Jump to content

User talk:Saudmujadidi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Tag: wikilove
Line 90: Line 90:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Writes clean with less or no spelling or grammatical errors. [[User:SpeakTruth!|SpeakTruth!]] ([[User talk:SpeakTruth!|talk]]) 19:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Writes clean with less or no spelling or grammatical errors. [[User:SpeakTruth!|SpeakTruth!]] ([[User talk:SpeakTruth!|talk]]) 19:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Single-purpose account ==

{{ping|Saudmujadidi}} Just take a look, [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]], [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account]], [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]], [[WP:FAMILY]], [[WP:MTPPT]], [[WP:SOCKING]], [[Wikipedia:Respect privacy]], [[Wikipedia:Oversight]], [[WP:BULLY]]. [[Special:Contributions/72.52.87.49|72.52.87.49]] ([[User talk:72.52.87.49|talk]]) 09:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:15, 22 August 2017


January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abdul-Qadir Gilani has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, Saudmujadidi. You have new messages at ClueBot Commons's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I see what you did there

I don't know if you have any sort of connection to MSOAMU but all the same, you're attempts to use Wikipedia as a propaganda vehicle for the Barelvi movement will fail. If you have any sincerity in regard to actually wanting to improve the encyclopedia, go read WP:IRS and WP:NPOV before randomly reverting without discussion again. If you continue the way you are now, then things will not end up well for you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shah Turab ul Haq has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Anjana Larka 07:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Masud Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yintan  10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mention the content which is copyright dear, --Saudmujadidi (talk) 06:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC) I never used any content from this website: https://riathuddin.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/faiz-e-raza-sayedi-ala-hazrat-imam-ahmad-raza-khan-r-a/ You might have some confusion regarding , this or there may be someone else using this content.--Saudmujadidi (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Khadim Hussain Rizvi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Khadim Hussain Rizvi, Saudmujadidi!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please look over Khadim Hussain Rizvi - it's at risk of deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khadim Hussain Rizvi

The article Khadim Hussain Rizvi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

When you change a sentence like:

"Unlike most other Muslim movements in the region, the Barelvis opposed the Indian independence movement "

to:

"Unlike most other Muslim movements in the region, the Barelvis supported the Indian independence movement"

you need to provide more explanation than "Added few details". I noticed that some of what you changed had citations.

When you correct errors in Wikipedia, please provide explanations for why you are doing it: e.g. the source says.... There is an article talk page for each article that you can use to explain things on.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barelvi

Hi-- Some of your edits to Barelvi added properly sourced content, but they also removed or changed properly sourced content, which we are not allowed to do per WP:NPOV. According to this policy, when there is disagreement between reliable sources, all the views need to be represented proportionally. You're welcome to reincorporate the additional material in a policy-compliant way. However, please make sure the sources meet the criteria of WP:RS and are properly cited (WP:CITEHOW). In particular, book citations need to include page numbers. Eperoton (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Darul Uloom Amjadia

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Saudmujadidi, thanks for creating Darul Uloom Amjadia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. "millions of Scholars" seems hyperbolic. Please stick to the facts and reference independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Writes clean with less or no spelling or grammatical errors. SpeakTruth! (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Single-purpose account

@Saudmujadidi: Just take a look, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Single-purpose account, Wikipedia:Canvassing, WP:FAMILY, WP:MTPPT, WP:SOCKING, Wikipedia:Respect privacy, Wikipedia:Oversight, WP:BULLY. 72.52.87.49 (talk) 09:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]