Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 July 14
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:10, 25 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
July 14
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Louie Anderson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Invalid claim for public domain status. Eeekster (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Coolidgebirthplace.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Gives a source but then claims the photo is the uploader's own work. Eeekster (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Louisville Horse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a photo of a sculpture Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, you're right. I uploaded this in 2004, back when I didn't know about derivative works on sculpture. Turns out, it's an unintentional copyvio. (I might add, as an aside, that this is a great example of why we need a more liberal Freedom of Panorama in the U.S. These horse sculptures are symbols of Louisville, placed in public places specifically so people can interact with them, and it would be a boon to society if we could publish photos of them just like we do photos of iconic Louisville buildings and natural landmarks.) But the law is the law, and I guess we have to delete this. – Quadell (talk) 11:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sepid Div.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Erroneously claimed as PD-old, possibly because the uploader thought the form of the book page suggested an old manuscript; however, the painting is certainly modern (mid or late 20th century) and likely copyrighted. No source (except for another Wikipedia file) and no author attribution. Original upload on ar-wp is attributed to one Kazem Saeedi, apparently an Iranian painter. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was the uploader, and I obtained the image from the Arabic language Wikipedia which has it tagged as their equivalent of {{pd-old}}. [1] Anyway, I appreciate that Future Perfect has replaced the image with another, so I don't have any objection to deleting this file. PhilKnight (talk) 21:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.