Jump to content

International Space Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by James Doehring (talk | contribs) at 01:08, 14 November 2009 (→‎Assembly and structure: link updated). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

International Space Station
A planform view of the ISS backdropped by the Earth. In view are the station's four large, golden-coloured solar array wings, two on either side of the station, mounted to a central truss structure. Further along the truss are six large, white radiators, three next to each pair of arrays. In-between the solar arrays and radiators is a cluster of pressurised modules, arranged in an elongated T shape, also attached to the truss. A set of blue solar arrays are mounted to the module at the aft end of the cluster.
The flags of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Denmark, Spain, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Brazil, Japan, Norway, and Russia.
The International Space Station on 8 September 2009 as seen from the departing Space Shuttle Discovery during STS-128.
A silhouette of the ISS shown orbiting the Earth, contained within a blue shield with the words 'International Space Station' at the top.
ISS Insignia
Station statistics
COSPAR ID1998-067A
SATCAT no.25544Edit this on Wikidata
Call signAlpha
Crew6
Launch1998–2011
Launch padKSC LC-39,
Baikonur LC-1/5 & LC-81/23
Mass303,663 kg
(669,461 lb)
(15 October 2009)[needs update]
Length73 m (240 ft)
from Harmony to Zvezda
Width108.5 m (356 ft)
along truss, arrays extended
Pressurised volume358 m³
(12,626 ft³)
(15 October 2009)[needs update]
Atmospheric pressure
101.3 kPa (29.91 inHg)
Periapsis altitude341 km altitude (184 nmi)
(15 September 2009)
Apoapsis altitude353 km altitude (191 nmi)
(15 September 2009)
Orbital inclination51.6419 degrees
Orbital speed27,743.8 km/h
(17,239.2 mph, 7,706.6 m/s)
Orbital periodc.91 minutes
Days in orbit9444
Days occupied8733
No. of orbitsc.149047
Orbital decay2 km/month
Statistics as of 28 September
(unless noted otherwise)
References:[1][2][3][4][5]
Configuration
The components of the ISS in an exploded diagram, with modules on-orbit highlighted in orange, and those still awaiting launch in blue or pink.
Station elements as of November 2009
(exploded view)

The International Space Station (ISS) is an internationally developed research facility currently being assembled in Low Earth Orbit. On-orbit construction of the station began in 1998 and is scheduled to be completed by 2011, with operations continuing until at least 2015.[6] The station can be seen from the Earth with the naked eye,[7] and, as of 2009, is the largest artificial satellite in Earth orbit, with a mass larger than that of any previous space station.[8] The ISS serves as a long-term research laboratory in space, with experiments in fields including biology, human biology, physics, astronomy and meteorology being carried out daily in the station's microgravity environment.[9][10][11] The station also provides a safe testing location for efficient, reliable spacecraft systems that will be required for long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars.[12] The ISS and its experiments are operated by long-duration Expedition crews, with the station being continuously staffed since the first resident crew, Expedition 1, arrived on 2 November 2000. This has provided an uninterrupted human presence in space for the last User:Colds7ream/Ageand.[13] As of 11 October 2009, the crew of Expedition 21 is aboard.[14]

The station represents a union of several space station projects including the US Space Station Freedom, the Soviet/Russian Mir-2, the European Columbus and the Japanese Kibō.[15][16] Budget issues with each station, however, led to the separate projects being merged into a single multi-national space station.[15] The ISS project began in 1994 with the Shuttle-Mir programme,[17] and the first module of the station, Zarya, was launched in 1998 by Russia.[15] Assembly has been ongoing ever since, with a complex of pressurised modules, external trusses and other components being launched by US Space Shuttles, Russian Proton rockets and Russian Soyuz rockets.[16] As of July 2009, the station consists of ten pressurised modules and an extensive Integrated Truss Structure (ITS). Power is provided by sixteen large solar arrays mounted on the external truss, in addition to four smaller arrays on Russian modules.[18] The station is maintained at an orbit between 278 km (173 mi) and 460 km (286 mi) altitude, and travels at an average speed of 27,724 kilometres (17,227 mi) per hour, completing 15.7 orbits per day.[19]

The ISS is operated as a joint project between the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Russian Federal Space Agency (RKA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and the European Space Agency (ESA).[20] Ownership and utilisation of the station is set out via several intergovernmental treaties and agreements,[21] with Russia retaining full ownership of its own modules,[22] and the rest of the station being allocated between the other international partners.[21] The cost of the station project has been estimated by ESA as €100 billion over a course of 30 years,[23] although cost estimates vary between US$35 billion and US$160 billion, making the ISS the most expensive object ever constructed.[24] This large cost has meant that the ISS programme has been the target of various criticisms over its financing, research capabilities and technical design.[25]

The various sections of the station are controlled by several mission control centres on the ground, including MCC-H, TsUP, Col-CC, ATV-CC, JEM-CC, HTV-CC and MSS-CC.[26] The station is serviced by a wide variety of manned and unmanned spacecraft, including the Soyuz spacecraft, Progress spacecraft, Space Shuttle, Automated Transfer Vehicle, and H-II Transfer Vehicle,[26] and has been visited by astronauts and cosmonauts from 15 different nations.[8]

Purpose

The International Space Station serves primarily as a research laboratory, offering an advantage over spacecraft such as NASA's Space Shuttle because it is a long-term platform in the space environment, allowing long-duration studies to be performed, both on specific experiments and on the human crews that operate them.[8][27] The presence of a permanent crew also means that the station offers benefits over unmanned spacecraft as experiments can be monitored, replenished, repaired or replaced as required by the crew, as can other components of the spacecraft itself. Scientists on the ground, therefore, have swift access to their data and can modify experiments or launch new ones as and when required, benefits generally unavailable on specialised unmanned spacecraft.[27]

Crews flying long-term expeditions, lasting several months, conduct scientific experiments each day (approximately 160 man-hours a week)[28] across many fields, including human research (space medicine), life sciences, physical sciences, and Earth observation, as well as education and technology demonstrations.[9] As of the conclusion of Expedition 15, 138 major science investigations had been conducted on the ISS since the launch of Zarya in 1998.[29] Scientific findings, in fields ranging from basic science to exploration research, are being published every month.[12]

The ISS also provides a testing location for efficient, reliable spacecraft systems that will be required for long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars, allowing for equipment to be evaluated in the relatively safe location of Low Earth Orbit. This provides experience in maintaining, repairing, and replacing systems on-orbit, which will be essential in operating spacecraft further from Earth. This aspect of ISS operations reduces mission risks, and advances the capabilities of interplanetary spacecraft.[12]

In addition to the scientific and research aspects of the station, there are numerous opportunities for educational outreach and international cooperation. The crews of the ISS provide educational opportunities for students back home on Earth, including student-developed experiments, educational demonstrations, student participation in classroom versions of ISS experiments, NASA investigator experiments, and ISS engineering activities. The ISS programme itself, and the international cooperation that it represents, allows 14 nations to live and work together in space, providing important lessons that can be taken forward into future multi-national missions.[30]

Scientific research

Side by side images of a candle flame (left) and a glowing translucent blue hemisphere of flame (right).
A comparison between fire on Earth (left) and fire in a microgravity environment (right), such as that found on the ISS.

