Jump to content

Talk:Team Fortress 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Chilors (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Chilors (talk | contribs)
Expansion for Reception: Rephrase.
Line 70: Line 70:
== Expansion for Reception ==
== Expansion for Reception ==
The template which says that the section about the game's reception needs expansion is over two and a half years old. One of the two comments below the section says "''Expand on reception for later updates, namely the April 2008 update''", however the April 2008 (Gold Rush) update is mentioned, as that's when the unlockable weapons for the Medic class were added. Other classes getting unlockable weapons is not relevant according to the other comment, so is there anything else the section needs, or is the template outdated? --[[User:Chilors|Chilors]] ([[User talk:Chilors|talk]]) 19:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The template which says that the section about the game's reception needs expansion is over two and a half years old. One of the two comments below the section says "''Expand on reception for later updates, namely the April 2008 update''", however the April 2008 (Gold Rush) update is mentioned, as that's when the unlockable weapons for the Medic class were added. Other classes getting unlockable weapons is not relevant according to the other comment, so is there anything else the section needs, or is the template outdated? --[[User:Chilors|Chilors]] ([[User talk:Chilors|talk]]) 19:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
:Let me rephrase: I don't think we still need the expansion template as the suggestions in the comments have been implemented. The April 2008 update is mentioned and there are no mentions of other classes getting unlockable weapons. --[[User:Chilors|Chilors]] ([[User talk:Chilors|talk]]) 21:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:52, 19 August 2019

Template:Vital article

Former good articleTeam Fortress 2 was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 30, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
October 27, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
August 20, 2015Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Regarding need for citations

I see the section for game modes is listed as needing more citations and some sentences are tagged as citation needed. I am unfamiliar with the protocol for citing game mechanics. These are just things in the game one can see by playing, and the game does not have a detailed website that explains the mechanics. As someone who plays, I can vouch for the accuracy of the information (at least, the sentences I skimmed with the citation needed tag were accurate). As far as I know, there aren't any kind of writings to cite for these game mechanics. Do they really need to be cited? I would suggest in good faith that we remove the template for needed citations in the Game Modes section. Also, I would request an edit in the competitive play section to clarify that competitive leagues (like ESEA) are third parties not related to the game's developers (in contrast to the developer's dedicated matchmaking). BishopsHouseofHorrors (talk) 01:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2018

Change "were" to "where" Zuckinson (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I think I found it and I made this fix, but next time please be more specific about where the error is. Thanks! RudolfRed (talk) 04:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2018

In the part of the page where it describes the Pyro, it says they are a mentally unstable pyromaniac. They likely aren't, because if you read their mask, it says optical mask, implying that it changes what they see. This is called Pyroland in game. 2600:6C46:7C00:1BB2:7CA5:7591:FC35:3341 (talk) 01:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- ferret (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Pyrovision_Goggles, and the item's description. Also, as previously noted, "optical mask". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.41.102.117 (talkcontribs)

Wikis are not reliable sources, see WP:USERG. -- ferret (talk) 01:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is an official Wiki for the game, and the game even links the wiki in the Mann Co. store. Optical mask. I will not try to get this added to the page after this last attempt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6c46:7c00:3c2b:6c2d:47b7:a41f:95b7 (talkcontribs)

Edit Request

I request having a link to the official Team Fortress wiki at the top of the page telling users to click it for more in-depth details about Mechanics, Maps, etc https://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Main_Page The Kickster (talk) 20:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We do not promote external wikis like this. --Masem (t) 22:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
However this is the official Valve-supported wiki. Should we make an exception in this case? YuriNikolai (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's still a user-made wiki, even if Valve is hosting it. At best, we could discuss including it as an External link (but the current official page links to it, so I don't see an immediate need). It certainly cannot be placed as suggested. --Masem (t) 23:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion for Reception

The template which says that the section about the game's reception needs expansion is over two and a half years old. One of the two comments below the section says "Expand on reception for later updates, namely the April 2008 update", however the April 2008 (Gold Rush) update is mentioned, as that's when the unlockable weapons for the Medic class were added. Other classes getting unlockable weapons is not relevant according to the other comment, so is there anything else the section needs, or is the template outdated? --Chilors (talk) 19:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let me rephrase: I don't think we still need the expansion template as the suggestions in the comments have been implemented. The April 2008 update is mentioned and there are no mentions of other classes getting unlockable weapons. --Chilors (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]