Jump to content

User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
[[User:Drpratikgandhi|Drpratikgandhi]] ([[User talk:Drpratikgandhi|talk]]) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Drpratikgandhi|Drpratikgandhi]] ([[User talk:Drpratikgandhi|talk]]) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Drpratikgandhi}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' – as a contested [[Wikipedia:proposed deletion|proposed deletion]], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - p --> [[User:Explicit|<font color="4B0082">'''ℯ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="483D8B">xplicit</font>]] 23:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Drpratikgandhi}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' – as a contested [[Wikipedia:proposed deletion|proposed deletion]], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - p --> [[User:Explicit|<font color="4B0082">'''ℯ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="483D8B">xplicit</font>]] 23:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

This editor also removed the international broadcast section of Love in the Moonlight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Love_in_the_Moonlight&diff=781441362&oldid=781179564
It's similar to the ones you've reverted by socks and has been a point of conflict in the page. I hope you can restore it as it's properly sourced. Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/50.67.141.33|50.67.141.33]] ([[User talk:50.67.141.33|talk]]) 05:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:40, 1 June 2017

It is approximately 7:47 AM where this user lives (South Korea). [refresh]

Wikipedia page of Jeon Jungkook

Jeon Jungkook is a Korean artist of the boy band BTS which is quite popular and deserves to have wikipedia pages of individual members. Please let us do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.59.1.84 (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Official Köppen climate classification of Spain maded by AEMET.png

Hi Explicit. I noticed you deleted File:Official Köppen climate classification of Spain maded by AEMET.png as replaceable fair use. I just thought you should be aware of WP:ANI#Repeated fair use violations because it has to do with that particular file and includes some discussion as to whether the file can actually be replaced. There is also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 29#File:Official Köppen climate classification of Spain maded by AEMET.png which is still ongoing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Pretty blatant violation of WP:NFCC#1, even in light of those two discussions. I supposed I should expect to be yelled at for it, but I'll clarify now that I have zero intention in restoring the file. This actually reminds me of File:2015 Russian Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown Turkey claim.jpg (the first black map), which I deleted under a similar basis. A free image existed (File:Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown Syrian-Turkey border.svg) as one does for this topic (File:Spain map of Köppen climate classification.svg), I deleted it under the same criteria, was taken to DRV for it, which resulted in it being listed for deletion and ultimately deleted anyway. My sound judgment there is no different here. xplicit 01:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just for reference, I wasn't implying the deletion was wrong; I just wasn't sure if you were aware that there's been some heated discussion of this file at two separate noticeboards. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why on earth have you deleted the file??? Your response does not even have any content or argument. This is very poor behavior for an admin.Asilah1981 (talk) 11:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilah1981: My deletion rationale says it all: it was deleted as replaceable fair use. It's almost impossible to justify the use of a non-free map, as free alternatives can easily be created. Pointing out a similar situation is entirely in context, as it shows: 1) how strict WP:NFCC is; 2) how you shouldn't waste the community's time. xplicit 00:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had you read the discussion properly, you would have realized that a free alternative cannot be created, not easily not difficultly. I suggest you reconsider your position and re-read what the issue was about. We do not have access to the AEMET data set and cannot replicate the map. In any case, this matter should be escalated. I don't think barging into am ongoing discussion and taking unilateral action is what Admins are for. Asilah1981 (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! About the file in the subject, we received an OTRS permission. Can you confirm me that there's a photographer, different from the subject of the photograph? Thank you. --Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: Hi, no photographer is mentioned in the file's description. It simply reads: "Personal Headshot, Fair use. {{Arielle Tepper Madover}}". xplicit 23:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Meanwhile, I clarified the situation, and the user had uploaded another version on Commons (Arielle Tepper Madover.jpg). Maybe you'll want to delete the talk page of the file. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 07:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files for deletion

Greetings Explicit! I think a couple of files from a recent mass deletion request were inadvertently missed - File:Dickebusch New Mil and Ext CWGC 1848216632.jpg and File:Lighting heating cooking power - Northmet Power and Light.jpg. Many thanks - Kelly hi! 21:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelly: Whoops, taken care of. Thanks. xplicit 00:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Rock on the Range lineups by year deletion

This page should have not been deleted and I would have been more than happy to contest it. Many music festivals feature a layout such as this to display the lineups in an easy to read manner, and to also provide quantitative data to those looking for it (which bands played, how many played, number of times played, last played, etc.). This page should be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.151.103 (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No it should not. It duplicates the article on the main page and neither is well-sourced. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Aek Chabhi Hai Padoss Mein"

Dear admin, i really would like to get back information about this page since i am quiet attached with this serial. and infact i had checked it week just before its deletion. Daily i am watching its episodes available on Metasvideos and i am interested in knowing star cast episode wise which was nicely mentioned on this page of wikipedia. Drpratikgandhi (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drpratikgandhi: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. xplicit 23:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This editor also removed the international broadcast section of Love in the Moonlight. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Love_in_the_Moonlight&diff=781441362&oldid=781179564 It's similar to the ones you've reverted by socks and has been a point of conflict in the page. I hope you can restore it as it's properly sourced. Thanks! 50.67.141.33 (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]