Talk:MGM Home Entertainment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:06, 28 October 2018

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Stub‑class

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"The Film Journal, Volume 97, Issues 1-6". Retrieved February 14, 2017.

MGM (Means Great Movies)

Can someone add the part of the brand MGM (Means Great Movies) for MGM Home Entertainment? King Shadeed 17:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Merge - What little there is of Soul Cinema doesn't really need it's own page. JohnnyMrNinja 17:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the "new deal" with Turner

The part that says 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment have signed a deal to release pre-1986 MGM films and pre-1952 UA films needs a source from whoever wrote that because I'm not sure that's even true. I have tried searching for this bit of news elsewhere on the internet and I cannot find anything. So whoever put that bit in, please tell me where you got that information from.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MGM Home Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/robertharris/harris102504.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140111225622/http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/mgm-re-ups-dvd-deal-with-fox-through-2016/ to http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/mgm-re-ups-dvd-deal-with-fox-through-2016/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://social.entertainment.msn.com/movies/blogs/videodrone-blogpost.aspx?post=93fbd064-3428-4033-9831-964260f9dfeb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

88.106.210.33 (talk) 09:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 09:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MGM Home Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150418181628/http://scream-it-loud.com/interviews/david-schmoeller/ to http://scream-it-loud.com/interviews/david-schmoeller/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can someone please add "Olive Films" and "TGG Direct" on the list in the "Licensors" section? 31.210.91.73 (talk) 07:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bump 31.210.91.73 (talk) 12:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

190.206.168.158 (talk) 05:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: Neither licensor currently has their own article but the second at least appears notable based on the 'Philadelphia Inquirer' reference. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

165.76.145.156 (talk) 04:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added references only demonstrate bare existence, not notability, or Olive Films. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But this is all I can find, and the titles that the articles listed are MGM-owned titles that are licensed to Olive for DVD/Blu-ray release. The comments on two of the Blu-ray.com articles here mentioned MGM. 154.68.5.60 (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bump (You're supposed to add this company back with one of these references. If you don't believe me, then just RECREATE the Olive Films article, for Christ sakes.) 149.167.40.161 (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You wouldn't happen to be Nate Speed, would you? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: No notability established Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:59, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2018

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at MGM Home Entertainment. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Just because Disney is buying Fox and Universal Pictures Home Entertainment will distribute Operation Finale and Bond 25 and maybe a couple of other new MGM films on home media doesn't mean that Universal will replace Fox as the overall home entertainment distributor of MGM's library and select new releases. MGM also has other partners that they co-produced some films with like Warner Bros., Sony and Paramount handle physical home entertainment distribution of not only the co-produced films, but also a couple of MGM's 2018 film releases self-distributed in the US, for example, Warner Home Video distributed the Orion release Every Day on home media and will probably distribute Creed II on home media worldwide next year as well, but if the Disney/Fox merger closes and the Fox/MGM deal ends in 2020, then it's possible that Fox's distribution will shift to other companies other than Universal, most likely WB since they own MGM's actual pre-1986 library and was also previously MGM's overall home entertainment distributor during the 90s. 41.57.217.11 (talk) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC) 41.57.217.11 (talk) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:05, 28 October 2018 edit 41.57.217.11 (talk) →‎Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2018 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:06, 28 October 2018 edit undo 41.57.217.11 (talk) →‎Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2018 Next edit →
Line 78:		Line 78:

	{{edit semi-protected\|MGM Home Entertainment\|answered=no}}		{{edit semi-protected\|MGM Home Entertainment\|answered=no}}
	Just because Disney is buying Fox and Universal Pictures Home Entertainment will distribute Operation Finale and Bond 25 and maybe a couple of other new MGM films on home media doesn't mean that Universal will replace Fox as the overall home entertainment distributor of MGM's library and select new releases. MGM also has other partners that they co-produced some films with like Warner Bros., Sony and Paramount handle physical home entertainment distribution of not only the co-produced films, but also a couple of MGM's 2018 ~~films~~ self-distributed in the US, for example, Warner Home Video distributed the Orion release Every Day on home media and will probably distribute Creed II on home media worldwide next year as well, but if the Disney/Fox merger closes and the Fox/MGM deal ends in 2020, then it's possible that Fox's distribution will shift to other companies other than Universal, most likely WB since they own MGM's actual pre-1986 library and was also previously MGM's overall home entertainment distributor during the 90s. [[Special:Contributions/41.57.217.11\|41.57.217.11]] ([[User talk:41.57.217.11\|talk]]) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/41.57.217.11\|41.57.217.11]] ([[User talk:41.57.217.11\|talk]]) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)		Just because Disney is buying Fox and Universal Pictures Home Entertainment will distribute Operation Finale and Bond 25 and maybe a couple of other new MGM films on home media doesn't mean that Universal will replace Fox as the overall home entertainment distributor of MGM's library and select new releases. MGM also has other partners that they co-produced some films with like Warner Bros., Sony and Paramount handle physical home entertainment distribution of not only the co-produced films, but also a couple of MGM's 2018 film releases self-distributed in the US, for example, Warner Home Video distributed the Orion release Every Day on home media and will probably distribute Creed II on home media worldwide next year as well, but if the Disney/Fox merger closes and the Fox/MGM deal ends in 2020, then it's possible that Fox's distribution will shift to other companies other than Universal, most likely WB since they own MGM's actual pre-1986 library and was also previously MGM's overall home entertainment distributor during the 90s. [[Special:Contributions/41.57.217.11\|41.57.217.11]] ([[User talk:41.57.217.11\|talk]]) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/41.57.217.11\|41.57.217.11]] ([[User talk:41.57.217.11\|talk]]) 03:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)