Talk:European Green Deal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 14 May 2020

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Climate change Stub‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

European Union Stub‑class High‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Unassessed

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Since the article covers an important topic but is classified as a stub, it should be expanded. I propose changing the 'Overview' section to an 'Aims' section that discusses in more detail the goals of the European Green Deal and the timeline within which changes are to be put in place. Furthermore, the fact that Poland has an opt-out clause should be expanded on - this could be done in a new section titled 'Controversies'. In the introduction, a few sentences on the history of the deal in comparison with other similar agreements would help with contextualization. The existing text does not need many edits in my opinion, but there is ample room for expansion in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polscidam20 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green Recovery

In the German WP we now have an article Green Recovery. -- 2001:4DD4:23CF:0:C87F:6DDB:33BB:FDBD (talk) 12:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I do think that expanding the article is necessary. The goals and the policies should be your priority and thus should be extensively cited (perhaps look for graphs, images). What could be interesting is the timeline negotiations of these goals and policies. Furthermore, you are talking about Poland and the controversy around, although is it the only country? Could you not make a list of governments that already agreed to the plan/ ratified it and see if they stick to it? As of the last point for me, I think that with the historical facts you want to add in the introduction, a small edit on who 'creates' the deal? which politicians or groups or NGO brought the deal up to the EU parliament? Otherwise, I do think that you are doing a great job. SPMChapel (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)spmchapel[reply]

SPMChapel, If you have reliable sources for any of that information, that would be great. I found it difficult to expand because I couldn't find enough sources. Femke Nijsse (talk) 10:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review (CP)

Poliscidam20, I agree with your plans to expand this article as it is clearly a “stub” with room for improvement. Giving overall aims of the European Green Deal can be use especially because it aids the overall fluency of the article and gives the outline of the main points. Your plan for this expansion seems feasible and I have confidence that it can be done in a scholarly manner - this will definitely benefit the overall quality of this wikipedia article.

Peer Review CP

You are right in saying that this article needs to be expanded. Your idea about the section explaining the main goals of the European green Deal seems to be of high relevance to help the reader understand why this deal is of such importance. However, make sure to use proper referencing when adding this section to the article. Moreover, adding some historical background of the deal in the introduction would indeed help the conceptualization but maybe you could extend this conceptualization to an entire section that would explain how the deal was created and voted by the members and also give some insight about the most important actors of it. Good luck! Halton0310fields (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

peer review

I think your goals for this page make sense and are realizable. Perhaps the article could benefit from some historical background. Regarding the "controversy" section, I would make a corresponding one which includes the countries that agree with the deal/abide by it. I understand that it is implied that all EU member states except Poland do but to an uniformed person stumbling upon this article, it may not be clear. Otherwise, good luck! I think the page will benefit from these edits, as it is a highly relevant subject. Gabz11 (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 I do think that expanding the article is necessary. The goals and the policies should be your priority and thus should be extensively cited (perhaps look for graphs, images). What could be interesting is the timeline negotiations of these goals and policies. Furthermore, you are talking about Poland and the controversy around, although is it the only country? Could you not make a list of governments that already agreed to the plan/ ratified it and see if they stick to it? As of the last point for me, I think that with the historical facts you want to add in the introduction, a small edit on who 'creates' the deal? which politicians or groups or NGO brought the deal up to the EU parliament? Otherwise, I do think that you are doing a great job. [[User:SPMChapel|SPMChapel]] ([[User talk:SPMChapel|talk]]) 08:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)spmchapel
 :{{u|SPMChapel}}, If you have reliable sources for any of that information, that would be great. I found it difficult to expand because I couldn't find enough sources. [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 10:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
+==Peer Review (CP)==
+Poliscidam20, I agree with your plans to expand this article as it is clearly a “stub” with room for improvement. Giving overall aims of the European Green Deal can be use especially because it aids the overall fluency of the article and gives the outline of the main points. Your plan for this expansion seems feasible and I have confidence that it can be done in a scholarly manner - this will definitely benefit the overall quality of this wikipedia article.
 == Peer Review CP ==