Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Devi (2nd nomination)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO, only seems to be notable to a small group of people. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Though I found three refernces to Ms. Devi as shown here:San Francisco Chronicle [1]- The Times of India [2]- Asian Times [3], they only mention Ms. Devi in passing and are not the focus of the articles. In addition, I could find no statement of Notability to establish inclusion. Sorry to say delete at this time. ShoesssS ^Talk 18:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - For starters she wasn't what I would consider to be a pornographic actress. She never appeared in any porn movies. She made no hardcore videos. She was pretty much just a nude model. As a model, she would fall under "significant "cult" following" in WP:ENTERTAINER. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hondo77 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Gotta Agree with the "significant "cult" following, though it's kinda weak she was notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anadin (talk • contribs) 20:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't know how people can argue she wasn't a porn actress while she's under the categories: Category:Asian American porn stars, Category:American porn stars, Category:Porn stars who committed suicide, Category:Indian porn stars and Category:Female porn stars. She doesn't meet WP:PORNBIO, and I don't think she is notable enough for her own article. Xeron220 (talk) 21:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Same rationale as Shoessss. Articles do not provide significant coverage and two of them are not intellectually independent from each other (same author basically plagiarising herself) Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)a[reply]
Keep - per above --THFFF (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]