Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kaihan Krippendorff: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comment and delete
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Comment''' - The statement " Krippendorff is the first contemporary management thinker to have developed a business framework rooted in Eastern philosophy and war tactics" in the [[WP:LEDE|lede paragraph]] is sufficiently extravagant to call the entire draft into doubt. The subject may be notable, but this author isn't likely to write a neutral draft. Therefore:
*'''Comment''' - The statement " Krippendorff is the first contemporary management thinker to have developed a business framework rooted in Eastern philosophy and war tactics" in the [[WP:LEDE|lede paragraph]] is sufficiently extravagant to call the entire draft into doubt. The subject may be notable, but this author isn't likely to write a neutral draft. Therefore:
*'''Delete''' [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 01:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 01:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' I do not have any relationship or financial ties to Krippendorff. I heard him speak at Columbia Business School and read his books. His contribution to management thinking is noteworthy. I worked again to updat the language to remove anything that seems promotional - my apologies as my writing style may have come across as promotional. I am a fairly new wikipedia contributor and would like to contribute this page to the community. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue working on the page until it is fit to add to the wiki lexicon
[[User:Slotmachiner|Slotmachiner]] ([[User talk:Slotmachiner|talk]]) 13:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)slotmachiner

Revision as of 13:23, 5 November 2018

Draft:Kaihan Krippendorff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Declined three times so far at AfC. Deleted twice in mainspace for promotionalism. This still stinks as promotional, but there are lots of refs. I am not inclinded to accept as I don't see subject as notable and promotional language remains after months of declines. Legacypac (talk) 07:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - The statement " Krippendorff is the first contemporary management thinker to have developed a business framework rooted in Eastern philosophy and war tactics" in the lede paragraph is sufficiently extravagant to call the entire draft into doubt. The subject may be notable, but this author isn't likely to write a neutral draft. Therefore:
  • Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I do not have any relationship or financial ties to Krippendorff. I heard him speak at Columbia Business School and read his books. His contribution to management thinking is noteworthy. I worked again to updat the language to remove anything that seems promotional - my apologies as my writing style may have come across as promotional. I am a fairly new wikipedia contributor and would like to contribute this page to the community. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue working on the page until it is fit to add to the wiki lexicon

Slotmachiner (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)slotmachiner[reply]