User talk:Rupert loup: Difference between revisions
Rupert loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Request about the User:MehrdadFR: new section |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition of the hard work and integrity with which you've tackled articles. Both you and your work are truly appreciated. [[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition of the hard work and integrity with which you've tackled articles. Both you and your work are truly appreciated. [[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Request about the [[User:MehrdadFR]] == |
|||
Hello. |
|||
The [[User:MehrdadFR]] ([[User talk:MehrdadFR|talk]]) reverted your neutral edition in the article [[Hijab by country]], because he is constantly reverting neutral and third party information and sources about the hijab in Iran, and is almost exclusively using POV (that is pro-government) language about the hijab in Iran (that may contradict academic sources which have no internet links) and is relying on sources based in Iran that naturally favor the Iranian policy on the hijab (and not on all third party and academic sources), as you can see in the Iran section of that article as well as in the [[Women in Iran]] article. He uses weasel words (that are commonly used by Iranian government sources) such as "the official reveiling in 1984" in both articles about the mandatory hijab for women. I reverted his reverts and clarified the sentences. Could you check this user and warn him about his use of POV and almost the expropriation of this subject? As I can see from this user's talk page, he also has a history of edit warring with other users in various articles, and has received warnings (including from you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MehrdadFR/Archive_1&diff=721991552&oldid=719169307]). |
|||
Thank you. |
|||
[[User:SednaXV|SednaXV]] ([[User talk:SednaXV|talk]]) 16:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:07, 10 October 2016
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| In recognition of the hard work and integrity with which you've tackled articles. Both you and your work are truly appreciated. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC) |
Request about the User:MehrdadFR
Hello.
The User:MehrdadFR (talk) reverted your neutral edition in the article Hijab by country, because he is constantly reverting neutral and third party information and sources about the hijab in Iran, and is almost exclusively using POV (that is pro-government) language about the hijab in Iran (that may contradict academic sources which have no internet links) and is relying on sources based in Iran that naturally favor the Iranian policy on the hijab (and not on all third party and academic sources), as you can see in the Iran section of that article as well as in the Women in Iran article. He uses weasel words (that are commonly used by Iranian government sources) such as "the official reveiling in 1984" in both articles about the mandatory hijab for women. I reverted his reverts and clarified the sentences. Could you check this user and warn him about his use of POV and almost the expropriation of this subject? As I can see from this user's talk page, he also has a history of edit warring with other users in various articles, and has received warnings (including from you [1]).
Thank you.