Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mostly Ghostly Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes. More participation herein would have been ideal. The rough consensus from what we have here is to redirect to List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly Ghostly Girl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. It's just another normal episode. Dcbanners (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Give creator a week to create an article that conforms to WP:GNG. If not done by then, Redirect to List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes#ep29 and tag with {{R to list entry}}. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 18:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Biblioworm 04:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of The Haunted Hathaways episodes (NOT #ep29) - Since we have a List of eps it may aswell be redirected there, I've chosen not to redirect to "#ep29" tho as it's unlikekly anyone will ever search for the episode names and if they do it may (or may not) be confusing. –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.