Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hokushin-ron
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:20, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:20, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hokushin-ron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The whole article is a paraphrase of an alternate history novel from a book "Rising Sun Victorious". There is absolutely no proof in the article that Hokushin-ron existed in reality. I suggest the article would be deleted unless some reliable sources are provided. Elmor (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: an alternate history novel is not a reliable source. Most of this sounds plausible enough that I wouldn't want to call it a hoax, but without any good sources, it's all guesses, crystal ball reading, and OR. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per Bahamut. Anotherclown (talk) 01:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.