Talk:AVIC AG600: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:54, 24 December 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AVIC AG600 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Firefighting Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Transport: Maritime Unassessed

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force.

China Unassessed

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photo

I'm sure the Chinese are well capable of the production of the craft, but more proof is needed.174.125.73.246 (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do they not have a camera? No cell phone camera? in this day and age nothing is verified without a photo. Maybe they hide something? Is it just another knockoff from the west?174.125.73.246 (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who built it?

The article currently cannot make up its mind whether AVIC or CAIGA built the prototype. Which is correct? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was built by CAIGA. CAIGA is a subsidiary of AVIC. 安眠3 (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And it was assisted by other members of AVIC. 安眠3 (talk) 17:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. did CAIGA design it as well? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Size of Aircraft

The AG600 is not the largest flying amphibious aircraft in the world, It is The largest amphibious aircraft in production right now.

The Martin Mars is the largest flying right now, And made a flight last year according to your Martin Mars article and has had flights these year.(68.189.53.222 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 And it was assisted by other members of AVIC. [[User:安眠3|安眠3]] ([[User talk:安眠3|talk]]) 17:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 :Thank you. did CAIGA design it as well? &mdash; Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 19:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
+== Size of Aircraft ==
+ The AG600 is not the largest flying amphibious aircraft in the world, It is The largest amphibious aircraft in production right now.
+The Martin Mars is the largest flying right now, And made a flight last year according to your Martin Mars article and has had flights these year.([[Special:Contributions/68.189.53.222|68.189.53.222]] ([[User talk:68.189.53.222|talk]]) 19:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC))