Lolita (1997 film): Difference between revisions
WP:UGC Audience scores not allowed, not reliable. |
|||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
==Reception== |
==Reception== |
||
[[Rotten Tomatoes]] gave the film |
[[Rotten Tomatoes]] gave the film an approval rating of 68% based on 25 reviews.<ref name = "rottentomatoes">{{cite web | url = https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1084881_lolita | title = Lolita (1997) | website = [[Rotten Tomatoes]] | accessdate = 2017-08-24 }}</ref> [[Metacritic]] reports an average score of 46 out of 100 based on 17 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/lolita | title = Lolita | website = [[Metacritic]] | accessdate = 2016-02-02 }}</ref> |
||
[[James Berardinelli]] praised the performances of the two leads, Irons and Swain, but he considered Griffith's performance weak, "stiff and unconvincing"; he considered the film better when she no longer appeared in it and concluded: "''Lolita'' is not a sex film; it's about characters, relationships, and the consequences of imprudent actions. And those who seek to brand the picture as immoral have missed the point. Both Humbert and Lolita are eventually destroyed—what could be more moral? The only real controversy I can see surrounding this film is why there was ever a controversy in the first place."<ref>{{cite news | title = Lolita (1997): A Film Review by James Berardinelli | first = James | last = Berardinelli | url = http://preview.reelviews.net/movies/l/lolita.html | work = ReelViews | date = 1999-01-29 | accessdate = 2010-07-16 }}</ref> |
[[James Berardinelli]] praised the performances of the two leads, Irons and Swain, but he considered Griffith's performance weak, "stiff and unconvincing"; he considered the film better when she no longer appeared in it and concluded: "''Lolita'' is not a sex film; it's about characters, relationships, and the consequences of imprudent actions. And those who seek to brand the picture as immoral have missed the point. Both Humbert and Lolita are eventually destroyed—what could be more moral? The only real controversy I can see surrounding this film is why there was ever a controversy in the first place."<ref>{{cite news | title = Lolita (1997): A Film Review by James Berardinelli | first = James | last = Berardinelli | url = http://preview.reelviews.net/movies/l/lolita.html | work = ReelViews | date = 1999-01-29 | accessdate = 2010-07-16 }}</ref> |
Revision as of 03:24, 24 August 2019
Lolita | |
---|---|
![]() Theatrical release poster | |
Directed by | Adrian Lyne |
Screenplay by | Stephen Schiff |
Produced by | |
Starring | |
Cinematography | Howard Atherton |
Edited by | |
Music by | Ennio Morricone |
Production company | |
Distributed by | The Samuel Goldwyn Company |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 137 minutes[1] |
Countries |
|
Language | English |
Budget | $62 million[2] |
Box office | $1.1 million (US)[3] |
Lolita is a 1997 American-French drama film directed by Adrian Lyne and written by Stephen Schiff. It is the second screen adaptation of Vladimir Nabokov's novel of the same name and stars Jeremy Irons as Humbert Humbert and Dominique Swain as Dolores "Lolita" Haze, with supporting roles by Melanie Griffith as Charlotte Haze, and Frank Langella as Clare Quilty. The film is about a middle-aged male professor, Humbert, who rents a room in the house of the widow Charlotte Haze and becomes sexually attracted to her adolescent daughter Dolores, also called "Lo" or "Lolita".
Lyne's film is more overt with many of the novel's darker elements compared to Stanley Kubrick's 1962 version, which utilised suggestion and innuendo for comic purposes (and was scripted by Nabokov himself).
The film had difficulty finding an American distributor[4] and premiered in Europe before being released in America. The film was eventually picked up in the United States by Showtime, a cable network, before finally being released theatrically by The Samuel Goldwyn Company.[5] The performances by Irons and Swain impressed audiences, but, although praised by some critics for its faithfulness to Nabokov's narrative, the film received a mixed critical reception in the United States. Lolita was met with much controversy in Australia, where it was not given a theatrical release until April 1999.[citation needed]
Plot
In 1947, Humbert Humbert (Jeremy Irons), a middle-aged European professor of French literature, travels to the United States to take a teaching position in New Hampshire. He rents a room in the home of widow Charlotte Haze (Melanie Griffith), largely because he is romantically attracted to her adolescent daughter Dolores (Dominique Swain), also called "Lo", who he sees while touring the house. Obsessed from boyhood with girls of approximately her age (whom he calls "nymphets"), Humbert is immediately smitten with Lo and gets married to Charlotte only just to be near her daughter.
Charlotte finds Humbert's secret diary and discovers his preference for her daughter. Furious, Charlotte runs out of the house, when she is struck by a car and killed. Her death frees Humbert to pursue a romantic and sexual relationship with Lo, whom he nicknames "Lolita". Humbert and Lo then travel the country, staying in various motels before eventually settling in the college town of Beardsley, where Humbert takes a teaching job and Lo begins attending an all-girls Catholic school. However, Lo's increasing boredom with Humbert, combined with her growing desire for independence, fuels a constant tension that lead to a fight between them. Humbert's affection for Lo is also rivaled by another man, playwright Clare Quilty (Frank Langella), who has been pursuing Lo since the beginning of the pair's travels. Lo eventually escapes with Quilty, and Humbert's search for them is unsuccessful, especially as he doesn't know Quilty's name.
Three years later, Humbert receives a letter from Lo asking for money. Humbert visits Lo, who is now married and pregnant. Humbert asks her to run away with him, but she refuses. He relents and gives her a substantial amount of money. Lo also reveals to Humbert how Quilty actually tracked young girls and took them to Pavor Manor, his home in Parkington, to exploit them for child pornography. Quilty abandoned her after she refused to be in one of his films.
After his visit with Lo, Humbert tracks down Quilty and murders him. After being chased by the police, Humbert is arrested and sent to prison. He dies in November 1950, and Lo dies the next month on Christmas Day from childbirth complications.
Cast
- Jeremy Irons as Professor Humbert Humbert
- Ben Silverstone as young Humbert
- Dominique Swain as Dolores "Lolita" Haze
- Frank Langella as Clare Quilty
- Melanie Griffith as Charlotte Haze
- Suzanne Shepherd as Miss Pratt
- Keith Reddin as Reverend Rigger
- Erin J. Dean as Mona
- Joan Glover as Miss LaBone
- Ed Grady as Dr. Melinik
- Michael Goodwin as Mr. Beale
- Angela Paton as Mrs. Holmes
- Emma Griffiths-Malin as Annabel Lee
- Ronald Pickup as young Humbert's father
- Michael Culkin as Mr. Leigh
- Annabelle Apsion as Mrs. Leigh
Production
The first screen adaptation of the book, 1962's Lolita, was credited solely to Nabokov although it was heavily revised by Stanley Kubrick and James Harris, and directed by Stanley Kubrick.
The screenplay for the 1997 version, more faithful to the text of the novel than the earlier motion picture, is credited to Stephen Schiff, a writer for The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and other magazines. Schiff was hired to write it as his first movie script, after the film's producers had rejected commissioned screenplays from the more experienced screenwriters and directors James Dearden (Fatal Attraction), Harold Pinter, and David Mamet.[6][7][8] According to Schiff:
Right from the beginning, it was clear to all of us that this movie was not a "remake" of Kubrick's film. Rather, we were out to make a new adaptation of a very great novel. Some of the filmmakers involved actually looked upon the Kubrick version as a kind of "what not to do." I had somewhat fonder memories of it than that, but I had not seen it for maybe fifteen years, and I didn't allow myself to go back to it again.[9]
Schiff added that Kubrick's film might better have been titled Quilty, since the director had allowed the character of Quilty to "take over the movie".[10]
Lyne states in the DVD commentary that he prefers location shooting even though it is more difficult in some respects; and that the home of Charlotte Haze was filmed in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Release
Due to the difficulty in securing a distributor, Lolita had a very limited theatrical run in order to qualify for awards.[4] Accordingly, the film only took in a gross income of $19,492 in its opening weekend. Since the final domestic gross income was $1,147,784[3] on an estimated $62 million budget, the film was considered a flop at the box office.[2]
Reception
Rotten Tomatoes gave the film an approval rating of 68% based on 25 reviews.[11] Metacritic reports an average score of 46 out of 100 based on 17 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[12]
James Berardinelli praised the performances of the two leads, Irons and Swain, but he considered Griffith's performance weak, "stiff and unconvincing"; he considered the film better when she no longer appeared in it and concluded: "Lolita is not a sex film; it's about characters, relationships, and the consequences of imprudent actions. And those who seek to brand the picture as immoral have missed the point. Both Humbert and Lolita are eventually destroyed—what could be more moral? The only real controversy I can see surrounding this film is why there was ever a controversy in the first place."[13]
The film was The New York Times "Critics Pick" on July 31, 1998, with its critic Caryn James saying, "Rich beyond what anyone could have expected, the film repays repeated viewings...it turns Humbert's madness into art."[14] Writer/director James Toback lists it in his picks for the 10 finest films ever made, but he rates the original film higher.[15]
