User talk:Wasabi,the,one: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:27, 6 April 2018

July 2016

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to DNCE seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Slashme (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wasabi,the,one, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wasabi,the,one! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew Healy, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 17:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –Davey2010^Talk 23:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like it or nor consensus at the AFD was to Redirect so might I suggest you accept the consensus and move on ? ..... You either accept it or carry on reverting where you'll then end up blocked.... Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 23:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 02:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Please get a consensus on the Talk page before moving articles, as that could be seen as disruptive, especially to one that has had the amount of editing that BSA has. Thanks! Crow^Caw 16:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VR

Hi, I noticed you redirected VR to Virtual reality. There were other meanings on the disambiguation page VR which a person searching the acronym might easily be looking for, so I have undone your edit. From the above, it looks like you may be attempting to make a WP:POINT due to a dispute about another article you were involved in which was redirected. Please note that such pointmaking is disruptive and may lead to a block; if you genuinely believe VR should be redirected to Virtual reality, please start a discussion on the talk page. Thanks, Intelligentsium 20:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beal-Gaillard House

I wanted to let you know that while you placed an AFD notice on Beal-Gaillard House, it looks like you forgot to create the deletion discussion page for it. clpo13_(talk) 21:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have initiated deletion discussions on a number of clearly notable articles. This is a waste of the communities time. Agathoclea (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC):Many of the articles I nominated to delete were not notable. they were one sentence descriptions and that was as much writing that they could get. The consensus was to keep although. Wasabi,the,one (talk)[reply]

Please re-read the policies. The content and size of an article has no bearing on the notability of the article subject. A too small article may not assert that notability by omitting key facts. But when these facts are stated, starting the deletion process, especially in larger numbers, can be viewed as disruptive. Agathoclea (talk) 15:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC): As I said before, they were small and had no resources available to verify anything more than what was already there. Wasabi,the,one[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Agathoclea (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Wasabi~~ Agathoclea explained it well. Before you start nominating anything for AFD again, you need to become more familiar with policy. If you keep nominating articles that are speedy kept as obviously notable, you are likely to be topic banned or blocked for disruptive editing. It wastes a lot of people's time when you do that. Your best bet is simply to stop nominating articles for AFD altogether. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dennis Brown: I think you meant Agathoclea. Nice to see you back, BTW. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you, and yes. Corrected. Not on my usual device. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suggestions

Wasabi,the,one ('Talk' Contributions 16:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
4,145	Radiohead (talk)	Add sources
9	Poestenkill, New York (talk)	Add sources
15	Venturer Scout (talk)	Add sources
175	Capital District (talk)	Add sources
155	Carl and the Passions – "So Tough" (talk)	Add sources
287	Boogie Down Productions (talk)	Add sources
2,804	Augmented reality (talk)	Cleanup
300	Head-mounted display (talk)	Cleanup
1,185	Samsung Gear VR (talk)	Cleanup
517	Phalanx bone (talk)	Expand
91	Rensselaer County, New York (talk)	Expand
66	Pfaff (talk)	Expand
334	PBS NewsHour (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
219	Friends (The Beach Boys album) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
21	Ease (sewing) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
269	Mixed reality (talk)	Merge
2,485	Punk rock (talk)	Merge
15	Body of ulna (talk)	Merge
11	Fabric tube turning (talk)	Wikify
53	Omnidirectional treadmill (talk)	Wikify
119	Charles Blondin (talk)	Wikify
38	BaDoinkVR (talk)	Orphan
2	Alonzo B. May (talk)	Orphan
3	Arrianus (jurist) (talk)	Orphan
32	Bernina International (talk)	Stub
49	Pink Triangle (song) (talk)	Stub
27	Pad stitch (talk)	Stub
14	Sewmor (talk)	Stub
71	Blind stitch (talk)	Stub
12	Tapemaster (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Last Hero 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survivor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

Hi there, I've reverted your edit to Wikipedia as you did not create the relevant nomination page within a reasonable time. Please feel free to revert me if you intend to create the AfD nomination -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 15:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually don't. You did create the nomination page, but that creation was reverted. This is apparently a troll nomination. Don't do it again.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.pindula.co.zw/Zimbabwe_United_Passenger_Company

