User talk:Stevendavy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't think Urquhart's objections are vandalism by the Wikipedia definition. What you have done, i.e. to accomodate his objections to your wording and rework it, is exactly what Wikipedia guidelines suggest. If he persists we can take it to arbitration, so keep it reasonable. [[User:Tim Fellows|Tim Fellows]] 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)== |
I don't think Urquhart's objections are vandalism by the Wikipedia definition. What you have done, i.e. to accomodate his objections to your wording and rework it, is exactly what Wikipedia guidelines suggest. If he persists we can take it to arbitration, so keep it reasonable. [[User:Tim Fellows|Tim Fellows]] 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)== |
||
You would do well to note the above. I have not caused trouble on a rugby league site at all, I did correct some rather ambiguous claims that you made and eventually a more accurate (and readable) form was adopted. Your text was the better for it anyway. You might do better to explain to me why on earth a woman from Wisconsin would want to delete the entire entry for a rugby union club in Essex? If a 50-year old sports club with over 500 members in a town of over 80,000 people is considered 'un-notable' then Lord knows what she would make of a rugby league club in Oxford! I notice from her talk page that all she seems to do is delete things. Are these people prevalent on Wikipedia and what can be done about them? [[User:UrquartXV|UrquartXV]] 19:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Scottish teams in RLC== |
==Scottish teams in RLC== |
||
Revision as of 19:15, 14 November 2006
Cavaliers
I don't think Urquhart's objections are vandalism by the Wikipedia definition. What you have done, i.e. to accomodate his objections to your wording and rework it, is exactly what Wikipedia guidelines suggest. If he persists we can take it to arbitration, so keep it reasonable. Tim Fellows 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)==
You would do well to note the above. I have not caused trouble on a rugby league site at all, I did correct some rather ambiguous claims that you made and eventually a more accurate (and readable) form was adopted. Your text was the better for it anyway. You might do better to explain to me why on earth a woman from Wisconsin would want to delete the entire entry for a rugby union club in Essex? If a 50-year old sports club with over 500 members in a town of over 80,000 people is considered 'un-notable' then Lord knows what she would make of a rugby league club in Oxford! I notice from her talk page that all she seems to do is delete things. Are these people prevalent on Wikipedia and what can be done about them? UrquartXV 19:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Scottish teams in RLC
The official statement says that the RLC will be doing the admin and promo work for the Scottish teams this year but they won't be taking part in the RLC this year. It is next year that the Scottish division will join the RLC.GordyB 09:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
[1]. I only really care because the Oxford Cavaliers article contradicts what is in the Rugby League Conference and Rugby league in Scotland articles.GordyB 09:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)