Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datchet Village F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Datchet Village F.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur football team playing Sunday league football in their local park. Not notable. PROD was removed by an IP with no explanation -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - incredinly low-level, non-notable team. Giant Snowman 21:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could not be less notable realy. Never played in a national competition, so fails NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Amateur football teams aren't really notable. Anyone could make one, actually. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Way below the threshold for WP:FOOTYN Atlas-maker (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ORG. There is some routine coverage of results but nothing that gets remotely close to meeting our notability guidelines. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Obviously NN. It might possibly be worth a sentence or two in the article on Datchet. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.