Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Melik Haykaz Palace is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
Abrvagl my question to you is, why did you revert [1][2] Kevo327 when cited 2 sources aren't reliable? I just looked at your contributions and you didn't edit for almost a week. It seems like whenever Kevo edits (which also happened to be today), you follow him around, still. Did you forget recent ANI and the hounding you were advised against? This is just a testament that you aren't planning to stop it anytime soon. You had literally had 0 edits in this article prior to today, and bam, you're edit-warring now with Kevo (again) out of nowhere. A. C. Santacruz I'm sure you remember this since you advised Abrvagl against hounding. There is clearly a pattern here and Abrvagl doesn't seem show any change.
Did not find RNS where source "deemed unusable". second source also OK for the referenced part.
Also, Abrvagl, you're well aware of the RSN discussion since you asked about it literally below my thread in Morbidthoughts talk page and received an answer. I would definitely Support a one way IBAN or topic ban at this point. You're just being disruptive, edit-warring and restoring poorly sourced content, and still hounding said user. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]