Jump to content

Kampot Zoo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Socerb102 (talk | contribs)
Added a controversies section. I want to add to the rest of the article too, because it's a bit unbalanced like this.
Socerb102 (talk | contribs)
Added line in general
Line 26: Line 26:
In 2006 the Zoo housed over 150 animals of 52 species, and added four hippopotamuses, four zebras and several ostriches .<ref name="b">[http://www.cambodiadaily.com/archives/official-buys-exotic-african-animals-for-zoo-51928/ "Official Buys Exotic African Animals for Zoo"]. Cambodia daily. Accessed March 02, 2014.</ref>
In 2006 the Zoo housed over 150 animals of 52 species, and added four hippopotamuses, four zebras and several ostriches .<ref name="b">[http://www.cambodiadaily.com/archives/official-buys-exotic-african-animals-for-zoo-51928/ "Official Buys Exotic African Animals for Zoo"]. Cambodia daily. Accessed March 02, 2014.</ref>


In 2011, Kampot Zoo cooperated with [[Phnom Tamao Wildlife Rescue Centre]] to improve animal facilities and work routines in the Zoo.<ref name="c">[http://wildlifealliance.org/page/view/233/update-from-teuk-chhou-zoo-/ "Update from Teuk Chhou Zoo"]. Wildlife Alliance. Accessed March 02, 2014.</ref>
In 2011, Kampot Zoo cooperated with [[Phnom Tamao Wildlife Rescue Centre]] to improve animal facilities and work routines in the Zoo.<ref name="c">[http://wildlifealliance.org/page/view/233/update-from-teuk-chhou-zoo-/ "Update from Teuk Chhou Zoo"]. Wildlife Alliance. Accessed March 02, 2014.</ref>An article published in 2011 talking about the poor condition of the animals at the zoo prompted a couple of Australian expats to invest in the facilities of the park under an NGO called footprint. The cooperation between Kampot Zoo and Footprint came to an end in 2012, only one year after the start of the cooperation.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />


== Controversies ==
== Controversies ==
Line 33: Line 33:
One of the first public report on the situation in the zoo was published in the [[The Phnom Penh Post|Phnom Penh Post]] in 2011, where the journalist pointed the state in which the animal lived, with habitat or cages that were too small, skinny and sick animals, feces on the ground and not enough food. In the article, the owner of the zoo blames NGO and the governement for not giving him money to run its operations. The article sparked outrage in the zoological community and many NGO, individuals and compagnies started getting involved to help the zoo. Another article in the Phnomh Penh Post even stated in 2012 that the zoo was in a better state.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rikitikitavi-kampot.com/sights-activities/teuk-chhou-zoo/|title=Teuk Chhou Zoo|last=Rikitikitavi|first=|date=2013|website=RikiTavi|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/zoo-horrors|title=The Zoo of Horrors|last=Miller|first=Adam|date=2011-03-27|work=Phnomh Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref>
One of the first public report on the situation in the zoo was published in the [[The Phnom Penh Post|Phnom Penh Post]] in 2011, where the journalist pointed the state in which the animal lived, with habitat or cages that were too small, skinny and sick animals, feces on the ground and not enough food. In the article, the owner of the zoo blames NGO and the governement for not giving him money to run its operations. The article sparked outrage in the zoological community and many NGO, individuals and compagnies started getting involved to help the zoo. Another article in the Phnomh Penh Post even stated in 2012 that the zoo was in a better state.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rikitikitavi-kampot.com/sights-activities/teuk-chhou-zoo/|title=Teuk Chhou Zoo|last=Rikitikitavi|first=|date=2013|website=RikiTavi|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/zoo-horrors|title=The Zoo of Horrors|last=Miller|first=Adam|date=2011-03-27|work=Phnomh Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref>


