Jump to content

Talk:The Jackson 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rafichamp (talk | contribs) at 01:44, 6 February 2009 (→‎100 million records sold: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured articleThe Jackson 5 is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 25, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 30, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 21, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
November 12, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
April 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article

GA

Ok, this article used to featured a long time ago. Now i dont think we will get it back to FA but we are gonna attempt GA in the next 3/4 weeks. So lets get started. Sourcing is a priority. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 18:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reunion rumors... (RESOLVED)

Though Jermaine has talked about the brothers reuniting, I doubt that this will come to fore wishing since Michael is working on his new album and it seems most of the Jackson brothers except Tito have retired unless Michael is open again to collaborate with them on an album. So I vote that we remove the "2008 reunion" paragraph from this article. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 21:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i think MJ is staying solo, he can still shift records as seen with Thriller 25, the rules have changed. Lets get ride of it, wikipedia isnt a crystal ball. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cut down (DONE)

We need to cut the article down, before we start sourcing, there is stuff that doesnt need to be there. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So is all of this done? Cheers, Kodster (You talkin' to me?) (Stuff I messed up) 22:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, done. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Randy as a member of the Jackson Five

I believe there was a period when the Jackson 5 (under that name) officially had all six brothers as members. The name change came about because Motown owned the rights to that name, not specifically because Jermaine left. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure about that, if always heard that Randy replaced Jermaine. — Realist2 (Who's Bad?) 19:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they had to change their name and Randy did replace Jermaine, lol. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 21:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should I take the Jacksons out of the category as a "funk" group?

I have thought about this for a while and though I know there were elements in the Jackson 5's and Michael's music that was funk-esque, they didn't really struck me as a funk outfit. Maybe pop-funk but, I don't know... what you guys think? BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 02:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, besides it's a sub genre anyway. — Realist2 20:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

100 million records sold

Jackson 5 sold over 100 million records; sources

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Jackson-5 http://www.nypost.com/seven/03232008/news/nationalnews/jacko_clan_in_a_deep_funk_103188.htm?page=0