Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barak Rosen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barak Rosen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Running this as AFD as PROD is contested. Sources given are about the work of the routine work of his companies, not about himself. He owned a company that is notable, but in my opinion, that does not confer notability to him. No sources were given to show that he is notable per WP:BIO. A Google search of his name shows more about a man with the same name killed by gunshot in June 2018. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NOTINHERITED. There's probably an article about Israel-Canada Group that could be written, but Rosen does not seem independently notable and I do not think there is a good merge/redirect here. W 42 18:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED, I concur with what Winner 42 said. He doesn't seem to be notable independently. Moresdi (talk) 21:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Interesting case that is ripe for AfD, not for prodding. Examining the Hebrew sources, there is a lot of WP:SIGCOV that follows this WP:BLP person and his partner as investors, their company, or both. Since the discussion of Barak Rosen is not entirely individual, the main investment vehicle should have a clear preference over the individual at Enwiki, even where the WP:RS chose to highlight the partners over the company. Otherwise we just rehash the same content over and over again. gidonb (talk) 15:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.