One of the main goals of the ISS is to provide a place to conduct experiments that require one or more of the unusual conditions present on the station. The primary fields of research include biology, physics, astronomy, and meteorology.[10][11] The 2005 NASA Authorization Act designated the US segment of the International Space Station as a national laboratory with a goal to increase the use of the ISS by other Federal entities and the private sector.[31]

One research goal is to improve the understanding of long-term space exposure on the human body. Subjects currently under study include muscle atrophy, bone loss, and fluid shift. The data will be used to determine whether space colonisation and lengthy human spaceflight are feasible. As of 2006, data on bone loss and muscular atrophy suggest that there would be a significant risk of fractures and movement problems if astronauts landed on a planet following a lengthy space cruise.[32]

A variety of large scale medical studies are being conducted aboard the ISS via the National Space and Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI). Prominent among these is the Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity study in which Astronauts (including former ISS Commanders Leroy Chiao and Gennady Padalka) perform ultrasound scans under the guidance of remote experts to diagnose and potentially treat hundreds of medical conditions in space. Usually, there is no physician onboard the International Space Station and diagnosis of medical conditions is challenging. This study's techniques are now being applied to cover professional and Olympic sports injuries as well as ultrasound scans performed by non-expert operators in populations such as medical and high school students. It is anticipated that remotely guided ultrasound scans will have application on Earth in emergency and rural care situations, where access to a trained physician is often rare.[33][34][35]

Researchers are investigating the effect of the station's near-weightless environment on the evolution, development and growth, and the internal processes of plants and animals. In response to some of this data, NASA wants to investigate microgravity's effects on the growth of three-dimensional, human-like tissues, and the unusual protein crystals that can be formed in space.[10]

The physics of fluids in microgravity is being investigated, enabling researchers to better model the behaviour of fluids in the future. Because of the ability to almost completely combine fluids in microgravity, physicists are interested in investigating the combinations of fluids that will not normally mix well on Earth. In addition, by examining reactions that are slowed down by low gravity and temperatures, scientists hope to gain new insight regarding superconductivity.[10]

Materials science is an important part of the research activity aboard the station, with the goal of reaping economic benefits by improving techniques used on the ground. Experiments are intended to provide a better understanding of the relationship between processing, structure, and properties so the conditions required on Earth to achieve desired materials properties can be reliably predicted.[36]

Other areas of interest include the effect of the low gravity environment on combustion, studying the efficiency of burning and control of emissions and pollutants. These findings may improve our understanding of energy production, and in turn have an economic and environmental impact. There are also plans to use the ISS to examine aerosols, ozone, water vapour, and oxides in Earth's atmosphere, as well as cosmic rays, cosmic dust, antimatter, and dark matter in the universe.[10]

Origins

A cluster of cylindrical modules with projecting feathery solar arrays and a space shuttle docked to the lower module. In the background is the blackness of space, and, in the lower right corner, Earth.
Space Shuttle Atlantis docked to Mir on STS-71, during the Shuttle-Mir Programme

Originating during the Cold War, the International Space Station represents a union of several space station projects from various nations. During the early 1980s, NASA had planned to launch a modular space station called Freedom as a counterpart to the Soviet Salyut and Mir space stations. Whilst the Soviets were planning to construct Mir-2 in the 1990s as a replacement for Mir.[15] Because of budget and design constraints, however, Freedom never progressed past mock-ups and minor component tests.

With the fall of the Soviet Union ending the Cold War and Space Race, Freedom was nearly cancelled by the United States House of Representatives. The post-Soviet economic chaos in Russia also led to the cancellation of Mir-2, though only after its base block, DOS-8, had been constructed.[15] Similar budgetary difficulties were being faced by other nations with space station projects, prompting US administration officials to start negotiations with partners in Europe, Russia, Japan, and Canada in the early 1990s to begin a collaborative, multi-national, space station project.[15]

In June 1992, then US president George H. W. Bush and Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed to cooperate on space exploration by signing the Agreement between the United States of America and the Russian Federation Concerning Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes. This agreement called for setting up a short, joint space programme, during which one US astronaut would board the Russian space station Mir and two Russian cosmonauts would board a space shuttle.[15]

In September 1993, US Vice-president Al Gore and Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin announced plans for a new space station, which eventually became the International Space Station.[37] They also agreed, in preparation for this new project, that the US would be heavily involved in the Mir programme in the years ahead, as part of an agreement that later included Space Shuttle orbiters docking with Mir.[17]

The ISS programme was planned to combine the proposed space stations of all participating space agencies, including Freedom, Mir-2 (with DOS-8 later becoming Zvezda), ESA's Columbus, and the Japanese Kibō laboratory. When the first module, Zarya, was launched in 1998, the station was expected to be completed by 2003. Because of delays, however, the estimated completion date has been put back to 2011.[38]

Space station

Assembly and structure

An astronaut uses a screwdriver to activate a docking port on an ISS module.
Astronaut Ron Garan during an STS-124 ISS assembly spacewalk
Expedition 18 commander Michael Fincke's video tour of the habitable part of the ISS from January 2009

The assembly of the International Space Station, a major endeavour in space architecture, began in November 1998. As of May 2009 the station is 82.8% complete.[3]

The first segment of the ISS, Zarya, was launched into orbit on November 20, 1998 on a Russian Proton rocket, followed two weeks later by the first of three node modules, Unity, launched aboard STS-88. This bare 2-module core of the ISS remained unmanned for the next one and a half years until the Russian module Zvezda was added in July 2000, allowing a maximum crew of three people to occupy the ISS continuously. The first resident crew, Expedition 1, arrived in November 2000, midway between STS-92 and STS-97, which added of two segments of the station's Integrated Truss Structure, the Z1 and P6 trusses. These components provided the embryonic station with communications, guidance, electrical grounding (on Z1) and power via a pair of solar array wings located on the P6 truss.[39]

Over the next two years the station continued to expand with a Soyuz-U rocket delivering the Pirs docking compartment. Meanwhile, and Space Shuttles Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour delivered the Destiny laboratory and Quest airlock to orbit, in addition to the station's main robot arm, the Canadarm2, and several more segments of the Integrated Truss Structure.[39]

The expansion schedule was interrupted by the destruction of the Space Shuttle Columbia on STS-107 in 2003, with the resulting hiatus in the Space Shuttle programme halting station assembly until the launch of Discovery on STS-114 in 2005.[40]

The official resumption of assembly was marked by the arrival of Atlantis, flying STS-115, delivering the station's second set of solar arrays. These were later followed by several more truss segments and a third set of arrays on STS-116, STS-117, and STS-118. This major expansion of the station's power generating capabilities meant that more pressurised modules could be accommodated, and as a result the Harmony node and Columbus European laboratory were added. These were followed shortly after by the first two components of Kibō, the Japanese Experiment Module. In March 2009, STS-119 marked the completion of the Integrated Truss Structure with the installation of the fourth and final set of solar arrays, while the final section of Kibō was delivered by Endeavour in July 2009 on STS-127.[39]

As of July 2009, the station consisted of ten pressurised modules and the complete Integrated Truss Structure. Awaiting launch is the third and final American node, Tranquillity, a Permanent Logistics Module, the European Robotic Arm, several Russian modules and the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS). Assembly is expected to be completed by 2011, by which point the station will have a mass in excess of 400 metric tons (440 short tons).[3][38]

Pressurised modules

When completed, the ISS will consist of fourteen pressurised modules with a combined volume of around 1,000 m³. These modules include laboratories, docking compartments, airlocks, nodes and living quarters. Ten of these components are already in orbit, with the remaining six awaiting launch. Each module was or will be launched either by the Space Shuttle, Proton rocket or Soyuz rocket.[39]

Module Assembly mission Launch date Launch system Nation Isolated View
Zarya (FGB) 1A/R 20 November 1998 Proton-K Russia (Builder)
USA (Financier)
A lone module floats against the blackness of space. The module consists of a stepped cylinder with a flattened cone at one end and a spherical docking compartment at the other. Two blue solar arrays project from the sides of the module. [41]
The first component of the ISS to be launched, Zarya provided electrical power, storage, propulsion, and guidance during initial assembly. The module now serves as a storage compartment, both inside the pressurised section and in the externally mounted fuel tanks.
Unity (Node 1) 2A 4 December 1998 Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-88 USA A module floats against the blackness of space. The module is a metallic cylinder, with two large, white circles visible on it. A black cone is visible at either end of the module. [42]
The first node module, connecting the American section of the station to the Russian section (via PMA-1), and providing berthing locations for the Z1 truss, Quest airlock, Destiny laboratory and Tranquillity node.
Zvezda (Service Module) 1R 12 July 2000 Proton-K Russia A module consisting of a stepped-cylinder main compartment with a spherical docking compartment at one end. Two blue solar arrays project from the module, with Earth and space in the background. [43]
The station's service module, which provides the main living quarters for resident crews, environmental systems and attitude & orbit control. The module also provides docking locations for Soyuz spacecraft, Progress spacecraft and the Automated Transfer Vehicle, and its addition rendered the ISS permanently habitable for the first time.
Destiny (US Laboratory) 5A 7 February 2001 Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-98 USA A module consisting of a long, metallic cylinder, floats against the blackness of space suspended by the ISS robotic arm. The module has a highly flattened cone at each end, and pieces of ISS and space shuttle hardware are visible to the right of the image. [44][45]
The primary research facility for US payloads aboard the ISS, Destiny is intended for general experiments. The module houses 24 International Standard Payload Racks, some of which are used for environmental systems and crew daily living equipment, and features a 51-centimetre (20 in) optically perfect window, the largest such window ever produced for use in space. Destiny also serves as the mounting point for most of the station's Integrated Truss Structure.
Quest (Joint Airlock) 7A 12 July 2001 Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-104 USA A module suspended in space by the ISS robotic arm. In view are the module's two compartments, the short, wide equipment lock to the left of the image, and the long, narrow crew lock to the left. The Earth and blackness of space are visible in the background, with the blurred corner of another module visible in the foreground, at top-right. [46]
The primary airlock for the ISS, Quest hosts spacewalks with both US EMU and Russian Orlan spacesuits. Quest consists of two segments; the equipment lock, that stores spacesuits and equipment, and the crew lock, from which astronauts can exit into space.
Pirs (Docking Compartment) 4R 14 September 2001 Soyuz-U, Progress M-SO1 Russia A small, cylindrical module, covered in white insulation with docking equipment at one end. In the background are some other modules and some blue solar arrays. [47]
Pirs provides the ISS with additional docking ports for Soyuz and Progress spacecraft, and allows egress and ingress for spacewalks by cosmonauts using Russian Orlan spacesuits, in addition to providing storage space for these spacesuits.
Harmony (Node 2) 10A 23 October 2007 Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-120 Europe (Builder)
USA (Operator)
A module shown with Earth in the background. The module, a metallic cylinder, is pictured at the end of the ISS robotic arm, with the blackness of space and some other ISS components visible at the bottom of the image. A black cone is attached to one end of the module, and a large white circle is also visible. [48]
The second of the station's node modules, Harmony is the utility hub of the ISS. The module contains four racks that provide electrical power, bus electronic data, and acts as a central connecting point for several other components via its six Common Berthing Mechanisms (CBMs). The European Columbus and Japanese Kibō laboratories are permanently berthed to the module, and US Space Shuttle Orbiters dock to the ISS via PMA-2, attached to Harmony's forward port. In addition, the module serves as a berthing port for the Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules during shuttle logistics flights.
Columbus (European Laboratory) 1E 7 February 2008 Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-122 Europe A module seen through a space shuttle window. The module is a metallic cylinder with flattened cones at each end, with a large white circle visible on the end facing the camera. In the background is the wing of a space shuttle, some other ISS hardware and the blackness of space. [49][50]
The primary research facility for European payloads aboard the ISS, Columbus provides a generic laboratory as well as facilities specifically designed for biology, biomedical research and fluid physics. Several mounting locations are affixed to the exterior of the module, which provide power and data to external experiments such as the European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF), Solar Monitoring Observatory, Materials International Space Station Experiment, and Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space. A number of expansions are planned for the module to study quantum physics and cosmology.
Kibō Experiment Logistics Module (JEM–ELM) 1J/A 11 March 2008 Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-123 Japan A module consisting of a short, metallic cylinder with a flattened cone at one end. A number of gold-coloured handrails are visible on the module, along with other pieces of ISS hardware in the background. [51]
Part of the Kibō Japanese Experiment Module laboratory, the ELM provides storage and transportation facilities to the laboratory, with a pressurised section to serve internal payloads and an unpressurised section to serve external payloads.
Kibō Pressurised Module (JEM–PM) 1J 31 May 2008 Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-124 Japan A module consiting of a long, metallic cylinder. The module has a robotic arm attached to the end of the cylinder facing the camera, along with an airlock and several covered windows. On the right-hand side of the module is a Japanese flag. A space shuttle and other ISS hardware is visible in the background, with the blackness of space as the backdrop. [51][52]
Part of the Kibō Japanese Experiment Module laboratory, the PM is the core module of Kibō to which the ELM and Exposed Facility are berthed. The laboratory is the largest single ISS module and contains a total of 23 racks, including 10 experiment racks. The module is used to carry out research in space medicine, biology, Earth observations, materials production, biotechnology, and communications research. The PM also serves as the mounting location for an external platform, the Exposed Facility (EF), that allows payloads to be directly exposed to the harsh space environment. The EF is serviced by the module's own robotic arm, the JEM–RMS, which is also mounted on the PM.
Poisk
(Mini-Research Module 2)
5R 10 November 2009 Soyuz-U, Progress M-MRM2 Russia [53][54]
One of the Russian ISS components, MRM2 will be used for docking of Soyuz and Progress ships, as an airlock for spacewalks and as an interface for scientific experiments.
 
Scheduled to be launched
Module Assembly mission Launch date Launch system Nation Isolated View
Tranquillity
(Node 3)
20A NET 4 February 2010 Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-130 Europe (Builder)
USA (Operator)
A module shown in a hangar. The module is a metallic cylinder, with two large, white circles visible on its sides. The module is shown within a white, cylindrical support structure, with some scaffolding visible at one end. Another module is visible in the lower foreground. [55][56]
The third and last of the station's US nodes, Tranquillity will contain an advanced life support system to recycle waste water for crew use and generate oxygen for the crew to breathe. The node also provides four berthing locations for more attached pressurised modules or crew transportation vehicles, in addition to the permanent berthing location for the station's Cupola.
Cupola 20A NET 4 February 2010 Space Shuttle Endeavour, STS-130 Europe (Builder)
USA (Operator)
A module shown inside a hangar. The module is small, with a short cylindrical section at the bottom and a larger, cone-shaped section at the top. A set of six, trapezoid windows line the sides of the cone, with a round window at the top of the cone, each window covered with a numbered mechanical shutter. [57]
The Cupola is an observatory module that will provide ISS crew members with a direct view of robotic operations and docked spacecraft, as well as an observation point for watching the Earth. The module will come equipped with robotic workstations for operating the SSRMS and shutters to prevent its windows from being damaged by micrometeorites.
Rassvet
(Mini-Research Module 1)
ULF4 NET 14 May 2010 Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-132 Russia [38]
MRM1 will be used for docking and cargo storage aboard the station.
Permanent Logistics Module ULF5 NET 16 September 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-133 Europe (Builder)
USA (Operator)
[58][59][60]
The PLM will house spare parts and supplies, allowing longer times between resupply missions and freeing space in other modules, particularly Columbus. Leonardo will be the MPLM used for this purpose.
Nauka
(Multipurpose Laboratory Module)
3R c. December 2011 Proton-M Russia A computer-generated image of a module. The module is a stepped cylinder covered in white insulation, with a spherical compartment and airlock at one end. Two blue solar arrays project from the module, as does a robotic arm. Several other pieces of ISS hardware, faded to highlight the module, are visible in the background. [38][61]
The MLM will be Russia's primary research module as part of the ISS and will be used for general microgravity experiments, docking, and cargo logistics. The module provides a crew work and rest area, and will be equipped with a backup attitude control system that can be used to control the station's attitude.

Cancelled modules

A small, stubby spaceplane, coloured black on its underside and white on its topside, descending backdropped by a cloudy sky. The words 'United States' and the NASA logo are visible on its sides.
The prototype X-38 lifting body, the cancelled ISS Crew Return Vehicle.

Several modules planned for the station have been cancelled over the course of the ISS programme, whether for budgetary reasons, the modules becoming unnecessary or following the redesign of the station following the 2003 Columbia disaster. The cancelled modules include:

Unpressurised elements

An astronaut, dressed in a white spacesuit, attached to the end of a long, jointed robotic arm covered in white insulation. The Earth's horizon and the blackness of space serves as a backdrop.
Astronaut Stephen K. Robinson anchored to the end of Canadarm2 during STS-114.

In addition to the pressurised modules, the ISS also features a large number of external components. The Integrated Truss Structure (ITS), to which the station's main solar arrays and thermal radiators are mounted, is the largest of these,[18] consisting of ten separate segments together forming a structure 108.5 m (356 ft) long.[3]

The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), a particle physics experiment, is scheduled to be launched on STS-134 in 2010, and will be mounted externally on the ITS. The AMS will search for types of unusual matter by measuring cosmic rays, enabling study of the formation of the universe, and will search for evidence of dark matter and antimatter.[68]

The ITS also serves as a base for the station's main remote manipulator system (RMS), the Mobile Servicing System (MSS), consisting of the Mobile Base System, the Canadarm2, and the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator. The MBS rolls along a rails built into some of the ITS segments to allow the arm to reach all parts of the US segment of the station.[69] The MSS is due to be augmented by an Orbiter Boom Sensor System, due to be installed on STS-133, to increase its reach.[70]

Two other remote manipulator systems are also present in the station's final configuration. The European Robotic Arm, which will service the Russian Orbital Segment, will be launched alongside the Multipurpose Laboratory Module,[71] and the JEM RMS, which services the JEM Exposed Facility,[72], was launched on STS-124 attached to the JEM Pressurised Module. In addition to these robotic arms, two Russian Strela cargo cranes, used for transferring parts and spacewalking cosmonauts around the exterior of the Russian Orbital Segment, are also present on station.[73]

The station in its complete form will also feature several smaller external components, such as the three External Stowage Platforms (ESPs), launched on STS-102, STS-114 and STS-118, which are used for storage of spare parts on the station's exterior. Four ExPRESS Logistics Carriers (ELCs), which will allow experiments to be deployed and conducted in the vacuum of space, and will provide the necessary electricity and computing to process experimental data locally, with delivery currently scheduled for STS-129 in November 2009, STS-134 in July 2010 and STS-133 in September 2010.[38][74] The JEM Exposed Facility also allows experiments to be exposed directly to space, serving as an external 'porch' for the Japanese Experiment Module complex,[75] as does the European Columbus laboratory, which provides mounting sites for experiments such as the European Technology Exposure Facility[76][77] and the Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space.[78]

Power supply

The ISS shown orbiting the Earth, with the blackness of space behind. In view are one of the large orange solar array wings at the top, a cluster of pressurised modules below, and four smaller, blue solar arrays projecting from the modules.
The ISS in 2001, showing the solar arrays on Zarya and Zvezda, in addition to the US P6 solar arrays.

The source of electrical power for the ISS is the Sun, with sunlight being converted into electricity through the use of solar arrays. The Russian segment of the station uses 28 volts DC (partly provided by four solar arrays mounted directly to Zarya and Zvezda), as does the space shuttle, but in the remainder of the station, electricity provided by the US solar arrays is distributed at a voltage ranging from 130 to 180 volts DC. These arrays are arranged as four pairs of wings, and each pair is capable of generating nearly 32.8 kW of DC power.[18]

Power is stabilised and distributed at 160 volts DC before being converted to the user-required 124 volts DC. This high-voltage distribution allows the use of electrical cables with a smaller diameter, thus reducing weight. Power can be shared between the two segments of the station using converters. This feature has become essential since the cancellation of the Russian Science Power Platform because the Russian Orbital Segment now depends on the US-built solar arrays for power.[79]

The US solar arrays normally track the Sun to maximise the amount of solar power. Each array is about 375 m2 (450 yd2) in area and 58 metres (190 ft) long. In the complete configuration, the solar arrays track the sun in each orbit by rotating the alpha gimbal, while the beta gimbal adjusts for the angle of the sun from the orbital plane. Until the main truss structure arrived, the arrays were in a temporary position perpendicular to the final orientation. In this configuration, the beta gimbal was used for the main solar tracking. Another tracking option, the Night Glider mode, can be used to reduce the effects of drag produced by the tenuous upper atmosphere, through which the station flies, by orienting the solar arrays edgewise to the velocity vector.[80]

Orbit control

The graph has a vaguely sawtoothed shape, with a deep valley in 2000 and a gentle descent in the average from 2003 onwards. See adjacent text for details.
Graph showing the changing altitude of the ISS from November 1998 until January 2006

The ISS is maintained at an orbit with a minimum altitude of 278 km (173 mi) to a maximum of 460 km (286 mi), and travels at an average speed of 27,724 kilometres (17,227 mi) per hour, completing 15.7 orbits per day.[19]. The normal maximum altitude is 425 km (264 mi) to allow Soyuz rendezvous missions. As the ISS constantly loses altitude because of slight atmospheric drag, it needs to be boosted to a higher altitude several times each year.[27][81] These effects vary from day to day, however, because of changes in the density of the outer atmosphere caused by changes in solar activity.[2] This reboost can be performed by the station's two main engines on the Zvezda service module, a docked space shuttle, a Progress resupply vessel, or by ESA's ATV. It takes approximately two orbits (three hours) to be boosted several kilometres higher.[81]

In December 2008 NASA signed an agreement with the Ad Astra Rocket Company which may result in the testing on the ISS of a VASIMR plasma propulsion engine.[82] This technology could, in the future, allow station-keeping to be done much more economically than at present.[83][84]

The attitude (orientation) of the station is maintained by either of two mechanisms. Normally, a system using several control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) keeps the station oriented, with Destiny forward of Unity, the P truss on the port side, and Pirs on the earth-facing (nadir) side. When the CMG system becomes saturated—a situation whereby a CMG exceeds its operational range or cannot track a series of rapid movements—it can lose its ability to control station attitude.[85] In this event, the Russian attitude control system is designed to take over automatically, using thrusters to maintain station attitude, allowing the CMG system to desaturate. This scenario has only occurred once, during Expedition 10.[86] When a space shuttle is docked to the station, it can also be used to maintain station attitude. This procedure was used during STS-117 as the S3/S4 truss was being installed.[87]

Microgravity

At the station's orbital altitude, the gravity from the Earth is 88% of that at sea level. The state of weightlessness is caused by the constant "free fall" of the ISS, which, because of the equivalence principle, is indiscernible from a state of zero gravity.[88] The environment on the station is, however, often described as microgravity, as the weightlessness is imperfect because of four effects:[89]

  • The drag resulting from the residual atmosphere.
  • Vibratory acceleration caused by mechanical systems and the crew on board the ISS.
  • Orbital corrections by the on-board gyroscopes or thrusters.
  • The spatial separation from the real centre of mass of the ISS—any part of the ISS not at the exact centre of mass will tend to follow its own orbit. However, as each point is physically part of the station, this is impossible, and so each component is subject to small accelerations from the forces, which keep them attached to the station as it orbits.[89] This is also called the tidal force.

Life support

A flowchart diagram showing the components of the ISS life support system. See adjacent text for details.
The interactions between the components of the ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS)

The ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) provides or controls elements such as atmospheric pressure, fire detection and suppression, oxygen levels, and water supply. The highest priority for the ECLSS is the ISS atmosphere, but the system also collects, processes, and stores waste and water produced and used by the crew. This process includes recycling fluid from the sink, shower, toilet, and condensation from the air. The Elektron system aboard Zvezda and a similar oxygen generation system in Destiny generate oxygen aboard the station.[90] If required, the crew has a backup option in the form of bottled oxygen and Solid Fuel Oxygen Generation (SFOG) canisters.[91] Carbon dioxide is removed from the air by the Vozdukh system in Zvezda. Other by-products of human metabolism, such as methane from the intestines and ammonia from sweat, are removed by activated charcoal filters.[91]

The atmosphere on board the ISS is maintained with a composition similar to that of the Earth's atmosphere.[92] Normal air pressure on the ISS is 101.3 kPa (14.7 psi);[93] the same as at sea level on Earth. An Earth like atmosphere offers benefits for crew comfort, and is much safer than the alternative, a pure oxygen atmosphere, because of the increased risk of fire, which was responsible for the deaths of the Apollo 1 crew.[94]

Sightings

A streak of light in a starry sky over some houses.
A July 2007 sighting of the International Space Station

Because of the size of the International Space Station (about that of an American football field) and the large reflective area offered by its solar panels, ground based observation of the station is possible with the naked eye if the observer is in the right location at the right time—in many cases, the station is one of the brightest naked-eye objects in the sky, although it is visible only for brief periods of time, ranging from two to five minutes.[7][95]

In order to view the station, the following conditions need to be fulfilled, assuming the weather is clear: The station must be above the observer's horizon, and it must pass within about 2000 km of the observing site (the closer the better); it must be dark enough at the observer's location for stars to be visible; and the station must be in sunlight rather than in the Earth's shadow. It is common for the third condition to begin or end during what would otherwise be a good viewing opportunity. In the evening, this will cause the station to suddenly fade and disappear as it moves further from the dusk, going from west to east. In the reverse situation, it may suddenly appear in the sky as it approaches the dawn.[7][96]

The station has now become bright enough to be seen during the day under certain conditions.[97]

Politics, utilisation and financing

A world map highlighting Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland in red and Brazil in pink. See adjacent text for details.
  Primary contributing nations
  NASA contracted nations

The ISS is a joint project among the space agencies of multiple nations. These consist of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Russian Federal Space Agency (RKA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and the European Space Agency (ESA).[20]

As a multinational project, the legal and financial aspects of the ISS are complex. Issues of concern include the ownership of modules, station utilisation by participating nations, and responsibilities for station resupply. The main legal document establishing obligations and rights between the ISS partners is the Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). This international treaty was signed on January 28, 1998 by the primary nations involved in the Space Station project; the United States of America, Russian Federation, Japan, Canada and ten member states of the European Space Agency (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland).[21] This set the stage for a second layer of agreements, called Memoranda of Understanding (MOU), between NASA and ESA, CSA, RKA and JAXA. These agreements are then further split, such as for the contractual obligations between nations, and trading of partners rights and obligations.[21] Use of the Russian Orbital Segment is also negotiated at this level.[22]

In addition to these main intergovernmental agreements, Brazil has a contract with NASA to supply hardware. In return, NASA will fly one Brazilian to the station during the ISS programme.[98] Italy has a similar contract with NASA to provide comparable services, although Italy also takes part in the programme directly via its membership in ESA.[99] China has reportedly expressed interest in the project, especially if it would be able to work with the RKA. However, as of 2009 China is not involved because of US objections.[100][101]

Utilisation rights

Four pie charts indicating how each part of the American segment of the ISS is allocated. See adjacent text for details.
Allocation of US-segment hardware between nations
A pie chart indicating the proportion of ISS crew members belonging to each space agency. See adjacent text for details.
ISS crew time utilisation by partner nations from March 2000 to September 2009

The Russian part of the station is operated and controlled by the Russian space agency and provides Russia with the right to nearly half of the crew time for the ISS (at a permanent crew of 6, on average 2-3 crew member spots are permanently allocated to Russia). The allocation of crew time (3-4 crew members of the total permanent ISS crew of 6) within the other sections of the station has been assigned as follows:

  • Columbus: 51% for ESA, 46.7% for NASA and 2.3% for CSA.[21]
  • Kibō: 51% for JAXA, 46.7% for NASA and 2.3% for CSA.[102]
  • Destiny: 97.7% for NASA and 2.3% for CSA.[103]
  • Crew time, electrical power and rights to purchase supporting services (such as data upload and download and communications) are divided 76.6% for NASA, 12.8% for JAXA, 8.3% for ESA, and 2.3% for CSA.[21][102][103]

Costs

The most cited figure of an overall cost estimate for the ISS ranges from 35 billion to 100 billion USD.[24] ESA, the only agency actually stating potential overall costs, estimates 100 billion for the entire station over a period of 30 years.[23] Giving a precise cost estimate for the ISS is not straightforward, as it is difficult to determine which costs should actually be attributed to the ISS programme, or how the Russian contribution should be measured.[24]

Criticism

The International Space Station has been the target of varied criticism over the years. Critics contend that the time and money spent on the ISS could be better spent on other projects—whether they be robotic spacecraft missions, space exploration, investigations of problems here on Earth, or just tax savings.[104] Some critics, such as Robert L. Park, argue that very little scientific research was convincingly planned for the ISS in the first place, and that the primary feature of a space-based laboratory, its microgravity environment, can be studied less expensively with a "vomit comet".[25][105]

The research capabilities of the ISS have been criticised, particularly following the cancellation of the ambitious Centrifuge Accommodations Module, which, alongside other equipment cancellations, means research done on the ISS is generally limited to experiments which do not require any specialized apparatus. For example, in the first half of 2007, ISS research dealt primarily with human biological responses to being in space, covering topics like kidney stones, circadian rhythm, and the effects of cosmic rays on the nervous system.[106][107][108] Other criticisms hinge on the technical design of the ISS, including the necessity for a high level of maintenance to be carried out by the crew, particularly via risky EVAs,[109] and the high inclination of the station's orbit, which leads to a higher cost for US-based launches to the station.[110]

In response to some of these comments, advocates of manned space exploration say that criticism of the ISS project is short-sighted, and that manned space research and exploration have produced billions of dollars' worth of tangible benefits to people on Earth. NASA has estimated that the indirect economic return from spin-offs of human space exploration has been many times the initial public investment, although this estimate is based on the Apollo program and was made in the 1970s.[111] A review of the claims by the Federation of American Scientists argued that NASA's rate of return from spin-offs is actually very low, except for aeronautics work that has led to aircraft sales.[112]

End of mission & deorbit plans

NASA currently plans to deorbit the ISS in the first quarter of 2016.[113] However, the plan for ending the ISS programme in 2015, as determined by former President George W. Bush has been increasingly questioned. Current NASA administrator Charles Bolden has stated that he thinks the lifetime of the International Space Station will be extended beyond 2016, the year that international funding for the station is currently set to end.[114][115] The Augustine Commission, which is currently reviewing NASA's human space flight program has voiced a strong recommendation to extend the ISS program to at least 2020 in their summary report issued on September 8, 2009.[116] In particular, Leroy Chiao, a former space station commander and space shuttle astronaut who sat on the advisory panel, is quoted in a CNN interview as stating, “You've got all of these different countries working together on this common project in space. And if we go ahead and stop [...] it's going to break up that framework. The different countries around the world will lose confidence in the US as a leader in space exploration." NASA officials are awaiting a decision from the Obama administration on the future direction of the ISS in particular and the human spaceflight programme in general.[117]

NASA has the responsibility for deorbiting the ISS. Although Zvezda has a propulsion system used for station keeping, it is not powerful enough for a controlled deorbit. Options for controlled deorbit of the ISS include using a modified European Automated Transfer Vehicle or a specially constructed deorbit vehicle.[118][119]

A 2009-report stated that RKK Energia is looking at ways to remove some Russian modules from the station when the end of mission is reached and use them as a basis for a new station, known as the Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex. The modules that would be removed from the current ISS include the Multipurpose Laboratory Module (MLM), which is currently scheduled to be launched at the end of 2011, and other Russian modules which are currently planned to be attached to the MLM until 2015, which however have not yet received funding. Neither the MLM nor any additional modules attached to it would have reached the end of their useful lives in 2016 or 2020. The report quotes an unnamed Russian engineer stated that experience from Mir indicates that, except for micrometeorite damage, a thirty year life should be possible, given that the Russian modules have been built with on-orbit refurbishment in mind.[120]

Life on board

Sleeping in space

An astronaut emerges from a small sleeping compartment surrounded by equipment.
Astronaut Peggy Whitson in the doorway of a sleeping rack in the Destiny laboratory

