Talk:Ali Amin Gandapur

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ali Amin Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616170111/http://www.saach.tv/2013/06/13/kpk-to-get-11-more-ministers-today/ to http://www.saach.tv/2013/06/13/kpk-to-get-11-more-ministers-today/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding an Edit war

Pinging SheriffIsInTown, instead of engaging in an edit war, I suggest we talk about it here. I agree about moving the Sobia Shahid audio to her page, but I'm confused why you keep deleting my other edits. Mine are neutral, unlike yours, where you add the claim "Critics argue that his appointment as Chief Minister has hurt the party's image and ability to govern effectively." He's only been in power for three days, so how did you come to this conclusion?? WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critics are talking about his appointment as Chief Minister which had already happened, not about his governance performance but I removed the "ability to govern" part. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, basically you're admitting you came up with the governance part which indicates you have a bias. I don't think you should be editing this article, and I'm sure others would agree. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following is what the source say exactly, I did not come up with anything, this was as per source.

Critics argue that such appointments undermine the party's credibility and its ability to govern effectively.

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I apologize for the accusation and have started a request on a dispute resolution. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiEnthusiast1001 We have a talk thread open here and we have a WP:DRN discussion open, why wouldn’t you wait for a resolution and instead go for another revert, this is not called "avoiding the edit war." Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed the issues you had a problem with and now there's nothing left to debate. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you did not address all the issues. You still removed the content about his misogynistic behavior toward Maryam and added a few cherrypicked comparably less offensive of his comments. If we are not summarizing his behavior then we are not adding only specific comments then we are adding everything he said. He talked about slapping her face in a public rally, you excluded that and tried to pacify it by making it look like that his comments were only about corruption. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit I made showed exactly what he said, and frankly, it revealed more of his "misogynistic" behavior compared to your edit. Your edit didn't mention the slapping incident; you only referred to "provocative and sexist comments about Maryam Nawaz with aggressive language." The term "provocative" typically refers to sexually suggestive remarks, but talking about slapping someone or discussing corruption doesn't fit that description. You're welcome to include his remarks about slapping her; this should resolve our issue, no? WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was my text:

Gandapur is regarded as one of the "most misogynistic" politicians in the nation, having made provocative and sexist comments about Maryam Nawaz with aggressive language.

And this is what source stated (we add what sources state):

Ali Amin Gandapur is one of the most vile and misogynistic politicians in the country. Here he is making sexist, inflammatory comments about Maryam Nawaz before a charged crowd using violent language. Horrifying to imagine he could be the CM of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you that "provocative" isn't the right word here, and you wrote it yourself; it's not in the tweet. Also, you added, "Gandapur is regarded as one of the 'most misogynistic'," but who regards him as such? This statement implies it's a shared opinion among a group of people, but its just the viewpoint of one person who wrote the tweet. We're aiming for neutrality here. I believe the problem we have is a misunderstanding of semantics on your part. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can address the "most misogynistic" part but "provocative" means same thing as "inflammatory", I just paraphrased it. Talking about "slapping a woman" is considered "aggressive tone" and "she think she is beautiful" qualifies as a "sexist remark." Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]