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Africa Destubathon

Hi, good work with this project! This is just a reminder to add the articles you've destubbed to the individual country's list as well as the main list. You might win a country, but not if you dont follow that step. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,ill get to it right now Wasabi,the,one (Talk Contributions) 00:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atuot people

What's with the "poop"? Was this a test? utcursch | talk 00:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nilotic peoples and languages

I commend your enthusiasm but please refrain from making sectarian (see Atuot people) or ultranationalist (Balanda Bviri people) edits from a Luo POV. In the case of the Balanda, only the Balanda Bor speak a Luo language (itself a pidgin reflexed by the Viri language but retaining a Luo grammar and core vocabulary). Balanda Viri is recognized by linguists and the oral record as being the senior language in the contact. Both groups live to together in the hills of Western Bahr-al-Ghazal as a single "nation". The Boor are invariably bilingual, the Bviri are not. I've reverted your edits for this reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lestadii27 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Day of Reconciliation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Day of Reconciliation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasabi,the,one -- Wasabi,the,one (talk) 03:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you are not supposed to open a review of your own GA nomination; an independent reviewer will come along eventually and start a review, at which point you will want to respond to any issues that are raised by said reviewer. The review page you opened yesterday has since been deleted. Best of luck with your nomination! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on talk:Day of Reconciliation--WriterArtistDC (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
148	Luo peoples (talk)	Add sources
5	Angakuei (talk)	Add sources
51	Flag of the Central African Republic (talk)	Add sources
288	Timeline of World War II (1945) (talk)	Add sources
151	Tricolour (flag) (talk)	Add sources
217	The Dream Synopsis (talk)	Add sources
32	Flag of Western Sahara (talk)	Cleanup
48	Pokomo people (talk)	Cleanup
123	Evangelicalism in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
445	Brazilian cuisine (talk)	Expand
31	Scouting in Ohio (talk)	Expand
14	Scouting in North Carolina (talk)	Expand
610	Political colour (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,982	Baptists (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
93	Kisii people (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
50	Flag of Burkina Faso (talk)	Merge
390	Tournament (talk)	Merge
494	Single-elimination tournament (talk)	Merge
5	Ngok Lual Yak (talk)	Wikify
4	Twic East County (talk)	Wikify
37	Kuria people (talk)	Wikify
3	Maalia people (talk)	Orphan
2	Luka Anthony Ubur (talk)	Orphan
2	Kowich (talk)	Orphan
12	Western Nilotic languages (talk)	Stub
5	Jur Mananger people (talk)	Stub
7	Kara people (talk)	Stub
13	Flag and coat of arms of Mayotte (talk)	Stub
52	Luo languages (talk)	Stub
3	Jur Beli people (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Act, 2005

Hi, can you try to source this? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work. The key to this contest though is sorting out sourcing. Can you try to avoid submitting articles which still have unsourced claims and tags? Check that each paragraph is sourced, any material you can't source just remove the info. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TADE

Howdy, Wasabi,the,one. I am Redolta, a competitor in The Africa Destubathon for South Sudan, and I have a question. I noticed you included seven entries in your list for South Sudan, and none of the seven was approved by Dr. Blofeld. Since then, you have not edited those articles since. So my question is, are you still going to work on those? And if not, can I branch off what you contributed and submit the entry? I am asking this before I go ahead and do it, because I don't want to sabotage your work so I gain advantage. I have a plan, so I propose 3 options you can decide:

Hand over the rights for me to edit and earn the points, but I must give a lot of credit to you.
Hand over the rights for me to edit, but we split even the points so I don't sabotage your work and I don't get full credit (without consent).
Hand over no rights at all for me to edit or earn points.

