Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Wysocki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:22, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Fray. postdlf (talk) 00:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Wysocki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlike the Afd for Isaac Slade (who at least gets a little coverage), I can't find much for Ben Wysocki. There are a couple of interview-the-band-member articles, but that's it. That doesn't constitute individual notability. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to The Fray. All database and news hits/interviews are for Wysocki's relation to the band and nothing independently biographical. As the musician doesn't have notability independent of the band, WP:MUSICBIO says to redirect, as a useful redirect term. Please ping me if non-English or offline sources are found. czar  05:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.