The owner had given the management of the zoo to the NGO Footprint in 2012, an NGO created by a couple of Australian expat living in Cambodia. Footprint was created for the sole purpose of helping the zoo. Footprint was financing the baseline operation, renovating enclosures and caring for the animals, and Wildlife Alliance provided healthcare for the animals. The situation was getting better, and many media praised the new orientation of the zoo. But division between in the orientation for the park between the owner and the NGO after a dispute on an unknown subject broke the partnership.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.asialifemagazine.com/cambodia/teuk-chhou-wildlife-park-zoo/|title=TEUK CHHOU WILDLIFE EDUCATION PARK|last=|first=|date=|website=Cambodia AsiaLife|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.simontoffanello.com/blog/kampot-zoo|title=KAMPOT ZOO|last=Toffanello|first=Simon|date=2014-07-17|website=SIMON TOFFANELLO|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/kampot-zoo-back-trouble|title=Kampot Zoo Back in Trouble|last=Sokheng|first=Vong|date=2013-02-13|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|last2=Drennan|first2=Justine}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://camwatchblogs.blogspot.ca/2012/10/couple-brings-zoo-back-to-life.html|title=Couple brings zoo back to life|last=Drennan|first=Justine|date=2012-10-30|website=Phnom Penh Post (Primary source)|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref>
The owner had given the management of the zoo to the NGO Footprint in 2012, an NGO created by a couple of Australian expat living in Cambodia. Footprint was created for the sole purpose of helping the zoo. Footprint was financing the baseline operation, renovating enclosures and caring for the animals, and Wildlife Alliance provided healthcare for the animals. The situation was getting better, and many media praised the new orientation of the zoo. But division between in the orientation for the park between the owner and the NGO after a dispute on an unknown subject broke the partnership.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.asialifemagazine.com/cambodia/teuk-chhou-wildlife-park-zoo/|title=TEUK CHHOU WILDLIFE EDUCATION PARK|last=|first=|date=|website=Cambodia AsiaLife|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.simontoffanello.com/blog/kampot-zoo|title=KAMPOT ZOO|last=Toffanello|first=Simon|date=2014-07-17|website=SIMON TOFFANELLO|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/kampot-zoo-back-trouble|title=Kampot Zoo Back in Trouble|last=Sokheng|first=Vong|date=2013-02-13|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|last2=Drennan|first2=Justine}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=http://camwatchblogs.blogspot.ca/2012/10/couple-brings-zoo-back-to-life.html|title=Couple brings zoo back to life|last=Drennan|first=Justine|date=2012-10-30|website=Phnom Penh Post (Primary source)|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref>


