Talk:List of Celebrity Deathmatch episodes

Posting new fights without sources

Can those who are adding new fights post their sources? The number of fake fights added in the past has led me to doubt the veracity of any new additions to this page. Because of this, I added some external links to link to the TVGuide.com episode list, but it was removed for no reason. Links to reliable sources are exactly what this article needs to reduce the skepticism of new information TheHornyBug 20:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please get this article protected? The vandalism (adding fake fights that are effin stupid) is really getting out of hand. Agitpop 14:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, since our troll is now starting to blank the discussion page as well, I'd argue that we follow these guidelines[1] and block the troll. Everybody agreeing with that? Agitpop 10:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This article needs to be protected. I've requested one of the vandals to be blocked twice now, but each time his block ends, he just comes back and vandalizes again. TheHornyBug 00:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, he came back today and, again, went straight to vandalizing. I've also seen several other random IPs adding unsourced information so I will try to get the article semi-protected today. TheHornyBug 00:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing the page as an unregistered user, which I suppose was stupid on my part, and even posting this will arouse suspicion to me, but all I've tried to do is delete the fake fights that the real trolls put up. I was wondering how I can go about requesting that my username, BigManFanelli, be allowed to edit the page again so I can delete the newest fake fights. BigManFanelli 12:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once your account is four days old, you should be able to edit again. And nah, no one's suspicious of you, but now that this article is semi-protected, it shouldn't be as hard to maintain. TheHornyBug 22:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can not editing list of Celebrity Deathmatch Episodes, can be not act or disabled. Martin 21:42 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Someone is vandalizing this article again this time they posted fights of jackass.Stop vandalizing this article.R.Bobby

I got it all deleted this is there warning.Favi4et 19:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Someone did it again. Favi4et 20:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC) You know what were going to do this the hard way. Favi4et 20:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) exept for the Parody vs. Comedy[reply]

I've had our most recent troll blocked indefinitely. So we won't have to worry about him for awhile. TheHornyBug 22:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they want the matches but they going to ask you bug just like i ask you. Favi4et 02:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Just leave the parody vs comedy there because its already confirmed. Favi4et 02:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once more I had to revert vandalism... dang, this is starting to get annoying. Anyway: Favi4et. If the "Comedy vs Parody" matches are confirmed give us one reliable (!) source and we'll keep it there. Until that happens it's going to get deleted until this episode is officially announce on TVGuide.com or on MTV. Agitpop 21:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weird Al vs Marlon Wayans
T.I. vs Danielle Harris
Jamie Lynn Spears vs Miley Cyrus

this i found in my bookmark. Favi4et but sombody dosent want to add them because he thinks im telling a lie. OK Yes i must admit I belive the whole season 7 thing was pure bogus and pretty badly designed but yet prohibiting everyone from editing is a little bit out of hand, people can add what theu}y want! If they add fake garbage we will erase it, after all it's just a matter of clicking buttons! I propose to let people edit again and i will supervise people don't add new fights without sources and if they don't have sources i will erase the fights myself, Kgman6 10:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No spoilers

Don't post the results of the fights before they get aired,please.R.Bobby

All results posted have already been aired. There is also a spoiler warning at the top of the page. TheHornyBug 02:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding pictures

I've noticed with other wiki pages that give details on episodes, there are pictures depicted from that episode. I was wondering if, assuming it's ok with everyone else, we put still images from the fights along with the rest of the episode's description...of course, just an idea--Animé Dan 13:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

      It could also help to put some videos too. 75.82.238.232 23:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When adding fight results...

If anyone adds the results of a fight, they should at least try to minimize grammatical errors. I've spent many mornings at school trying to improve the state of this list. Other contriutors should try to improve it as well. Link 486 12:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm also not fond of a lot of the additional notes people are adding. The table is looking cluttered with all the notes in parentheses. Anyone else agree that we should try to keep the tables as succinct as possible? TheHornyBug 19:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another notice: If you don't know proper grammar and, for some reason, make it unreadable, DO NOT POST! Also, please post the cause of death ONLY; stuff like Mischa Barton's thumbs getting sliced off doesn't count. Link 486 12:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protect This Page

I've had enough of anonymous users vandalizing this article. Please protect it ASAP. Professional Gamer 21:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It has to be protected and revised. A note to anyone: If your grammar skills are insufficient, DO NOT POST. I may not be an admin, but I want this article to actually be readable. Link 486 12:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's perma block 81.68.92.38 by one of the administrators. He vandalized the tables long enough and it's time for him to pay the consequences. Professional Gamer 19:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, considering all of the vandalism has been done by the same guy, protecting is unnecessary. I've had our persistent troll 81.68.92.38 blocked once again. Let's keep it unprotected unless he comes back under a different IP. TheHornyBug 09:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How 'bout this? We perma-block him, and that will be the end of it. As Professional Gamer said, he's vandalized the tables long enough and it's time for him to pay the consequences. Link 486 20:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect this article. If you can't protect it, that means you're letting this guy do more damage to the episodes. Please protect it. That way, 81.68.92.38 cannot add fake fights. Professional Gamer 19:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we just make it so that only established users can edit it? Y'know, to keep the anonymous guys far away. Think about it... 81.68.92.38 won't wreck it again, it'll be protected against everyone else who uses an anonymous account, and we can help restore the article! Whaddya say? Link 486 17:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beavis and Butt-Head

I'm sure that the one on Beavis VS Butt-Head chronologically followed the Beavis and Butt-Head television series, which Beavis killed Butt-Head by slicing him up, but that Beavis has lost some parts of his body, and therefore that's the end of both of them. --PJ Pete

Beavis only lost his hands and at the end of the match was quite clearly fine therefore that's not the end of both of them.- Dogsdoballet

Season 6

Are the Season 6 entries valid? I know seasons 7+ were clearly bogus, but what about Season 6? I don't want to hit good content with the mop, as it were. —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All we need to know is who won

We don't need any injuries the winners received. All we need to know is if they won or not. Link 486 20:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So....

