Talk:City of Melbourne: Difference between revisions
→Brief semi-protection: reply, add section |
|||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
:When you have explained the requested changes you could post on [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board]] to get more attention. [[User:TSventon|TSventon]] ([[User talk:TSventon|talk]]) 14:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC) |
:When you have explained the requested changes you could post on [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board]] to get more attention. [[User:TSventon|TSventon]] ([[User talk:TSventon|talk]]) 14:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
Sorry, I'm confused. I've put the changes above. The current section is out of date. The party affiliations need to be removed as they are no longer correct. All of this information is available on the City of Melbourne website, which is also listed above. I'm not sure what I need to do next, apologies. |
Revision as of 06:25, 17 August 2020
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Australia: Melbourne Start‑class Low‑importance ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Population?
The introduction states that the 2001 census has the population of the Melbourne CC at 46,000, yet the info box on the right has it for the 2001 census at 60,745. Which is correct?Mdgr 03:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is the set of information from ABS that should be used. It shows a total count of 67,784, minus 7,039 overseas visitors. That makes an official population of 60,745. So, the infobox is correct. JohnnoShadbolt 03:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Lists
Why do the lists (for example the school lists) include institutions not in the city of Melbourne...am I missing something about this?
Local government history
Could somebody from Oz put something in the History section to explain how and why the local elected officials were twice replaced for a while by appointed commissioners? The city's own page [1] is damned coy about how and why the State did this. --Orange Mike 19:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Logo
The logo was recently replaced on this page to the black and white version, seen here. If you take a look at the website, as well as many other sources, the current logo is the coloured, cyan version, as seen to the right. If an SVG version is wanted, the black and white one should at least be coloured correctly. Cheers, Chicken-7 talk 21:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Same happened to City of Monash too recently. I was going to suggest anyone with Inkscape could fix it, but it looks rather complex - really the person who did the original upload should have done this if they intended to replace the logo. Orderinchaos 21:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Map
The map of Melbourne is here http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutMelbourne/CityMaps/Documents/City_of_Melbourne_suburb_and_postcode_boundary_map.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Requested moves of 30+ Melbourne street names
Editors here may be interested in this multiple RM that I have initiated. My preamble:
These articles are all concerned with street names in Melbourne. (I would have include another 17, but the template has a limit of 30.) I do not support these moves; but I know that some very active editors do. It is time to air the matter, once and for all. Is it better to have an article on Collins Street in Melbourne called simply Collins Street, or to have it called Collins Street, Melbourne as at present? Which option serves the needs of Wikipedia's worldwide readership better? In almost all cases that I list there is no content in the destination article, just a redirect. And in almost all cases there is no Wikipedia article that very closely resembles the Melbourne-oriented one. There are, for example, no other Collins Streets with their own articles.
Your vote ("Support" or "Oppose") would be welcome, along with your reasons.
NoeticaTea? 12:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Brief semi-protection
Article is briefly restricted to autoconfirmed editors to pause a series of edits from a WP:COI account. Apologies for the inconvenience, the protection will expire in due course or can be lifted if the cityofmelbcomms team start following the instructions at WP:PSCOI and come here to discuss their proposed changes rather than making them directly in the article.
In the mean time if there's other edits anyone would like to make and can't, please let me know via the edit request function, or by posting here or on my talk page. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your help. I'm really sorry for the confusion. My name is Emma and I am not experienced at using Wikipedia at all so have clearly made some mistakes. Apologies. It wasn't intentional and just a reflection of my lack of experience. I have made an error trying to update the City of Melbourne wiki page. It is currently out of date and has a list of Councillors that are no longer elected and additional information that is no longer required. The information I have tried to update it with is correct and reflected on the City of Melbourne website. There is an election in October and it is important for the City of Melbourne page to be up to date as people begin looking at our details before voting. I didn't realize why my changes were originally rejected, I thought it was just because my email address was incorrect so I tried from a personal account. Sorry about that. Can you please let me know what my next steps are to try and update the page? Thanks for your help. And again - I'm sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.235.14 (talk) 02:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. :)
- Basically, all you have to do is what you've done above. As someone with an association with the council it's best you don't edit the article directly, but you're free to propose changes here, as you've done, and if there's a general consensus in favour of them they can get added. For anyone else reading this the proposed edit is here.
- Hopefully your post will attract some comments shortly and the edit can be made, partly made or not made depending on that discussion. If no one comes by to comment you might think about posting a brief note to somewhere like the Australian Wikipedias Noticeboard to let people know there's something to comment on, but up to you.
- Note also that I'm just the janitor, and don't have a view on the content of the edit itself. In that exciting janitorial role, I'll lift the page protection to let other editing continue. Good luck with it! -- Euryalus (talk) 02:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks so much for taking the time to explain. That all makes complete sense. I appreciate it.
