Jump to content

User talk:Tiptoety

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.91.214.29 (talk) at 17:24, 31 October 2007 (Undid revision 167563494 by Tiptoety (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Why does this article keep getting tagged as blatant advertising? I have read the guidelines and the links provided are verifiable secondary sources. I have no affiliation with Rex Goliath, I simply want to expand wikipedia's offerings of information about beverages.

wtf. Now its gone. Could i at least get my template back?

Thats fine, I'll send it back to the drawing board and try to gather more info. Thanks for your speedy response.

Great, if you have time I will run it by you for a quick review. Thanks again for your help.


Tourism In Quebec

Hi, I just started this page 5 minutes ago... Give me some time to put informations in it please. Bonjour_Quebec

You auto-reverted a number edits to this article claiming I was committing vandalism. I believe my rewrites correct a number of grammar and other issues. Please compare with the version before the changes. Am I still a Wikipedia pariah, or can I get unwarned now?

Got a note from you

a cmpany keeps putting up there self promtoion on the page. i pulled it down. Passage events keeps promoting themselves —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.138.128.188 (talk) 04:00, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

ITV Play Westcountry

I deleted the article because it was completely made up. There is not one word of truth in it. It is, to be blunt, a fictional article. I have now replaced it with a redirect to ITV Play's entry, which will hopefully stop whichever troll started it from recreating it. RobinCarmody, 05:00 BST, August 21, 2007 —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:00, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Deleting Content

I deleted the content and saved it by mistake. I have fully edited the content now for the article on Subramaniam Pillai. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdx-77 (talkcontribs) 22:07, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

I deleted the contents on the LIU, CW Post site labeled "arguments" because 1. I have been to at least 50 wikipedia college and university sites which only state FACTS, not biased grudges/complaints/heresay, etc. Not a single one had an "arguments" section. If they are allowed, they should be placed on the discussion section. These items add no value to the Long Island University site, which is supposed to be informative, objective and based on fact. This is CLEARLY a person(s) personal grudge against the institution. 2. I have a grudge against NYIT and I (in the past, as I now adhere to wikipedia standards) used to add my "arguments" against the school on their wiki site and they were constantly taken down as they were based on my experiences and personal biases and NOT on solid FACT. If my "arguments" were not allowed, neither should the ones on the LIU, CW Post site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.35.249 (talk) 23:16, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

I deleted the references because they were bogus, and to use them in an "encyclopedia" is ridiculous. Even a wiki drone, such as yourself, has the ability to actually read the references. Go check them instead of performing an IMMEDIATE REVERSION of what I did. 66.91.214.29 04:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tip

The author of the article I edited is a close friend of mine.... He is an outstanding writer in Spanish and Knowing the Ballet and him well I took on the edit.. This is the number 4 classical ballet in the world. Ms. Alonso is a personal friend of mine as well.. I am sorry about the summery.. I have no idea how to do that..... LOL Frankly, this is a one time deal for me in all probability.... If you could somehow fix it I would be grateful, as would my friend Migual Cabrera.

Cheers, Sr.Pastel de Manzana

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sar123.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sar123.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Tiptoety 04:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ep1002oregonstatepolice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Tiptoety 15:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism Efforts

From my own talk page:

Did you really mean WP:VP, or did that have to be WP:VPRF? Regardless, both are usefull links, that i will certainly read top to bottom. Also, thanks a lot for your compliment. Im glad that im being usefull around here :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oops. My bad, yes i meant WP:VPRF, but WP:VP is a good page to read up on as well. And you are welcome, keep up the good work! Tiptoety

Editor Review

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/Tiptoety, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tiptoety 20:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Mediation

I would like to comment, but I am not sure of which section I would add one to, and since I am not an "involved party" I didn't know if I could comment. Can you explain that to me? - Rjd0060 05:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a comment. Thanks. I hope that Jeeny thinks about this situation and decides to come back. - Rjd0060 05:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Tiptoety 05:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Turned out well? I supposed it did, other than the fact that a good editor has left. - Rjd0060 06:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that part is not good, but the conflict has stopped instead of getting larger. Not all party's can have the outcome they want (un-fortnightly). I think that Jeeny will ultimately come back to the pedia. Tiptoety 06:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Thanks for all of your work in this situation as well. - Rjd0060 06:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did try, but withdrew my nomination about 10 hours later. A few people commented , and all suggested the same thing to improve on. I will try again in a couple months. - Rjd0060 06:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Be sure to let me know when you try again! Tiptoety 06:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I wouldn't want to canvass, but I appreciate your comment. You'll just have to keep an eye out for me. - Rjd0060 06:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yea i know..... ;) I will keep my eye out for you! Tiptoety 06:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job catching that one, you passed your test, lol. Tiptoety

