Talk:Ms .45: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:56, 14 August 2016

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Speedy deletion notice

According to the speedy deletion notice that was originally placed here, it may be removed once the article has been fixed and no longer qualifies for a speedy. I believe I have done so by making this into a proper stub for the movie Ms. 45. 23skidoo 00:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

category cult film

The movie is popular ; also among feminists. However it isn´t a cult film. You tell me why it is one. --ThomasK 14:18, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you should explain why it is not. I don't see how a film can't be both a popular feminist film and a cult film. Also, the movie is featured in the book Cult Movies 2 by Danny Peary and that should be enough justification. See also [1], plus [2] which is an article on Ms. 45 written by a journalist who covers cult cinema. There's also [3] which refers to the film as a cult classic. An article on Abel Ferrara here discusses his "cult classic" I could go on. Here's an article that refers to it as a "certified cult film" [4] And I can cite similar examples for Avalon, too, incidentally. 23skidoo 14:24, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I mixed this one with Ms-40, similar but a short film. I did saw Ms. 45, good movie indeed. Sorry for the inconvenience. However Avalon is indeed not a cult film, if so then there must be many of movies like this be a cult film. --ThomasK 14:46, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Too short for 2 images

There are now 2 images on this page, despite the article being only one paragraph long. This article needs to be lengthened to justify 2 images. 23skidoo 18:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong title

Why do I bother, but hey: the title of the film is "Ms .45", not "Ms. 45".

189.130.201.31 (talk) 03:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==Too short for 2 images==
 There are now 2 images on this page, despite the article being only one paragraph long. This article needs to be lengthened to justify 2 images. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
+==Wrong title==
+Why do I bother, but hey: the title of the film is "Ms .45", not "Ms. 45".
+[[Special:Contributions/189.130.201.31|189.130.201.31]] ([[User talk:189.130.201.31|talk]]) 03:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)