Talk:Rogue One: Difference between revisions
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
: He's not listed as a clone trooper, he's listed a veteran of the clone wars. More than just clone fought in the Clone Wars. That being said, I have no idea where they're getting all this info, they're not cited. Considering removing them actually. --[[Special:Contributions/82.40.171.48|82.40.171.48]] ([[User talk:82.40.171.48|talk]]) 21:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
: He's not listed as a clone trooper, he's listed a veteran of the clone wars. More than just clone fought in the Clone Wars. That being said, I have no idea where they're getting all this info, they're not cited. Considering removing them actually. --[[Special:Contributions/82.40.171.48|82.40.171.48]] ([[User talk:82.40.171.48|talk]]) 21:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
::Agreed. They should either be cited or removed. [[User:Oknazevad|oknazevad]] ([[User talk:Oknazevad|talk]]) 21:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
::Agreed. They should either be cited or removed. [[User:Oknazevad|oknazevad]] ([[User talk:Oknazevad|talk]]) 21:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::Yep, also, 1 or 2 of the citations given seem very speculative as opposed to actual confirmed facts. Not quite sure if they meet Wikipedia standards. |
Revision as of 21:42, 8 April 2016
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Requested move 19 December 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move per request as the common name and as an overprecise title.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story → Rogue One – Per WP:COMMONNAME, and the in article source from Star Wars.com announcing production beginning (here) calls it Rogue One throughout, with the only exception being the way it is presented on the logo. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Per Favre's reasoning, we should follow WP:COMMONNAME here. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Per WP:COMMONNAME, as stated above. -Rmaynardjr (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support as the common, concise, and accurate name. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 17:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Edit request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a see also hatnote for Rogue Squadron and Rogue Leader (since "1" would usually mean "leader") -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Unlikely to be needed, as they are different enough to not need disambiguation. (Though using the full title as the article was at would also serve that purpose). oknazevad (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- "Rogue One" would be a character from Rogue Squadron so would be a reasonable hatnote; there is no link to the Squadron article in this article. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pretty sure they use color calls. IE Red Two, etc., not Rogue #. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- They used "Rogue #" in The Empire Strikes Back, and in prior expanded universe media, like novels and games. That's why the old video game series was titled Star Wars: Rogue Squadron. That's probably what the anon asking about disambiguation for. I think there may be a need in the future, but think this is a case where waiting to see how things shake out in the future is wise. oknazevad (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the knowledge. If we keep seeing this pop up (ie users looking for Rogue Squadron info), we can add the hatnote. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- They used "Rogue #" in The Empire Strikes Back, and in prior expanded universe media, like novels and games. That's why the old video game series was titled Star Wars: Rogue Squadron. That's probably what the anon asking about disambiguation for. I think there may be a need in the future, but think this is a case where waiting to see how things shake out in the future is wise. oknazevad (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pretty sure they use color calls. IE Red Two, etc., not Rogue #. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- "Rogue One" would be a character from Rogue Squadron so would be a reasonable hatnote; there is no link to the Squadron article in this article. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Cushing rumor
I have removed all mention of this uncorroborated rumor that appears to have originated at one British newspaper. That is to say, all other coverage of this supposed cgi resurrection is just reporting what the one paper said. There has been no confirmation whatsoever, and Cushing certainly should not be listed in the cast list. Unless something official is released, this is just an abysmal failure of WP:RUMOR and shouldn't be included. And certainly no one should be sit warring over it. oknazevad (talk) 17:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Good call.Pistongrinder (talk) 16:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 17 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Rogue One → Rogue One: A Star Wars Story – The title of this movie is somehow incorrect. The correct title should be Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose see the discussion above. Per WP:COMMONNAME. - 15:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: We just moved it here per the above discussion. - adamstom97 (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Character details
Is there a place to add Jyn's character details/criminal background as revealed in the first trailer, i.e. her "forgery of Imperial documents, possession of stolen property, aggravated assault, resisting arrest"?Pistongrinder (talk) 17:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think we should yet. We don't know when/how/why she does any of that, or if she did at all and is being framed. The last shot had her in an Imperial uniform. Did she defect, or is she infiltrating? Too many unknowns. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Forest Whitaker...
Why is he listed as a clone trooper? He doesn't look anything like Jango Fett to me... and how do we know he is called Rogue? JJsCat (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- He's not listed as a clone trooper, he's listed a veteran of the clone wars. More than just clone fought in the Clone Wars. That being said, I have no idea where they're getting all this info, they're not cited. Considering removing them actually. --82.40.171.48 (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. They should either be cited or removed. oknazevad (talk) 21:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, also, 1 or 2 of the citations given seem very speculative as opposed to actual confirmed facts. Not quite sure if they meet Wikipedia standards.
- Agreed. They should either be cited or removed. oknazevad (talk) 21:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Disney articles
- Low-importance Disney articles
- Start-Class Disney articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- Start-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- Start-Class Star Wars articles
- Low-importance Star Wars articles
- WikiProject Star Wars articles