Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Adams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:04, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Gerry Adams. Spartaz Humbug! 06:08, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entrepreneur; affiliated with one notable company, but that's insufficient for notability. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or self-promotion. Not notable as a media contributor either. Proposing to convert to a protected redirect to Gerry Adams. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete article as non-notable; Wikipedia is not a newspaper and per nom, redirect name to Gerard Adams, who was the Leader of the Sinn Féin political party (IRA). Kierzek (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are ample sources in the article -- including Huffington Post or NJ.com -- that are the in-depth coverage in reliable and verifiable sources that met the notability standard. Simple assertions that someone is "non-notable" that do not address the existence of robust sources should be given little to no weight. Alansohn (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.