If I do not get a response by the end of the day (UTC) on 18 November, I will have to ask someone else. Note that if you choose options 1 or 2, they may be needing approval by Dr. Blofeld. Thanks, good luck for you in WP:TAD, and have a nice day. Redolta📱 ^Contribs 01:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wasabi,the,one. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFA

Wasabi, I'm sorry to inform you that I have reverted your Request for Adminship. Bluntly, you are far too early in your wikicareer to entertain the idea, although of course I admire your enthusiam- and bravery! But with less than 400 article-space edits and six months' tenure, you simply do not have the experience required at this time. Unfortunately the fact that you were not able to correctly lodge the application highlights the inadvisability of proceeding with it. May I suggest that you read around WP:Miniguide to requests for adminship, and- in a year or two, no sooner- present yourself at WP:ORCP, where you can get honest but accurate advice on your chances of passing RfA from seasoned editors. It may take even longer than that to erase the memory, and impact, of this, though. Take care, O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 17:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of East poestenkill

Hello, Wasabi,the,one. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, East poestenkill, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The impossible quiz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The impossible quiz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Stikkyy (talk) (contributions) 23:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Day of Reconciliation

The article Day of Reconciliation you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Day of Reconciliation for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 02:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Day of Reconciliation

The article Day of Reconciliation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Day of Reconciliation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Kbseah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Poestenkill (CDP), New York seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kbseah (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect transclusion of your Rfa

Quick note. I have had to undo your addition to the Rfa page because of the fact that you had transcluded the Rfa incorrectly. Good faith advice – don't do this right now. You don't have enough experience in Wikipedia's various maintenance areas, your tenure, and general editorial interactions with other editors. Please get an experienced nominator who would vet you, as I feel you might not understand the expectations in current Rfas from candidates. Ask me for any assistance. Thanks. Lourdes 02:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:UnderArmourKid

Why did you move User talk:UnderArmourKid to User talk:UnderArmourLid? (I've moved it back now, because the account name is UnderArmourKid). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wasabi,the,one. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

West Sand Lake

Its not a town. Sand Lake is a town. It contains the hamlet of West Sand Lake. Famartin (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arizona. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The PlayStation listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The PlayStation. Since you had some involvement with the The PlayStation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Senate election in Texas, 2018. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 20:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States Senate election in Texas, 2018, you may be blocked from editing. Mélencron (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of March For Our Lives Albany

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on March For Our Lives Albany requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 01:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For further context, while March For Our Lives is obviously a significant and important event, its sister/local events are not, unless they receive significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 01:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ryan Deitsch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ryan Deitsch.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Alfonso Calderon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alfonso Calderon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:March For Our Lives Binghamton.jpg

The file File:March For Our Lives Binghamton.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free image being used in a list article. Fails WP:NFCC#8

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 00:48, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:March For Our Lives Rochester.jpg

The file File:March For Our Lives Rochester.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free image being used in a list article. Fails WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:March For Our Lives Cobleskill.jpg

The file File:March For Our Lives Cobleskill.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free image being used in a list article. Fails WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:March For Our Lives Buffalo.jpg

The file File:March For Our Lives Buffalo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free image being used in a list article. Fails WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Wasabi,the,one (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

Block ID: #8304892 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: Alexf (talk • blocks)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tronald-Drumpf". The reason given for Tronald-Drumpf's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=This is not me. I am an experienced editor. I also believe the blocked user should be unblocked, as I have looked into the block. ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ".

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Wasabi,the,one}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Alexf | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tronald-Drumpf". The reason given for Tronald-Drumpf's block is: "
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=This is not me. I am an experienced editor. I also believe the blocked user should be unblocked, as I have looked into the block. ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

".</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=8304892 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tronald-Drumpf". The reason given for Tronald-Drumpf's block is: "
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=This is not me. I am an experienced editor. I also believe the blocked user should be unblocked, as I have looked into the block. ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

".</nowiki> | 3=Alexf | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tronald-Drumpf". The reason given for Tronald-Drumpf's block is: "
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=This is not me. I am an experienced editor. I also believe the blocked user should be unblocked, as I have looked into the block. ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

".</nowiki> | 3=Alexf | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 970: / Line 970: @@
 {{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tronald-Drumpf". The reason given for Tronald-Drumpf's block is: "
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
-We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.
+We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=This is not me. I am an experienced editor. I also believe the blocked user should be unblocked, as I have looked into the block. ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.
 ".</nowiki>|3=Alexf|4=8304892}}