Commenting on differences between the novel and the film, Charles Taylor, in Salon, observes that "[f]or all of their vaunted (and, it turns out, false) fidelity to Nabokov, Lyne and Schiff have made a pretty, gauzy Lolita that replaces the book's cruelty and comedy with manufactured lyricism and mopey romanticism".[16] Extending Taylor's observation, Keith Phipps concludes: "Lyne doesn't seem to get the novel, failing to incorporate any of Nabokov's black comedy—which is to say, Lolita's heart and soul."[17]
Soundtrack
The film's soundtrack was composed by Ennio Morricone and released on the Music Box Records label.[18] As the composer himself described the project: "With my music, I only had to follow on a high level the director's intentions to make Lolita a story of sincere and reciprocal love, even within the limits of the purity and malicious naiveté of its young subject."[19]
All music is composed by Ennio Morricone[19]
No. | Title | Music | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Lolita" (contains unreleased material) | Ennio Morricone | 4:15 |
2. | "Love in the Morning" | Ennio Morricone | 3:37 |
3. | "Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:26 |
4. | "Take Me to Bed" | Ennio Morricone | 2:51 |
5. | "Togetherness / Lolita" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:58 |
6. | "Requiescant" | Ennio Morricone | 2:10 |
7. | "Lolita On Humbert's Lap" | Ennio Morricone | 3:34 |
8. | "She had nowhere else to go" | Ennio Morricone | 3:19 |
9. | "What About Me" | Ennio Morricone | 1:41 |
10. | "Lolita" (contains unreleased material) | Ennio Morricone | 1:21 |
11. | "She had nowhere else to go" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:56 |
12. | "Togetherness" | Ennio Morricone | 2:32 |
13. | "Lolita" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:11 |
14. | "Quilty" | Ennio Morricone | 4:14 |
15. | "Love in the Morning" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:01 |
16. | "She had nowhere else to go" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:58 |
17. | "Togetherness / Lolita" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 3:03 |
18. | "Requiescant (alternate)" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:53 |
19. | "Lolita In My Arms" | Ennio Morricone | 1:37 |
20. | "She had nowhere else to go" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:39 |
21. | "What About Me" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:52 |
22. | "Love in the Morning" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:36 |
23. | "Humbert's Diary" | Ennio Morricone | 2:57 |
24. | "Lolita" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:15 |
25. | "Togetherness" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 2:28 |
26. | "She had nowhere else to go" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 3:42 |
27. | "Humbert on the Hillside" | Ennio Morricone | 1:42 |
28. | "Lolita" (previously unreleased) | Ennio Morricone | 1:30 |
29. | "Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury" | Ennio Morricone | 2:20 |
30. | "Lolita (finale)" | Ennio Morricone | 4:07 |
Total length: | 77:03 |
See also
References
- ^ "LOLITA (18)". British Board of Film Classification. March 18, 1998. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
- ^ a b "Lolita (1998)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved August 15, 2011.
- ^ a b "Movie Lolita – Box Office Data". The Numbers. Retrieved August 15, 2011.
- ^ a b James, Caryn (July 31, 1998). "'Lolita': Revisiting a Dangerous Obsession". The New York Times. Retrieved March 28, 2010.
- ^ Black, Joel (2002). The Reality Effect: Film culture and the graphic imperative. New York: Routledge. p. 262. ISBN 0-415-93721-3.
- ^ According to Gale, in Sharp Cut, Pinter was paid for his work but he asked to have his name removed from the credits, as permitted by his contract.: "In November 1994 Pinter wrote that 'I've just heard that they are bringing another writer into the Lolita film. It doesn't surprise me.' Pinter's contract contained a clause to the effect that the film company could bring in another writer, but that in such a case he could withdraw his name (this was also the case with [the film] The Remains of the Day—he had insisted on this clause since the experience with revisions made to his Handmaid's Tale script" (352).
- ^ Hudgins observes: "During our 1994 interview, Pinter told [Steven H.] Gale and me that he had learned his lesson after the revisions imposed on his script for The Handmaid's Tale, which he has decided not to publish. When his script for Remains of the Day was radically revised by the James Ivory–Ismail Merchant partnership, he refused to allow his name to be listed in the credits"; Hudgins adds: "We did not see Pinter's name up in lights when Lyne's Lolita finally made its appearance in 1998. Pinter goes on in the March 13 [1995] letter [to Hudgins] to state that 'I have never been given any reason at all as to why the film company brought in another writer,' again quite similar to the equally ungracious treatment that he received in the Remains of the Day situation. He concludes that though he never met Nabokov, 'indeed I knew "Lolita" very well and loved it.' " (125). Hudgins also observes that Schiff was brought in after the efforts by Dearden (October 21, 1991), Pinter (September 26, 1994), and Mamet (March 10, 1995) and that Schiff "has no previous scripts to his credit" (124).
