Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shana Ting Lipton
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:25, 7 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Shana Ting Lipton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person seems to exist and to have written for the LA Times--that much is verified. Notability is not: I don't see her being mentioned in reliable sources discussing her work. I did note a lot of external links in Wikipedia articles to various often trivial publications on her website and I think there's been some fluffing going on in the past. Person does not meet the GNG, and is not sufficiently high profile to pass as an important journalist or writer. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 21:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with nom. There is lots of evidence Lipton has written articles, even in very reliable sources like LA Times, but nobody has written about Lipton. There are many journalists in the world who publish articles every day, it's normal and what journalists do, but being a journalist is not notable on its own. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Primary sources exist, but not the vital secondary sources that are required for notability, as in WP:42. Qworty (talk) 05:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.