Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannes Bardach
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:58, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No sources Peacent 03:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hannes Bardach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Probable autobiography by User:Meinereiner, whose only other edits are to Frequentis, the company started by this entrepreneur. There are no references to this article. Shalom Hello 16:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per above; also fails WP:BIO and WP:V. Probable WP:SPAM as well, since this and the Frequentis article are the sole Wiki activities of the creator. RGTraynor 17:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Wikipedia is not an advertising service." I note that Frequentis is up for AfD as well.[1] --Malcolmxl5 07:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as WP:SPAM; as per nom and above. Bearian 23:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is spammy, but he does indeed have an honorary doctorate [2] and a medal from a trade association, so he probably is notable. His company website claims additional awards for him as well. [3]. We're judging the subject, not the article.
- Comment: His company's website is, of course, an unreliable source. RGTraynor 11:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.