User talk:Gabeyc

Stop doubting me!

Please stop saying that user:Gabeyc is my puppet! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabeyg (talk • contribs)

IOrange should be true article, but administrator are too quick in not caring..

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Also..

Release the block at least for my user page. It's illegal to hurt other people's areas although Wikipedia rules say.

Also..

Many administrator is not always good at checking or knowing the article.