Jump to content

User talk:Yellow Evan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
→‎My goodness: The appropriate response
Line 32: Line 32:
You're still only 19? How young were you when you started? I knew you were young, but didn't realize the degree. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 01:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You're still only 19? How young were you when you started? I knew you were young, but didn't realize the degree. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 01:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Thegreatdr|Yellow Evan}} I was about the same age YE was at that time when I began editing (as an IP). (You may figure out the age in a short while, but I won't say exactly what that was.) Don't be that surprised. I'm sure that plenty of us started out editing as kids. {{smiley|:P}} 🌀 [[User:LightandDark2000|<span style="color:#C69214">'''''Light</span><span style="color:#410064">and</span><span style="color:blue">Dark2000'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:LightandDark2000#top|talk]]) 06:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Thegreatdr|Yellow Evan}} I was about the same age YE was at that time when I began editing (as an IP). (You may figure out the age in a short while, but I won't say exactly what that was.) Don't be that surprised. I'm sure that plenty of us started out editing as kids. {{smiley|:P}} 🌀 [[User:LightandDark2000|<span style="color:#C69214">'''''Light</span><span style="color:#410064">and</span><span style="color:blue">Dark2000'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:LightandDark2000#top|talk]]) 06:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
:: :O [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 00:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


== ''The Signpost'': 24 May 2018 ==
== ''The Signpost'': 24 May 2018 ==

Revision as of 00:30, 17 January 2019

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Template:Education wikibreak

Welcome to Wikipedia. Make it better; do an FA review. (already have?)


WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  • Republic of Texas Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  • India Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  • United States Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  • San Francisco Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  • South Carolina Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My goodness

You're still only 19? How young were you when you started? I knew you were young, but didn't realize the degree. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thegreatdr and Yellow Evan: I was about the same age YE was at that time when I began editing (as an IP). (You may figure out the age in a short while, but I won't say exactly what that was.) Don't be that surprised. I'm sure that plenty of us started out editing as kids. 🌀 LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
:O Thegreatdr (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Re: importance

Surely there should be a top importance article in each basin, and there were two open slots. I think both are more worthy than Sandy or Andrew, considering those two are US based and aren’t even the costliest or even 3rd costliest. Regarding Gafilo, it has more confirmed deaths than Leon-Eline, was stronger, and costlier (only because I couldn’t find a death toll for Leon-Eline). What do you think? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gafilo and Leon-Eline are both important storms. Not sure how much of a factor it is, but Gafilo is not mentioned in the Madagascar country article, whereas Leon-Eline is mentioned in Mozambique's article (although not by name). If you include preceding floods along with Leon-Eline, then the death toll of 700 is one of the highest in the southern hemisphere. Only 114 deaths can be confirmed related to Leon-Eline though, which is lower than Gafilo's death toll. That was my rationale for giving Gafilo top-importance, but I'm happy to open up this discussion more. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

Hey there YE. I believe I addressed all of your concerns with the aforementioned GAN. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

¡Una barnstar para ti!

La Barnstar especial
Debut of barnstar as Professional meteorologist 🌀ARGOSBETA24🌀 01:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Joining WikiProjects

Hello! I want to join the Tropical Cyclone WikiProject, but I don't know how. Grammarguruguy (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Grammarguruguy: just add your username to the bottom of the member list. Then you can place {{User WPTC}} on your user page. :) ~ KN2731 {t · c} 03:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!

It’s a little early your time, but I’m 2 minutes late my time, so happy birthday, my fellow 713er 🎊🎂 Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 04:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey

I think we need to have a discussion on how to improve the Hurricane Harvey article to B class. With what you said "Certain sections are quite bloated and it's missing statements like 'X homes were damaged in Y, leaving Z homeless' type of info.", I marked B2 as not being covered as this would be an obvious omission of data. I am currently working on getting a stub article to start class or possibly C class today, so Harvey isn't my biggest priority. I just feel we need a discussion on how to get our C class hurricane articles to B class. FigfiresSend me a message! 17:48, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on Tropical cyclones in 2010 for the last 2 days and it is coming along nicely. Would appreciate some ideas for improvements to the structure of the page. FigfiresSend me a message! 20:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yellow Evan: I know it is supposed to be different from season articles. I found 24 notable systems that deserve mentioning in the article. However, I would appreciate it if other editors would give guidance in the development of the article. FigfiresSend me a message! 00:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yellow Evan:Should the summary for the notable tropical cyclones be a sentence or two? Or should it be more detailed? I just want more feedback before going ahead with some changes. FigfiresSend me a message! 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WPac tables

Just to note that in regards to your edit here, you are wrong as we use the JMA numbers instead of the JTWC numbers. Therefore Maria is "08" here not "10". Typhoon2013 (talk) 01:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello YE, if you have time do you mind looking through my draft? I'm mostly done with it but I'd like other users (especially people familiar with the EPac) to make sure it's generally sound first before entering mainspace. ~ KN2731 {t · c} 15:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Hector Record

Appears that Hector just set a record. I cant find any sources about the record... Are we still able to mention it? FigfiresSend me a message! 22:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Also, what do you think about the current Hector article? I have been working hard to expand the meteorological history section. FigfiresSend me a message! 19:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Re: To be honest, I highly doubt Hector will cross into the Western Pacific at Typhoon intensity given it was just lowered to 65kt. Does the JMA name it based off its highest intensity or the intensity at the time it enters the basin? FigfiresSend me a message! 21:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant was if it crosses over as a TS, will it be referred to as Typhoon Hector or (Severe) Tropical Storm Hector for the name of it in that region?FigfiresSend me a message! 21:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hurricane Hector (2018) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Hector (2018) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Hector (2018) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FigfiresSend me a message! 17:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, the closing </font> is misplaced, belonging outside the wikilink. Also, the font color markup has no effect, because the only thing inside it are two wikilinks, and wikilinks override font colors set outside the wikilink.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <font color="#66666"><sup>[[2017 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup></font>]] : YE Pacific Hurricane

to

[[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <sup>[[2017 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup>]] : YE Pacific Hurricane

Anomalocaris (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
  • Hel, Poland Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
  • Scotland Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
  • Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis, Republic of Texas Iazyges, Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack and United States Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

Lexis Nexis requests

Hey YE, could you check LN for Cyclone Sagar, Cyclone Mekunu, and Cyclone Luban? I want to get all three up to GAN by the end of the year, and a nice LN search would make me feel better about comprehensiveness. Hope you're well. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

School is more important than newspaper requests :P Thanks YE ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is South Carolina Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1. South Carolina Courcelles (submissions)
  2. Wales Kosack (submissions)
  3. Hel, Poland Kees08 (submissions)
  4. SounderBruce (submissions)
  5. Scotland Cas Liber (submissions)
  6. Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7. Republic of Texas Iazyges (submissions)
  8. United States Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

User page

YE, did you visit Texas twice? Because I see 2 “this user has visited Texas”. Acyclonxe (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yellow Evan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

There are no records of any storms hitting some Molly out before 1980, and it doesn’t help that the satellite era started in 1961. Frankly, I bet the Indian meteorological department didn’t care for much of its history tracking storms that far west away from India. I’m sure there been more storms affecting the area. I just can’t find them :/ Could you search LN for any of the storms since 1984, or so [Somalia cyclone] as a search. You’ll get a lot for 2013 and 2018, so just search before 2013 (if you can/have the time!) Just wanted to explain why I published despite it seeming incomplete. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]