In autumn 2015, many ONG invested in animal care and rehabilitation un South-East Asia raises concerns when the zoo announced they were swapping their two elephants for endangered white tigers from the Japanese Hirakawa Zoo. The two elephants were still under the care of EARS Asia, a conservation group based in Hong Kong who paided for the elephants enclosure, the food, and the employee who cared for them. The direction of the zoo decided to expulse EARS and its employees from its premises. The NGO relitaliated by creating a campaign to urge the government to stop the exchange. NGOs from both South-East Asia (EARS Asia, Footprint, Wildlife Alliance) and from Japan (Voice for Zoos Animals) condemned the exchange, stating the elephants would suffer in their new enclosure. The NGOs questioned the motive behind the exchange, stating there was no conversation value to it. The  Cambodia Wildlife Sanctuary  offered to take the pair of elephant to give them a chance to be released, but the owner of the zoo refused the offer. The swapping was finnally canceled in April 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/elephants-will-suffer-japan-zoo|title=Elephants will Suffer in Japan Zoo|last=Parkinson|first=Charles|date=2015-09-15|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|publisher=|last2=Seangly|first2=Phak}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/fears-over-zoo-swap|title=Fears Over Zoo Swap|last=Charles|first=Parkinson|date=2015-08-27|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|last2=Seangly|first2=Phak}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/elephants-underfed-kampot-zoo-expert|title=Elephants Underfed in Kampot Zoo, say Expert|last=Parkinson|first=Charles|date=2015-10-29|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.khmertimeskh.com/news/16220/carers-barred-from----nightmare-zoo---s----elephants/|title=Carers Barred from ‘Nightmare Zoo’s’ Elephants|last=Cox|first=Johnathan|date=2015-09-27|work=Khmer Time|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.zoowatch.org/kiriandseilacampaign|title=#FreeKiriAndSeila TO THE CAMBODIA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY|last=|first=|date=|website=Zoo-Watche|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref>
In autumn 2015, many ONG invested in animal care and rehabilitation un South-East Asia raises concerns when the zoo announced they were swapping their two elephants for endangered white tigers from the Japanese Hirakawa Zoo. The two elephants were still under the care of EARS Asia, a conservation group based in Hong Kong who paided for the elephants enclosure, the food, and the employee who cared for them. The direction of the zoo decided to expulse EARS and its employees from its premises. The NGO relitaliated by creating a campaign to urge the government to stop the exchange. NGOs from both South-East Asia (EARS Asia, Footprint, Wildlife Alliance) and from Japan (Voice for Zoos Animals) condemned the exchange, stating the elephants would suffer in their new enclosure. The NGOs questioned the motive behind the exchange, stating there was no conversation value to it. The  Cambodia Wildlife Sanctuary  offered to take the pair of elephant to give them a chance to be released, but the owner of the zoo refused the offer. The swapping was finnally canceled in April 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/elephants-will-suffer-japan-zoo|title=Elephants will Suffer in Japan Zoo|last=Parkinson|first=Charles|date=2015-09-15|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|publisher=|last2=Seangly|first2=Phak}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/fears-over-zoo-swap|title=Fears Over Zoo Swap|last=Charles|first=Parkinson|date=2015-08-27|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|last2=Seangly|first2=Phak}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/elephants-underfed-kampot-zoo-expert|title=Elephants Underfed in Kampot Zoo, say Expert|last=Parkinson|first=Charles|date=2015-10-29|work=Phnom Penh Post|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.khmertimeskh.com/news/16220/carers-barred-from----nightmare-zoo---s----elephants/|title=Carers Barred from ‘Nightmare Zoo’s’ Elephants|last=Cox|first=Johnathan|date=2015-09-27|work=Khmer Time|access-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.zoowatch.org/kiriandseilacampaign|title=#FreeKiriAndSeila TO THE CAMBODIA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY|last=|first=|date=|website=Zoo-Watche|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2017-08-30}}</ref>

Revision as of 18:34, 5 September 2017

Kampot Zoo
Map
Date opened2000
LocationKampot, Cambodia
Land area23 hectares
No. of animals150
No. of species52
OwnerNhim Vanda

Kampot Zoo (Teuk Chhou Waterfall Crop Garden and Zoo) is about 10 km from the provincial town of Kampot, Cambodia. The Zoo was established in 1999, and opened in 2000 by senator Nhim Vanda, who as of 2014 owned it and Bayap Zoo in Prey Veng Province’s Kamchay Mear District.[1]

Spanning over 23 hectares, it is the second-largest zoo in Cambodia.

In 2006 the Zoo housed over 150 animals of 52 species, and added four hippopotamuses, four zebras and several ostriches .[2]

In 2011, Kampot Zoo cooperated with Phnom Tamao Wildlife Rescue Centre to improve animal facilities and work routines in the Zoo.[3]An article published in 2011 talking about the poor condition of the animals at the zoo prompted a couple of Australian expats to invest in the facilities of the park under an NGO called footprint. The cooperation between Kampot Zoo and Footprint came to an end in 2012, only one year after the start of the cooperation.[4][5]

Controversies

The zoo has been criticized many times for the poor condition in which the animal live.

