Jump to content

User talk:DoctorJoeE: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DoctorJoeE/Archive 6) (bot
Korvex (talk | contribs)
→‎Reverted edit: new section
Line 146: Line 146:
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=763150211 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=763150211 -->

== Reverted edit ==

I recently made an edit that you reverted. My edit said that the marriage between Dawkins and Lalla was ended. I did not use the word 'divorced' in the edit, I used the word 'ended'. My source does in fact say that the marriage between Dawkins and Lalla was ended, it's in the very title of the article. So I don't know if this was a misunderstanding, because if you take a look at the edit you reverted, it specifically used the phrase "ended their marriage", not "divorced". If this was a misunderstanding on my phrase I'd like you to undo your revert.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 02:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:36, 16 March 2017


  • If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer on your talk page. There is no need to let me know, since I will have added your talk page to my watch list; but if you want to be sure I see it, you can ping me there, or simply drop a note on this page.
  • If you leave me a message here, I will answer here, unless you request otherwise, or I think there are particular reasons to do otherwise, and I will ping you to let you know.
  • Please add new sections to the bottom of this page, and new messages to the bottoms of their sections. New messages at the top of the page may be overlooked.
Clicking here will open a new section at the bottom of the page for a new message.
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human; I make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion.
  • While I do use the ping function a lot, as noted above, you can expedite communication by keeping my talk page on your watchlist.
  • In the interest of keeping this page relatively brief and manageable, after a section has not been edited for a month it is automatically moved to the latest archive. Links to those archives are given below. I do, of course, reserve the right to delete vandalism, trolling or other unconstructive edits without archiving them.


Current Real-Life Workload: 6.5

  • 1 = minimal work pressure
  • 5 = middling
  • > 5 = please don't count on a prompt response
  • 10 = frenzied
  • 11 = Up to 11



What is this "real life" that you speak of, and where can I download it?

Your recent edits

First of all, thank you for your excellent expansions to my additions to Poe Toaster! They made me curious about who you were, so I looked at your recent contribs and noticed an error. For the Brendan Dassey article you said that there's no such thing as unintentional homicide, and removed "intentional". However, there is unintentional, or accidental homicide, which usually receives a much lower penalty. It was a dark and stormy night. (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It was a dark and stormy night. (Love your username, BTW.) I understand your point, but the generally-accepted definition of homicide is "the deliberate killing of one person by another" (accent mine). Yes, technically, there is such a thing as "unintentional homicide" — but usually (including here), it is referred to as involuntary manslaughter, because otherwise it sounds too much like an oxymoron. Thank you for pointing it out, however. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 00:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the copy edit. I basically copy and pasted from the AP article: "April 25, 2007: After 4 1/2 hours of deliberation, the jury convicts Dassey of being party to first-degree intentional homicide, mutilation of a corpse and second-degree sexual assault. Sentencing is scheduled Aug. 2." I don't know where the AP got that phraseology from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by It was a dark and stormy night. (talkcontribs) 01:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News

Hello everyone, and welcome to the December 2016 GOCE newsletter. We had an October newsletter all set to go, but it looks like we never pushed the button to deliver it, so this one contains a few months of updates. We have been busy and successful!

Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: Nominations are open for election of Coordinators for the first half of 2017. Please visit the election page to nominate yourself or another editor, and then return after December 15 to vote. Thanks for participating!

September Drive: The September drive was fruitful. We set out to remove July through October 2015 from our backlog (an ambitious 269 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of oldest articles to just 83. We reduced our overall backlog by 97 articles, even with new copyedit tags being added to articles every day. We also handled 75% of the remaining Requests from August 2016. Overall, 19 editors recorded copy edits to 233 articles (over 378,000 words).

October Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 October; the theme was Requests, since the backlog was getting a bit long. Of the 16 editors who signed up, 10 editors completed 29 requests. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.

November Drive: The November drive was a record-breaker! We set out to remove September through December 2015 from our backlog (239 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of old articles to just 66, eliminating the two oldest months! We reduced our overall backlog by 523 articles, to a new record low of 1,414 articles, even with new tags being added to articles every day, which means we removed copy-editing tags from over 800 articles. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from October 2016. Officially, 14 editors recorded copy edits to 200 articles (over 312,000 words), but over 600 articles, usually quick fixes and short articles, were not recorded on the drive page.

Housekeeping note: we do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your Watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 20

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

  • Partner resource expansions
  • New search tool for finding TWL resources
  • #1lib1ref 2017
  • Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

Hello everyone, and welcome to the February 2017 GOCE newsletter. The Guild has been busy since the last time your coordinators sent out a newsletter!

December blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were Requests and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all who took part.

January drive: The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove December 2015 and January and February 2016 from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles, our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words).

February blitz: The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining March 2016 backlog and January 2017 requests, ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive.

Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated!

Speaking of coordinators, congratulations to Jonesey95 on their well-deserved induction into the Guild of Copy Editors Hall of Fame. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone."

Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

I recently made an edit that you reverted. My edit said that the marriage between Dawkins and Lalla was ended. I did not use the word 'divorced' in the edit, I used the word 'ended'. My source does in fact say that the marriage between Dawkins and Lalla was ended, it's in the very title of the article. So I don't know if this was a misunderstanding, because if you take a look at the edit you reverted, it specifically used the phrase "ended their marriage", not "divorced". If this was a misunderstanding on my phrase I'd like you to undo your revert.Korvex (talk) 02:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]