1 hour to get in a claim of importance, and some references. They may now be frightened off. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett - AWW, CRAP!!!! That was done by accident!! Sorry!!! I didn't mean to tag this article. Thanks for catching this :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, a trout would have been completely acceptable in this situation ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The article may have deserved a speedy delete, after waiting, but hopefully a blp prod will have the same outcome, either stimulate the writer to indicate notability, or it will get the chop. Numerous other SD taggers are getting in too fast too. There is a lot of over-enthusiasm around. I am trying out the different sized fish. I don't think it deserves a full sized trout! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett - I completely agree; I usually wait at least 15 minutes after the article's creation before considering any claim of significance CSD tag. It's the right thing to do, as "racing to be the first person to CSD that article" is absolutely a BITE to newcomers, and it's not what CSD was meant for. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent revisions to the Henryk Fuchsbrunner article

Hey there, I got your message about the reversion of my revisions to the Henryk Tauber/Fuchsbrunner article. My goal with the edits was cleaning up the grammar, improving the clarity of the article and reducing redundancy. For one example, he's referred to by three different last names in the article - Tauber (his birth name), Fuchsbrunner (the name he was most often known by), and Fuchs (the changed spelling of his name once he immigrated to the U.S.). I just changed all of the references to Fuchsbrunner for clarity. The last paragraph I deleted contained all material that was either unverifiable or contained in earlier paragraphs already, and the rest of the edits were just to make the writing grammatically correct. Of course, it doesn't bother me if the reversion stands. 98.203.240.70 (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

sorry for destroying this site

( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.137.140.169 (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding the Chitauri page

If you want to find a better way to word that correction, I have no objection. What would you suggest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3150:EAD0:496C:7B1F:EE52:6D77 (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and smile

I edited the page Mahika Sharma (actress) and removed the issue created by someone. Because I do not think their are any copy/edit problem. Many a times I have found most of Indian wiki pages goes off or been deleted without any reason. I would request you to keep Indian wiki page store and if you can help solving the issues post on the page. Kindly do think.. thanks Indianeditor22 (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Crawford (neuroscientist)

Please read the reference before reverting. Cheers Rentier (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Dear Manager,

Sorry to interrupt your main source. I just wanna contribute of the biography of Abdullah Makapaar or Abdullah Macapaar. What I am contributing is relevance. just want to updating the exact details.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Fiefee (talk • contribs) 10:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Gyanmati Mataji Guiness Certificate

Hello, I was about to upload the Guiness Certificate.

11:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErASethi (talk • contribs)

On reverted comment at Talk:Clang

Hi Oshwah, you messaged me about removing my talkpage comment here.

Thank you for keeping Wikipedia talk space clean and moderated!

While we're at it, could you also clean up the whole Talk:Clang#Compatibility_with_C.2C_compile_Unice_Softwares.2C_and_use_of_Brand_Name section? I admit that my comment was not particularly constructive, but the section it addressed is well beyond any sane reason.

If not, then I wonder how exactly you discriminate one unconstructive comment from another (and delete one, but leave the other), because that doesn't seem like a neutral way of moderation.

Best wishes, anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.90.177.150 (talk • contribs)

Statue of Ahimsa

Hello, Thanks for ur commnets. The Guiness guys visited the Statue yesterday and they awarded the certificate yesterday.

ErASethi (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding The Asterisk War's premise I found on the Crunchyroll site, I found its premise to be more accurate (coming from what I watched of the show):

Invertia (meteor storm)… an unprecedented disaster that struck the world during the 20th century.

Because of this disaster, numerous cities around the world were destroyed. However, within the meteor, an unknown element called mana (the all-encompassing element), was discovered, which allowed human technology to make rapid strides.

This also gave rise to a new species of human born with unique skills – the Star Pulse Generation (Genestella).

The setting for the world’s greatest comprehensive battle spectacle, the Festas (Star Warrior Festivals), is an academy city above the water surrounded by six academies called Rikka also commonly known as Asterisk. Having transferred into Seidoukan Academy in order to fulfill his own wish, scholarship student Ayato Amagiri swears he too will fight in this city.

Burning souls race…

The curtain rises on this school battle spectacle! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.5.114.106 (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Libyan Investment Authority

Hello.

Thank you for taking an interest in Libyan Investment Authority. All edits made by me were in a good faith, not in favour of any party as they represent current, ongoing situation - leadership dispute between Abdulmagid Breish and Hassan Bouhadi. They both claim chairmanship and until Court ruling is available (which is supposed to be in two weeks time) this information should be available not to mislead readers.

The following articles (used as references) clearly represents this neutral point of view:

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20150531/local/ex-banker-back-as-head-of-67bn-fund.570326

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/11713902

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-07-09/libya-s-66-billion-wealth-fund-replaces-chairman-amid-probe

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-libya-security-swf-idUKKCN0W9007

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueSeedRose (talk • contribs) 13:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. You're engaging in edit warring by continuously reverting content back-and-fourth with another user (See Wikipedia's three-revert rule). These policies exist in order to drive discussion. Edit warring can (and usually will) result in being blocked from editing. Please discuss the content dispute on the article's talk page with the other user. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Somebody trying to defaming on Public figure

Dear Oshwah,

Thank you so much for edit of Sujit Meher page. Someone keep trying to defame this public figure page. Always putting unnecessary data about this public profile. Please kindly take some action against those ip addresses. And i would request you to tell me the ip address of Vond1926 user who tried to defame the profile of the person so that we can take some action against it. Its a humble request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novelbuzz (talk • contribs) 14:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Hello sorry if i did something wrong but i think may edit is quite accurate and that you are doing is a harrasement. Thank you and sorry for my language, in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.85.225.204 (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

A note about Ostriches

Dear sir,

I am from Uzbekistan and know that it is generally considered an ill omen to eat ostrich, as some consider it black magic over there. Now, when I came to America, I noticed that ostrich is not only eaten in some restaurants, but eaten as a exquisite meat, such as restaurants swerving Ostrich burgers. Unsurprisingly, this was a strange and disorienting experience for me, but opened my eyes to the world around me as to how cultures appear different in other people's eyes. I find it confusing as to why you reverted this edit. I noted you said I needed a citation? I understand the need, I suppose, but as a person who has lived there for a good amount of his life, isn't a first person account a detailed enough response? It works well enough for stories of Junius Caesar, and I note he is present on this online center of information. I ask you to please allow this note to remain present on this page which I am quite found of. Thank you, and have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spencertmiller (talk • contribs) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)