Talk:Convention of 1800
Appearance
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Law Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.United States Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.France Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
That French fishing rights off Newfoundland and the Gulf of Saint Lawrence were to be guaranteed. (ARTICLE XXVII.) Those were British possessions, so why did such guarantees show up in a treaty that didn't involve Britain? Nik42 20:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- The text of the treaty says that: Neither party will intermeddle in the Fisheries of the other on it's coast nor disturb the other in the exercise of the rights. Which it now holds or may acquire c the coast of Newfoundland, in the Glulph of Saint Lawrence or elsewhere on the American cons northward of the United States But the whale and seal Fisheries. shall be free to both in every quarter of the world. My guess is that, from the way this reads, the French were expecting to gain those rights in a future treaty with Great Britain (with whom they were also negotiating at the time), and wanted a pledge from the U.S. in writing not to interfere with French fishing vessels in that area. 74.251.200.216 03:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class France articles
- Mid-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages