I have decided that posts here will generally be answered both here, and on the poster's talk page. I will generally include a copy of the post I am answering as well. Please discuss article edits on the appropriate article talk pages, and be wp:CIVIL. At my sole discretion, posts I feel don't meet these requirements will be either archived, if I value them, or simply deleted, if I do not.
If this displeases you, please feel free to post elsewhere. Please see wp:talk for additional guidance.
I am only a human, I promise I will make mistakes. I revert things that appear to be clear vandalism, or dubious and unsourced, or most aggressively, dubious and unsourced/weakly-sourced and Biographical. I think that Biographical articles are the greatest risk that Wikipedia faces.
When you find I have made a mistake, please undo my edit and say why in the edit description. If you are VERY kind, and there is a useful Wikipedia guideline or consensus, please link it. :)
If I have reverted your edit, whether vandalism, otherwise problematic, or mistakenly, please don't abuse me with vandalism here. It will be quickly reverted.
I am not here all the time. If you leave me a message and I don't respond quickly, please don't be offended. I will get back to you as soon as I can after I see your message.
Other things:
I am not an admin. I will never be an admin. I am too loud, too wrong too often, way too politically incorrect, and too unable to learn the "kagillion" WP rules. I am an editor. I will do my best to be a useful Wikipedia editor. That is all.
I am not going to look up your sources for you. If you add content and I flag it {{CN}}, or cut it to the talk page for possible inclusion, beating me up... because you did a quick SuperWombatSearchEngine9 query and found the source you should have included the 1st time... will only make me smile.
I make small edits. I put an edit summary on each one, almost without fail. Thus, if an article is badly wounded, I may make 100 edits to it to fix 100 spelling, grammar, structure, and sourcing errors. Please try to survive somehow. Screaming at me that I am editing too much will again only make me smile.
If someone posts on a talk page covering 23 points, I may answer with a 23 point response. This *absolutely enrages* some individuals. As a courtesy, I will attempt to remember their preferences, and not reply to their posts. For those times I forget, I apologize in advance, and I invite the reader to ignore my response: I will do my best.
In those rare cases where an editor cannot even bear to read a talk page where I post, if the article is one I don't care about, I won't post there any more. If it is, however, I again apologize in advance, and again I invite the reader to ignore my response.
One day, a wise man listened impassively as his critics berated and insulted him during a discussion. After the end of the discussion, an observer asked him how it made him feel to be treated so. The elder smiled for a moment, then said "It makes me very happy." A student, who had been upset already, demanded "How can it make you happy to be treated so!?!?" His teacher explained, still smiling, "Because, my impetuous young friend, I am not them."
Thanks for your message. No worries. Even though we ended up in issues in the past, but I still appreciate your efforts. I will co-operate with you and will expect the same. Every issue has a solution :) ... Regards ....--99.51.223.161 (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]