Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Ducasse
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 7 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:21, 7 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pierre Ducasse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NDP also-ran candidate. Run several times but never elected. No notability otherwise. Recommend Redirect, but not sure it this should go to a election candidate page such as New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election or possibly to the New Democratic Party leadership election, 2003 in which he was also a candidate. Suttungr (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the more recent election (where the prior election can be mentioned). Per nom. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Ducasse has received extensive media coverage, particularly when he ran for the federal NDP leadership. CJCurrie (talk) 01:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Further comment: a search for "Pierre Ducasse" yields 665 discrete hits on Factiva and 950 on ProQuest. WP:POLITICIAN's third rule reads as follows: "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article"." I would submit that Ducasse has received such coverage, and I will reiterate that the article should not be deleted. CJCurrie (talk) 21:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I added another reference. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A French Google news archive search also yields some decent results, include significant coverage in influential Le Devoir, which unfortunately is broken and apparently not viewable as a cached file, either. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Is/was an influential person in the NDP. Not only was he a leadership candidate, but he was the party's Quebec lieutenant for a bit. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GNG. Here are a couple of Le Devoir articles. -- Trevj (talk) 11:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Nycole Turmel is getting rather old to run in 2015, and since Pierre Ducasse stood aside for her, he has first claim on the nomination. We have not seen the last of him. Wilfred Day (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.