The station provides crew quarters for each member of permanent Expedition crews, with two 'sleep stations' in the Russian Orbital Segment and four spread around the rest of the station, which will eventually be moved into Tranquillity when it is added to the station. The US quarters are private, approximately person-sized soundproof booth modules. A crewmember can sleep in them in a tethered sleeping bag, relax, listen to music, use a laptop, and store personal effects in a large drawer or in nets attached to the module's walls. The module also provides a reading lamp, a shelf and a desktop.[121][122][123] Visiting crews, who have no allocated sleep module, simply attach a sleeping bag to an available space on a wall - it is perfectly possible to sleep floating freely through the station, but this is generally avoided because of the possibility of drifting through the station and bumping into sensitive equipment.[124] However, it is important that crew accommodations are well ventilated, as warm air does not rise in space. This means that astronauts can end up waking up gasping for air as they have become oxygen deprived because of a bubble of their own exhaled carbon dioxide forming around their heads.[123]

Hygiene

Since the removal of the Habitation module from the station's design, the ISS has not featured a shower. Instead, crewmembers wash using a water jet and wet wipes, with soap dispensed from a toothpaste tube-like container. Crews are also provided with rinseless shampoo and edible toothpaste to save water.[125]

There are two space toilets on the ISS, both of Russian design, located in Zvezda and Harmony. These Waste and Hygiene Compartments use a fan-driven suction system similar to the Space Shuttle Waste Collection System. Astronauts first fasten themselves to the toilet seat, which is equipped with spring-loaded restraining bars to ensure a good seal.[123] A lever operates a powerful fan and a suction hole slides open: the air stream carries the waste neatly away. Solid waste is collected in individual micro-perforated bags which are stored in an aluminium container. Full containers are transferred to Progress spacecraft for disposal.[121][126] Liquid waste is evacuated by a hose connected to the front of the toilet, with anatomically correct “urine funnel adapters” attached to the tube so both men and women can use the same toilet. Waste is collected and transferred to the Water Recovery System, where it is recycled back into drinking water.[122]

Food & drink

Thirteen astronauts seated around a table covered in open cans of food strapped down to the table. In the background a selection of equipment is visible, as well as the salmon-coloured walls of the Unity node.
The crews of STS-127 and Expedition 20 enjoy a meal inside Unity.

Most of the food eaten by station crews is frozen, refrigerated or canned, with menus selected by the astronauts, with the help of a dietitian, prior to their arrival on the station.[122] As the sense of taste is reduced in orbit because of fluid shifting to the head, spicy food is a favourite of many crews.[123] Each crewmember has their food packages identified by means of a coloured label, and cooks them using the onboard galley, which features two food warmers, a refrigerator, and a water dispenser (which provides both heated and unheated water).[121] Drinks are provided dehydrated in powder form, and are mixed with water (some of which is recycled from the crew's urine[121][127]) before consumption.[122] Drinks and soups are sipped from plastic bags with straws, whilst solid food is eaten with a knife and fork, which are attached to a tray with magnets to prevent them floating away. Any food which does float away, including crumbs, must be collected to prevent it clogging up the station's air filters and other equipment.[122]

Crew schedule

The time zone used on board the ISS is Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, sometimes informally called GMT). The windows are covered at night hours to give the impression of darkness because the station experiences 16 sunrises and sunsets a day. During visiting space shuttle missions, the ISS crew will mostly follow the shuttle's Mission Elapsed Time (MET), which is a flexible time zone based on the launch time of the shuttle mission.[128][129] Because the sleeping periods between the UTC time zone and the MET usually differ, the ISS crew often has to adjust its sleeping pattern before the space shuttle arrives and after it leaves to shift from one time zone to the other in a practice known as sleep shifting.[130]

A typical day for the crew begins with a wake-up at 06:00, followed by post-sleep activities and a morning inspection of the station. The crew then eats breakfast and takes part in a daily planning conference with Mission Control on the ground before starting work at around 08:10. The first scheduled exercise of the day follows, after which the crew continues work until 13:05. Following a one-hour lunch break, the afternoon consists of more exercise and work before the crew carries out its pre-sleep activities beginning at 19:30, including dinner and a crew conference. The scheduled sleep period begins at 21:30, when the daily schedule is complete. In general, the crew works 10 hours per day on a weekday, and 5 hours on Saturdays, with the rest of the time being their own for relaxation, games or work catch-up.[131]

Station operations

Expeditions

Each permanent station crew is given a sequential Expedition number: Expedition 1, Expedition 2, and so on. Expeditions have an average duration of half a year, and they commence following the official handover of the station from one Expedition commander to another. Expeditions 1 through 6 consisted of three person crews, but the Columbia accident led to a reduction to two crew members from Expeditions 7 to 12. Expedition 13 saw the restoration of the station crew to three, and the station has been permanently staffed as such since. While only three crew members are permanently on the station, however, several expeditions, such as Expedition 16, have consisted of up to six individual astronauts or cosmonauts, with individuals being flown up and down to the station on individual flights.[132][133]

On May 27, 2009, the current expedition to ISS Expedition 20 began. Expedition 20 is the first ISS crew of six. Before the expansion of the living volume and capabilities from STS-115 the station could only host a crew of three. Expedition 20's crew was lifted to the station in two separate Soyuz-TMA flights launched at two different times (each Soyuz-TMA can hold only three people): Soyuz TMA-14 on March 26, 2009 and Soyuz TMA-15 on May 27, 2009. However, the station will not be permanently occupied by six crew members during all 52 weeks of the year. For example, when the Expedition 20 crew (Roman Romanenko, Frank De Winne and Bob Thirsk) returns to Earth in November 2009, for a period of about two weeks only two crew members (Jeff Williams and Max Surayev) will be aboard. This will increase to five in early December, when another Soyuz, carrying Oleg Kotov, Timothy Creamer and Soichi Noguchi arrives. It will then decrease to three when Williams and Surayev depart in March 2010, returning to six in April 2010 with the launch of the next three-person Soyuz.[132][133]

The International Space Station is the most-visited spacecraft in the history of space flight. As of 6 September 2009, it has had 257 non-distinct visitors comprising 180 individual people.[8] Mir had 137 non-distinct visitors.[15]

Visiting spacecraft

A space shuttle, with its payload bay full of equipment, seen orbiting over a cloudy sky above a mountainous region of the Earth.
The Space Shuttle Endeavour approaching the ISS during STS-118

Spacecraft from four different space agencies visit the International Space Station, serving a variety of purposes. The Automated Transfer Vehicle from the European Space Agency and the H-II Transfer Vehicle from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency have provided resupply services to the station. Also serving the station in this capacity is the Russian Roskosmos Progress spacecraft. In addition, Russia supplies a Soyuz spacecraft used for crew rotation and emergency evacuation, which is replaced every six months. Finally, the US services the ISS through its Space Shuttle programme. Space shuttle missions provide resupply missions, assembly and logistics flights, and crew rotation. As of 15 October 2009, there have been 20 Soyuz, 35 Progress, 1 ATV, 1 HTV and 30 Space Shuttle flights to the station.[1] Expeditions require, on average, 2,722 kg of supplies, and as of 28 March 2009, crews had consumed a total of 19,000 meals.[1] Soyuz crew rotation flights and Progress resupply flights visit the station on average two and three times respectively each year,[134] with the ATV and HTV planned to visit annually from 2010 onwards.

As of 30 October 2009, there are three spacecraft docked with the ISS:[134]

Mission control centres

As an international project, the components of the ISS are operated and monitored by their respective space agencies at control centres across the globe, including:

A world map highlighting the locations of space centres. See adjacent text for details.
Space centres involved with the ISS programme

Safety aspects

Orbital debris

An image of a flat metallic structure with a half-inch hole punched through it. A ruler is visible to demonstrate scale.
The entry hole in Space Shuttle Endeavour's radiator panel caused by space debris during STS-118.

