Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 Edinburgh City F.C. season
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- 2015–16 Edinburgh City F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article offers no more content or context than available at Edinburgh City F.C. Exxy (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 20. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NSEASONS - I can't see how you could create a season article about a Scottish club outside the Scottish Professional Football League that would satisfy WP:GNG. Non-league clubs only normally get coverage from the local paper (if that), with some (Scottish) national coverage if they progress in the Scottish Cup to play league teams. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. GiantSnowman 17:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTSTATS and since this fails WP:GNG. Steel1943 (talk) 01:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.