I'll wait to see if comments are left here and then go from there.
Just to make sure I'm understanding correctly, would you then make the update? Or is it done by someone else?
Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.235.14 (talk) 06:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, if no one else does. If there's consensus for it, it can be added by anyone. :) -- Euryalus (talk) 06:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi User:203.26.235.14 (Emma), have you read (or at least skimmed through) the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide linked by Euryalus? The advice section says that editors with a conflict of interest (COI) should use a registered account and how they can disclose their COI/ paid editor status. When you request an edit on a talk page you need to state clearly what you want added or removed and give sources. Adding {{request edit}} to the request adds it to the list of edit requests needing attention. Removing referenced content may be controversial, but updating the list of councillors should be fine. If you need any help you are welcome to ask at Wikipedia:Teahouse, which will probably respond more quickly than Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. TSventon (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- The incredibly badly named "Plain and simple conflict of interest guide" runs to over 6,3000 words; with such volume it is not fit for the purpose of introducing new people to Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing:, for future reference, can you recommend a better introduction for people new to Wikipedia? TSventon (talk) 20:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- The incredibly badly named "Plain and simple conflict of interest guide" runs to over 6,3000 words; with such volume it is not fit for the purpose of introducing new people to Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi User:203.26.235.14 (Emma), have you read (or at least skimmed through) the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide linked by Euryalus? The advice section says that editors with a conflict of interest (COI) should use a registered account and how they can disclose their COI/ paid editor status. When you request an edit on a talk page you need to state clearly what you want added or removed and give sources. Adding {{request edit}} to the request adds it to the list of edit requests needing attention. Removing referenced content may be controversial, but updating the list of councillors should be fine. If you need any help you are welcome to ask at Wikipedia:Teahouse, which will probably respond more quickly than Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. TSventon (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, if no one else does. If there's consensus for it, it can be added by anyone. :) -- Euryalus (talk) 06:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Edit request 30 July 2020
Hi, thanks for your help. I have read the conflict of interest guide. I have now registered an account. Declaration of COI: I’m an employee of City of Melbourne and the information on the Wiki page is out of date and incorrect. Updates will be factual only and in line with City of Melbourne website. The update is to the section titled 'Composition of current Council'. It is to add in the date of the upcoming election and update the list of Councillors. The list is out of date and includes the names of people no longer elected to government. These changes are on our official website at https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/Pages/home.aspx
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at City of Melbourne. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
I would like to replace the current text under 'Composition of current Council' with:
The City of Melbourne is an unsubdivided municipality consisting of a directly elected Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor, and nine councillors. Since 2008, all Victorian councillors serve a four year term. The next general election will be held on Saturday 24 October 2020.
During a general election, the City of Melbourne holds two simultaneous elections – one to elect the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor (leadership team) and the other to elect the nine councillors. All residents are entitled to vote in the election, as well as up to two of each of the following: non-residential owners and occupiers of rateable property. If a corporation solely owns or occupies rateable property in the municipality, then the corporation must appoint two company officers (director and/or company secretary, or equivalent) to represent it and vote on its behalf.
Further information can be found at the following link https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/about-council/governance-transparency/elections/Pages/about-council-elections.aspx
The current makeup of the Council is:
Sally Capp - Lord Mayor Arron Wood - Deputy Mayor Nicolas Frances Gilley Philip Le Liu Rohan Leppert Kevin Louey Cathy Oke Beverley Pinder-Mortimer Nicholas Reece Susan Riley Jackie Watts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmuldoon (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Emmuldoon, please can you sign posts on talk pages with four tildes at the end of your post like this ~~~~. I have removed and readded the {{request edit}} tag as the edit adding the tag needs to be signed to add it to the list of edit requests. TSventon (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
hi thank you, will do. sorry, im learning to use wiki. is it okay for me to make these corrections to the city of Melbourne page now? thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmuldoon (talk • contribs) 05:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Emmuldoon, I have updated the councillors (and party affiliations) as I think that is uncontroversial. As Euryalus advised you need to get consensus before changes that may be controversial can be made. At the moment there is a backlog of edit requests and yours is number 52 out of 80. You will need to explain all the changes you are requesting in detail: a recommended format is:
- Information to be added or removed: ADD TEXT HERE
- Explanation of issue: ADD TEXT HERE
- References supporting change: ADD URL AT LEAST
- Signature ~~~~
- When you have explained the requested changes you could post on Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board to get more attention. TSventon (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm confused. I've put the changes above. The current section is out of date. The party affiliations need to be removed as they are no longer correct. All of this information is available on the City of Melbourne website, which is also listed above. I'm not sure what I need to do next, apologies.