Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Next Generation – Narada Sampler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:08, 20 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Next Generation – Narada Sampler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article. Fails WP:NALBUMS. MSJapan (talk) 06:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist Music1201 talk 17:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 17:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Another one! This clearly fails GNG and WP:NALBUMS. There is literally no independent third party coverage and I don't see any other criteria for NALBUM being fulfilled either. Compilations albums generally tend to be not notable anyway. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.