- ^ In his 2008 essay published in The Pinter Review, Hudgins discusses further details about why "Pinter elected not to publish three of his completed filmscripts, The Handmaid's Tale, The Remains of the Day, and Lolita," all of which Hudgins considers "masterful filmscripts" of "demonstrable superiority to the shooting scripts that were eventually used to make the films"; fortunately ("We can thank our various lucky stars"), he says, "these Pinter filmscripts are now available not only in private collections but also in the Pinter Archive at the British Library"; in this essay, which he first presented as a paper at the 10th Europe Theatre Prize symposium, Pinter: Passion, Poetry, Politics, held in Turin, Italy, in March 2006, Hudgins "examin[es] all three unpublished filmscripts in conjunction with one another" and "provides several interesting insights about Pinter's adaptation process" (132).
- ^ "An Interview with Stephen Schiff" by Suellen Stringer-Hye, Penn State University Libraries, 1996
- ^ Schiff : "Kubrick...made a film that might better have been titled Quilty. Very much in the thrall of Peter Sellers, he allowed Quilty to take over the movie, with Sellers improvising vast swatches of dialogue. If you look at the Kubrick movie today, the Sellers stuff still seems amazingly energetic and funny and alive; the rest of the story plods by comparison. The other strange choice in the Kubrick film, of course, is Sue Lyon, who, even though she was only fifteen when she played Lolita--the same age as our Dominique Swain--could easily have passed for a twenty-year-old porno star. Dominique can easily pass for a twelve-year-old, which we all think is a very good thing." From the Schiff interview by Suellen Stringer-Hye, 1996
- ^ "Lolita (1997)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved August 24, 2017.
- ^ "Lolita". Metacritic. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
- ^ Berardinelli, James (January 29, 1999). "Lolita (1997): A Film Review by James Berardinelli". ReelViews. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
- ^ "Television Review: Revisiting a Dangerous Obsession". The New York Times. July 31, 1998. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- ^ Toback, James (2002). "How the Directors and Critics Voted". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 6, 2008. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Taylor, Charles (May 29, 1998). "Recent Movies: Home Movies: Nymphet Mania". Salon. Retrieved May 27, 2012.
- ^ Phipps, Keith (March 29, 2002). "Lolita". The A.V. Club. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- ^ Lolita soundtrack Archived November 15, 2013, at archive.today, Music Box Records website
- ^ a b "LOLITA (REISSUE)". Music Box Records. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
- Works cited
- Gale, Steven H. Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process. Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky, 2003. ISBN 978-0-8131-2244-1. Print.
- Gale, Steven H. (ed.). The Films of Harold Pinter. Albany: SUNY P, 2001. ISBN 0-7914-4932-7. ISBN 978-0-7914-4932-5. Print.
- Hudgins, Christopher C. "Harold Pinter's Lolita: 'My Sin, My Soul'." 123–46 in Gale, The Films of Harold Pinter.
- Hudgins, Christopher C. "Three Unpublished Harold Pinter Filmscripts: The Handmaid's Tale, The Remains of the Day, Lolita". The Pinter Review: Nobel Prize / Europe Theatre Prize Volume: 2005–2008. Ed. Francis Gillen with Steven H. Gale. Tampa: U of Tampa P, 2008. 132–39. ISBN 978-1-879852-19-8 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-879852-20-4 (softcover). ISSN 0895-9706. Print.
- James, Caryn (July 31, 1998). "Television Review: Revisiting a Dangerous Obsession". The New York Times. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- Phipps, Keith (March 29, 2002). "Lolita". The A.V. Club. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- Taylor, Charles (May 29, 1998). "Recent Movies: Home Movies: Nymphet". Salon. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- Toback, James (2002). "How the Directors and Critics Voted: US: Top Ten". Sight & Sound. 2009-03-25. Archived from the original on December 6, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
External links
- 1997 films
- American films
- French films
- English-language films
- 1990s drama films
- 1990s independent films
- 1990s road movies
- American drama films
- American independent films
- American road movies
- French drama films
- French independent films
- Films scored by Ennio Morricone
- Films about child sexual abuse
- Films about educators
- Films about hebephilia
- Films about murderers
- Films based on American novels
- Films based on works by Vladimir Nabokov
- Films directed by Adrian Lyne
- Films set in the 1920s
- Films set in the 1930s
- Films set in the 1940s
- Films set in the 1950s
- Films set in New Hampshire
- Films shot in California
- Films shot in El Paso, Texas
- Films shot in France
- Films shot in New Mexico
- Films shot in New Orleans
- Films shot in North Carolina
- Films shot in San Antonio
- Films shot in South Carolina
- Films shot in Texas
- Juvenile sexuality in films
- American neo-noir films
- The Samuel Goldwyn Company films
- Sexuality and age in fiction
- Erotic drama films