CSD G1 for user pages

Yes, CSD G1 can apply to a user page. The general CSD criteria (G1 through G12) "apply to all namespaces", including (but not limited to) articles, talk pages, templates, images and user pages. Is there a specific deletion you wanted an opinion on? Cheers, Caknuck 06:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of User:Abraby‎, I'd say this probably does not qualify for a CSD G1 deletion. Not being an expert on Tamil (Tamil Nadu is a province in India) names, my best guess is that the text indicates the user's name and hometown, which would imply a specific meaning and thus would exclude it from being "patent nonsense". There appear to be no other violations of WP:USER or other relevant policies, so the page is fine by me.
If CSD G1 is cited when deleting user pages, it's usually cases of vandalism clean-up (fake user pages created by vandals are uncommon, but do show up from time to time, in which CSD G3 may also apply) or during the periodic clean up of the user and user talk pages for abandoned accounts (in which case, CSD G6 can also be used). Generally, if an editor is actively making positive contributions to the encyclopedia, harmless and/or nonsensical user pages are left alone.
Again, let me know if you have any further questions or concerns, Caknuck 08:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPAM ala COTW

Ladies and Gentlemen its time for another episode of Collaboration of the Week. Last week’s show starring Fort Vancouver National Historic Site & Eastern Oregon received high ratings. This week’s show star two more stubs, Johnny Kitzmiller & John Wesley Davis. As always, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Don’t delay, act today! Aboutmovies 18:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empezardesdecero123

Thanks for the info. I already went to the page and apologized for my ill behavior. Thank you, again!Empezardesdecero123 02:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you! Tiptoety 02:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the link. If he apologized, that's fine. I was just disturbed overall. JuJube 03:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I had made up those usernames. They do not exsist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empezardesdecero123 (talkcontribs) 22:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So when is your Rfa?

The thread title says it all. I've been noticing you more and more around the Wiki, and hope you will stand for Admin soon. You seem to have a good grasp of policy, common sense, and a good heart. It would be a pleasure to support you. Jeffpw 10:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're watchlisted now, so when you do decide the time is right, I'll chime right in let the community know we need another good admin:-P. BY the way, I read your last Rfa and looked through your contributions. I dare say you'll pass with flying colors on the next nomination. Jeffpw 15:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should be an admin too! You'd do a GREAT job! Suprise!

Thanks! Tiptoety 23:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks!

--Bookworm857158367 11:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tiptoety 14:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, Tiptoety, for the heads up regarding my AN/I report. TimidGuy 15:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:User:Jeeny

I've sent her an email a couple days ago, and didn't receive any reply. Hopefully she'll check in sometime. Thanks. - Rjd0060 19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks! That's my first compliment. 2 Questions.

  • Can I delete all the warnings off my page?
  • Where do you get all those coll things for your page??

Empezardesdecero123 22:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but how do i archive them. They are ugly!Empezardesdecero123 22:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did that! Could you please go to my talk page and check out my archives to see if i did it correctly?Empezardesdecero123 23:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Who's your adoptee?? Empezardesdecero123 23:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I signed up to get an adoptee! Empezardesdecero123 23:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, how do i get a wikimood??Empezardesdecero123 23:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How many do I need?Empezardesdecero123 23:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! I guess i will have to wait a while! I'm gonna take myself off! TNX! How embarrasing!Empezardesdecero123 23:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im gonna have to make 413 more edits! BTW, where do I get a wikimood?Empezardesdecero123 23:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Email

I am going to reply to your email momentarily as this conversation needs to happen privately. - Rjd0060 22:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Tiptoety 22:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I talked to a steward too, and they said to go to ANI. Can you do that? - Rjd0060 23:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I am going to be here, and I'll follow up on the report you make. Thanks - Rjd0060 23:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I emailed you with the info. Jeffpw 23:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user sentriclecub

My page was deleted on a chess variation arising from the dutch-leningrad defense opening. I only saved the page so I could preview it, i wasn't done. I read wikipedia's FAQ for first-time-users and was following the guidelines. Sentriclecub 22:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

replied on Sentriclecub's talk page Tiptoety 23:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

RE:Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar. A sigh of relief. Good work on your part as well. - Rjd0060 00:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Hi, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page, I had no idea that 24.226.XXX.X was on my user page. Maybe I should start one of those vandalism counters on my page! Ha. :) -BlueAmethyst .:*:. 01:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANI and thread archiving

Hi Tiptoety. This is why it is always suggested to archive/close discussions when people seem to calm down and went to bed ;) Now they woke up and came to argue about something that no admin would sort out. Thanks. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 09:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, thanks for the message! Tiptoety 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]