At the low altitudes at which the ISS orbits, there is a variety of space debris, consisting of everything from entire spent rocket stages and defunct satellites, to explosion fragments, paint flakes, slag from solid rocket motors, coolant released by RORSAT nuclear powered satellites, deliberate insertion of small needles, and many other objects.[138] These objects, in addition to natural micrometeoroids,[139] pose a threat to the station as they have the ability to puncture the pressurised modules and cause damage to other parts of the station.[140][141] Micrometeoroids also pose a risk to spacewalking astronauts, as such objects could puncture their spacesuit and cause it to depressurise, exposing them directly to the space environment.[142]

Space debris objects are tracked remotely from the ground, and the station crew can be notified of any objects with sufficient size to cause damage on impact. This allows for a Debris Avoidance Manoeuvre (DAM) to be conducted, which uses thrusters on the Russian Orbital Segment to alter the station's orbital altitude in order to avoid the debris. DAMs are not uncommon, taking place if computational models show the debris will approach within a certain threat distance.[140]

However, if a threat from orbital debris is identified too late for a DAM to be safely conducted, the station crew close all the hatches aboard the station and retreat into their Soyuz spacecraft, so that they would be able to evacuate the station in the event it was damaged by the debris. This partial station evacuation has occurred twice, on 6 April 2003 and 13 March 2009.[140]

Radiation

Without the protection of the Earth's atmosphere, astronauts are exposed to high levels of radiation through a steady flux of cosmic rays. Station crews are subjected to about 1 millisievert of radiation per day, which is about the same as someone would get from natural sources on Earth in a whole year, with three months' exposure roughly equaling 10% of the increased cancer risk caused by regular smoking.[143] This results in a high risk of astronauts developing cancer. High levels of radiation can create 'chromosomal aberrations' in blood lymphocytes. These cells are heavily involved in the immune system and so any damage may contribute to the lowered immunity experienced by astronauts. Over time immunodeficiency results in the rapid spread of infection between crew members, especially in such confined areas. Radiation has also been linked to a higher incidence of cataracts in astronauts. Protective shielding and protective drugs may lower the risks to an acceptable level, but data is scarce and longer-term exposure will result in greater risks.[32]

Despite efforts to improve radiation shielding on the ISS compared to previous stations such as Mir, radiation levels within the station have not been vastly reduced, and it is thought that further technological advancement will be required in order to make long-duration human spaceflight further into the Solar System a possibility.[143]