Hey, i'm from the uncyclopedia deathmatch. So you guys have to deal with User:81.68.92.38 too huh? He keeps copying and pasting fights from this wiki and putting them on uncylcopedia and taking them as his own. With awful spelling, of course. And no matter how much other users and I tell him stop or insult him, he just continues to do it. He can't take a hint. and I agree with Link 486 , the injuries should be deleted. 165.166.192.159 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, you have to deal with that piece of crap too? What the hell is wrong with him? He needs to get out of his basement and go to McDonald's for a job application... that's probably all that he's worth. Link 486 15:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is "Fight Specialty"?

If this section remains empty any longer, I'm going to delete it. What good is it if nobody fills it? Link 486 17:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect this page against anonymous users

I don't want his article being butchered by anonymous users anymore. We have to protect it ASAP. Link 486 13:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I don't see a bunch of reverts in the edit history, which are the edits in question? It's not like a few months ago, where editors were inserting made up future episodes. Then, the page did get protected. If it gets bad, I will protect the article, but I'm not seeing anything right now that screams for protection. (I'll be AFK for most of the evening, but I'll probably be looking back in about midnight or 1 am UTC.) —C.Fred (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about you just make it so only ESTABLISHED USERS can edit it? I've already suggested it and think it's a good idea. For some odd reason, though, it hasn't been set into motion. Just think about for a while... it's a decision that wil prove beneficial to the article. We'll also be able to restore it without hindrance. As I said before: Think about it! Link 486 14:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected (again)

Since the 2008 season vandal is back, I've protected the article. If I didn't roll back far enough, and there are bogus 2007 fights in there, let me know if you can't delete them. —C.Fred (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen a lot of grammatical errors in the list as of late. I've done what I can to restore them (starting with Season 3, which I thought I revised yesterday), but I don't want to be the only one. MAKE SURE THAT THE GRAMMAR IS CORRECT WHEN REVISING! Link 486 14:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally. It's protected. Now that way, we won't let 81.68.692.38 vandalize it ever again. 70.45.129.48 02:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Individual episode summaries and pages

I think the time has come for each episode to get its very own page. This article alone is way too large. Roman619 01:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your only options are to cut this down and format it better or find real world information for season articles. Single episodes will immediantly be redirected back to this list (See WP:EPISODE). TTN 01:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you guys think it's too long, you could make a kind of episode guide for each season. Think about it: It will be harder for our CDM list troll to vandalize many matches at once, and we could make the descriptions more detailed. We could make articles for the seasons, and put seperate articles on the page that would lead to the individual episodes, which would show what happened in the episode in greater detail. Also, why not make a Wikiquote article, too? Link 486 (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As TTN states, single episodes will be redirected back to this list - your only options are to cut down what is here or seperate out to season pages but NOT individual episode pages. --Fredrick day (talk) 08:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user:77.163.30.155 keeps vandalizing the article

Please protect it now. Don't you guys know that he is eager to claim this article all of his own? Apparently, you just don't want to protect this article so that way, you'll let him do more vandalizing, rather than protecting this article. Professional Gamer (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Gamer, I agree with you as always. This troll is obviously under the delusion that this is Uncyclopedia. It isn't, but he keeps on messing up the list. We need to protect it against anonymous users, that way he has no chance to mess it up. Please think about it. Link 486 12:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, I see a number of edits made on 28 November from IP addresses that have not beed reverted. I'm not going to protect an article if we're getting constructive edits from IPs. The reverse of that is also true: if I see a number of anonymous edits followed by reverts - especially when the revert is noted "revert vandalism" or "rvv," then it becomes very easy to see that we're getting more noise than signal from the anonymous editors and protection is in order. —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of anonymous users stopped him from ruining it, even though he did'nt reverted it. Sometimes, he comes back and does the damage while we sit here doing nothing. Like Link 486 said, think about it. Professional Gamer (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How come the list still is'nt protected? If you can't protect it, it does'nt matter how many times you try to block him. It does'nt work that way. He'll keep on vandalizing the page once th block expires. Like Link 4786 said, protect it or let him do all the damage again. Either way, just perma-ban him to end his childish acts. Professional Gamer (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The block was appropriate because the vandalism is coming from the same IP. It's a long enough block that, since he appears to be using a static IP, it should hold it for a while. One of two things will happen: if the vandalism doesn't occur again until the block expires, then it's linked to just that IP, and it'll start getting rolling six month or one year blocks. (As a matter of practice, IPs don't get indefinitely blocked.) If more vandalism comes from a new IP, then the article will get protected. The problem is that protection can lock out good editors too. And there's no point trying to figure out who it is and ban them: because the underlying editor has an indefinite block, and because the pattern of edits here is so clearly vandalism, it's a de facto ban. —C.Fred (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the bigger problem is that he is using sockpuppetry and he comes in here sometimes and perform a surprise edits to completely wreck the list in a flash. And besides, he'll keep on messing up the lists not because Link and I were trying to warn him, but because he hates this list and tries to modify it all of his own, just to make it look "brand-new" and always willing to try and claim this as his own. What can we do about it? Professional Gamer (talk) 19:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]