One of the first public report on the situation in the zoo was published in the Phnom Penh Post in 2011, where the journalist pointed the state in which the animal lived, with habitat or cages that were too small, skinny and sick animals, feces on the ground and not enough food. In the article, the owner of the zoo blames NGO and the governement for not giving him money to run its operations. The article sparked outrage in the zoological community and many NGO, individuals and compagnies started getting involved to help the zoo. Another article in the Phnomh Penh Post even stated in 2012 that the zoo was in a better state.[6][7]

The owner had given the management of the zoo to the NGO Footprint in 2012, an NGO created by a couple of Australian expat living in Cambodia. Footprint was created for the sole purpose of helping the zoo. Footprint was financing the baseline operation, renovating enclosures and caring for the animals, and Wildlife Alliance provided healthcare for the animals. The situation was getting better, and many media praised the new orientation of the zoo. But division between in the orientation for the park between the owner and the NGO after a dispute on an unknown subject broke the partnership.[8][9][4][5]

In autumn 2015, many ONG invested in animal care and rehabilitation un South-East Asia raises concerns when the zoo announced they were swapping their two elephants for endangered white tigers from the Japanese Hirakawa Zoo. The two elephants were still under the care of EARS Asia, a conservation group based in Hong Kong who paided for the elephants enclosure, the food, and the employee who cared for them. The direction of the zoo decided to expulse EARS and its employees from its premises. The NGO relitaliated by creating a campaign to urge the government to stop the exchange. NGOs from both South-East Asia (EARS Asia, Footprint, Wildlife Alliance) and from Japan (Voice for Zoos Animals) condemned the exchange, stating the elephants would suffer in their new enclosure. The NGOs questioned the motive behind the exchange, stating there was no conversation value to it. The  Cambodia Wildlife Sanctuary  offered to take the pair of elephant to give them a chance to be released, but the owner of the zoo refused the offer. The swapping was finnally canceled in April 2016.[10][11][12][13][14]

EARS Asia launched the Zoo-Watch initiative in 2016 to urge the government of Cambodia to close both Kampot zoo and Bayap Zoo, both owned by the same owner. Reports from both the NGO and media stated that the animals were still living in subpar or even dangerous conditions.[15]

References

  1. ^ "Official Buys Exotic African Animals for Zoo". Cambodia Daily. Accessed March 02, 2014.
  2. ^ "Official Buys Exotic African Animals for Zoo". Cambodia daily. Accessed March 02, 2014.
  3. ^ "Update from Teuk Chhou Zoo". Wildlife Alliance. Accessed March 02, 2014.
  4. ^ a b Sokheng, Vong; Drennan, Justine (2013-02-13). "Kampot Zoo Back in Trouble". Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ a b Drennan, Justine (2012-10-30). "Couple brings zoo back to life". Phnom Penh Post (Primary source). Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  6. ^ Rikitikitavi (2013). "Teuk Chhou Zoo". RikiTavi. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  7. ^ Miller, Adam (2011-03-27). "The Zoo of Horrors". Phnomh Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  8. ^ "TEUK CHHOU WILDLIFE EDUCATION PARK". Cambodia AsiaLife. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  9. ^ Toffanello, Simon (2014-07-17). "KAMPOT ZOO". SIMON TOFFANELLO. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  10. ^ Parkinson, Charles; Seangly, Phak (2015-09-15). "Elephants will Suffer in Japan Zoo". Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  11. ^ Charles, Parkinson; Seangly, Phak (2015-08-27). "Fears Over Zoo Swap". Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  12. ^ Parkinson, Charles (2015-10-29). "Elephants Underfed in Kampot Zoo, say Expert". Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  13. ^ Cox, Johnathan (2015-09-27). "Carers Barred from 'Nightmare Zoo's' Elephants". Khmer Time. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  14. ^ "#FreeKiriAndSeila TO THE CAMBODIA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY". Zoo-Watche. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  15. ^ Rollet, Charles; Sotheary, Pech (2016-01-18). "Zoo Watch' seeks local zoos' closure". Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

-