References

  1. ^ a b c NASA (June 10, 2009). "The ISS to Date". NASA. Retrieved October 15, 2009.
  2. ^ a b "ISS Height Profile". Heavens-Above.com. Retrieved October 15, 2007.
  3. ^ a b c d NASA (May 29, 2009). "On-Orbit Elements" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved October 24, 2008.
  4. ^ Chris Peat (September 15, 2009). "ISS—Orbit Data". Heavens-Above.com. Retrieved September 16, 2009.
  5. ^ Steven Siceloff (February 1, 2001). "NASA Yields to Use of Alpha Name for Station". Florida Today. Retrieved January 18, 2009. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  6. ^ Rand Simberg (July 29, 2008). "The Uncertain Future of the International Space Station: Analysis". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  7. ^ a b c NASA (July 2, 2008). "International Space Station Sighting Opportunities". NASA. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
  8. ^ a b c d "Nations Around the World Mark 10th Anniversary of International Space Station". NASA. November 17, 2008. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  9. ^ a b "International Space Station Overview". ShuttlePressKit.com. June 3, 1999. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  10. ^ a b c d e "Fields of Research". NASA. June 26, 2007. Archived from the original on March 25, 2008. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; January 23, 2008 suggested (help)
  11. ^ a b "Getting on Board". NASA. June 26, 2007. Archived from the original on December 8, 2007.
  12. ^ a b c "ISS Research Program". NASA. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  13. ^ "We've Only Just Begun". NASA. June 26, 2008. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  14. ^ a b "Expedition 21". NASA. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h David Harland (November 30, 2004). The Story of Space Station Mir. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. ISBN 978-0-387-23011-5.
  16. ^ a b John E, Catchpole (June 17, 2008). The International Space Station: Building for the Future. Springer-Praxis. ISBN 978-0387781440.
  17. ^ a b Kim Dismukes (April 4, 2004). "Shuttle–Mir History/Background/How "Phase 1" Started". NASA. Retrieved April 12, 2007.
  18. ^ a b c "Spread Your Wings, It's Time to Fly". NASA. July 26, 2006. Retrieved September 21, 2006.
  19. ^ a b NASA (December 15, 2008). "Current ISS Tracking data". NASA. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
  20. ^ a b "Human Spaceflight and Exploration—European Participating States". European Space Agency (ESA). 2009. Retrieved January 17, 2009.
  21. ^ a b c d e f "ISS Intergovernmental Agreement". European Space Agency (ESA). April 19, 2009. Retrieved April 19, 2009.
  22. ^ a b "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Russian Space Agency Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. January 29, 1998. Retrieved April 19, 2009.
  23. ^ a b "How Much Does It Cost?". European Space Agency (ESA). August 9, 2005. Retrieved March 27, 2008.
  24. ^ a b c Alan Boyle (August 25, 2006). "What's the cost of the space station?". MSNBC. Retrieved September 30, 2008.
  25. ^ a b Robert L. Park. "Space Station: Maybe They Could Use It to Test Missile Defense". Retrieved March 23, 2009.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h i Gary Kitmacher (2006). Reference Guide to the International Space Station. Canada: Apogee Books. pp. 71–80. ISBN 978-1-894959-34-6. ISSN 1496-6921.
  27. ^ a b c James Oberg (2005). "International Space Station". World Book Online Reference Center. World Book, Inc. Retrieved June 14, 2008.
  28. ^ "The International Space Station: life in space". Science in School. December 10, 2008. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  29. ^ Chris Bergin (August 22, 2009). "ISS: Still in assembly, producing science research accomplishments". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  30. ^ "What Is ISS: International Space Station?". Astronomy Expert. September 24, 2008. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  31. ^ "NASA Authorization Act 2005" (PDF). United States Government Printing Office. December 30, 2005. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  32. ^ a b Jay Buckey (February 23, 2006). Space Physiology. OUP USA. ISBN 978-0-19-513725-5.
  33. ^ Brooke Boen (May 1, 2009). "Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity (ADUM)". NASA. Retrieved October 1, 2009.
  34. ^ Sishir Rao; et al. (2008). "A Pilot Study of Comprehensive Ultrasound Education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine". Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 27: 745–749. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  35. ^ Michael Fincke; et al. (2004). "Evaluation of Shoulder Integrity in Space: First Report of Musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station". Radiology (234): 319–322. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  36. ^ "Materials Science 101". Science@NASA. September 15, 1999. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
  37. ^ Donna Heivilin (June 21, 1994). "Space Station: Impact of the Expanded Russian Role on Funding and Research" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. Retrieved November 3, 2006.
  38. ^ a b c d e NASA (2008). "Consolidated Launch Manifest". NASA. Retrieved July 8, 2008.
  39. ^ a b c d "HSF: ISS assembly sequence and on-orbit configuration". European Space Agency (ESA). Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  40. ^ Chris Bergin (July 26, 2005). "Discovery launches—The Shuttle is back". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  41. ^ Mark Wade (July 15, 2008). "ISS Zarya". Encyclopaedia Astronautica. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
  42. ^ "Unity Connecting Module: Cornerstone for a Home in Orbit" (PDF). NASA. January 1999. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
  43. ^ "Zvezda Service Module". NASA. March 11, 2009. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
  44. ^ Chris Jones (2008). Too Far from Home. Vintage. ISBN 978-0-09-951324-7.
  45. ^ "NASA—US Destiny Laboratory". NASA. March 26, 2007. Retrieved June 26, 2007.
  46. ^ "Space Station Extravehicular Activity". NASA. April 4, 2004. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
  47. ^ "Pirs Docking Compartment". NASA. May 10, 2006. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
  48. ^ "Harmony Node 2". NASA. September 26, 2007. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
  49. ^ Chris Bergin (January 10, 2008). "PRCB plan STS-122 for NET Feb 7—three launches in 10–11 weeks". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved January 12, 2008.
  50. ^ "Columbus laboratory". European Space Agency (ESA). January 10, 2009. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  51. ^ a b "NASA—Kibo Japanese Experiment Module". NASA. November 23, 2007. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
  52. ^ "About Kibo". Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). September 25, 2008. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  53. ^ Anatoly Zak. "Docking Compartment-1 and 2". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Retrieved March 26, 2009.
  54. ^ Chris Bergin (November 10, 2009). "Russian module launches via Soyuz for Thursday ISS docking". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved November 10, 2009.
  55. ^ Robert Z. Pearlman (April 15, 2009). "NASA Names Space Module After Moon Base, Not Stephen Colbert". Space.com. Retrieved April 15, 2009.
  56. ^ "Node 3: Connecting Module". European Space Agency (ESA). February 23, 2009. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
  57. ^ "Cupola". European Space Agency (ESA). January 16, 2009. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
  58. ^ Gebhardt, Chris (2009-08-05). "STS-133 refined to a five crew, one EVA mission—will leave MPLM on ISS". NASAspaceflight.com.
  59. ^ Amos, Jonathan (2009-08-29). "Europe looks to buy Soyuz craft". BBC News.
  60. ^ "Shuttle Q&A Part 5". NASASpaceflight.com. September 27, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
  61. ^ "FGB-based Multipurpose Lab Module (MLM)". Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Centre. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved October 31, 2008.
  62. ^ "Where is the Centrifuge Accommodation Module (CAM)?". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
  63. ^ Tariq Malik (February 14, 2006). "NASA Recycles Former ISS Module for Life Support Research". Space.com. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
  64. ^ E. D. Graf (February 2000). "The X-38 and Crew Return Vehicle Programmes" (PDF). ESA Bulletin 101. European Space Agency. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  65. ^ "ICM Interim Control Module". US Naval Center for Space Technology. Retrieved October 10, 2009.
  66. ^ a b Anatoly Zak. "Russian segment of the ISS". russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved October 3, 2009.
  67. ^ "Russian Research Modules". Boeing. Retrieved June 21, 2009.
  68. ^ "The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Experiment". CERN. January 21, 2009. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  69. ^ "International Space Station". CSA. March 9, 2006. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  70. ^ Chris Bergin (January 27, 2009). "NASA approve funding to leave OBSS permanently on the ISS". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved October 5, 2009.
  71. ^ "ERA: European Robotic Arm". ESA. Retrieved October 4, 2009. {{cite web}}: Text "date-January 16, 2009" ignored (help)
  72. ^ "Remote Manipulator System:About Kibo". JAXA. August 29, 2008. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  73. ^ "International Space Station Status Report #02-03". NASA. January 14, 2002. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  74. ^ "EXPRESS Racks 1 and 2 fact sheet". April 12, 2008. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  75. ^ "Exposed Facility:About Kibo". JAXA. August 29, 2008. Retrieved October 9, 2009.
  76. ^ "NASA - European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF)". NASA. 6 October 2008. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
  77. ^ "ESA - Columbus - European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF)". ESA. 13 January 2009. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
  78. ^ "Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space (ACES)". ESA. Retrieved October 9, 2009.
  79. ^ "Boeing: Integrated Defense Systems—NASA Systems—International Space Station—Solar Power". Boeing. November 2, 2006. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
  80. ^ Landis, G & Lu, C-Y (1991). "Solar Array Orientation Options for a Space Station in Low Earth Orbit". Journal of Propulsion and Power. 7 (1): 123–125. doi:10.2514/3.23302.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. ^ a b "ISS Environment". Johnson Space Center. Archived from the original on February 13, 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2007.
  82. ^ "Ad Astra To Fly VASIMR Engine on ISS". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved May 29, 2009.
  83. ^ "Propulsion Systems of the Future". NASA. Retrieved May 29, 2009.
  84. ^ David Shiga (October 5, 2009). "Rocket company tests world's most powerful ion engine". New Scientist. Retrieved October 7, 2009.
  85. ^ Carlos Roithmayr (2003). Dynamics and Control of Attitude, Power, and Momentum for a Spacecraft Using Flywheels and Control Moment Gyroscopes. Langley Research Centre: NASA.
  86. ^ "International Space Station Status Report #05-7". NASA. February 11, 2005. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
  87. ^ Chris Bergin (June 14, 2007). "Atlantis ready to support ISS troubleshooting". NASASPaceflight.com. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
  88. ^ "Microgravity" (aspx). British National Space Council. August 3, 2009. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
  89. ^ a b "European Users Guide to Low Gravity Platforms" (PDF). European Space Agency. December 6, 2005. Retrieved May 16, 2006.
  90. ^ Tariq Malik (February 15, 2006). "Air Apparent: New Oxygen Systems for the ISS". Space.com. Retrieved November 21, 2008.
  91. ^ a b Patrick L. Barry (November 13, 2000). "Breathing Easy on the Space Station". NASA. Retrieved November 21, 2008.
  92. ^ Freudenrich, Ph.D., Craig (November 20, 2000). "How Space Stations Work". Howstuffworks. Retrieved November 23, 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  93. ^ "5–8: The Air Up There". NASAexplores. NASA. Archived from the original on November 14, 2006. Retrieved October 31, 2008.
  94. ^ Clinton Anderson (January 30, 1968). Report of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences, United States Senate—Apollo 204 Accident (PDF). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. p. 8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  95. ^ "Space Station Observation". Highlights from Horton Bluff. December 4, 2006. Retrieved May 28, 2009.
  96. ^ European Space Agency (January 7, 2009). "See the ISS from your home town". European Space Agency. Retrieved November 13, 2007.
  97. ^ Spaceweather.com (June 5, 2009). "ISS visible during the daytime". Spaceweather.com. Retrieved June 5, 2009.
  98. ^ "NASA Signs International Space Station Agreement With Brazil". NASA. October 14, 1997. Retrieved January 18, 2009.
  99. ^ "International Space Station (ISS)". Italian Space Agency. January 18, 2009. Retrieved January 18, 2009.
  100. ^ "China wants role in space station". CNN. Associated Press. October 16, 2007. Archived from the original on March 14, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2008.
  101. ^ James Oberg (October 26, 2001). "China takes aim at the space station". MSNBC. Retrieved January 30, 2009.
  102. ^ a b "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Government of Japan Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. February 24, 1998. Retrieved April 19, 2009.
  103. ^ a b "Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States of America and the Canadian Space Agency Concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station". NASA. January 29, 1998. Retrieved April 19, 2009.
  104. ^ "A waste of space". Mail & Guardian. M&G Media. Retrieved March 15, 2009.
  105. ^ Bob Park. "Space: International Space Station Unfurls New Solar Panels". Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  106. ^ NASA (2007). "Renal Stone Risk During Spaceflight: Assessment and Countermeasure Validation (Renal Stone)". NASA. Retrieved November 13, 2007.
  107. ^ NASA (2007). "Sleep-Wake Actigraphy and Light Exposure During Spaceflight-Long (Sleep-Long)". NASA. Retrieved November 13, 2007.
  108. ^ NASA (2007). "Anomalous Long Term Effects in Astronauts' Central Nervous System (ALTEA)". NASA. Retrieved November 13, 2007.
  109. ^ Jeff Foust (2005). "The trouble with space stations". The Space Review. Retrieved March 23, 2009.
  110. ^ James J. Secosky, George Musser (1996). "Up, Up, and Away". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved September 10, 2006.
  111. ^ Ginzburg, E.; Kuhn, J. W.; Schnee, J.; Yavitz, B. (1976). "Economic impact of large public programs The NASA experience". NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). Retrieved November 13, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  112. ^ Federation of American Scientists. "NASA Technological Spinoff Fables". Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved September 17, 2006.
  113. ^ "As Space Station Nears Completion, It Faces End of Mission". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  114. ^ "New NASA boss: Astronauts on Mars in his lifetime". Mercury News. July 21, 2009. Retrieved August 9, 2009.
  115. ^ "De-Orbit the ISS in 2016? Don't Bet On It". UniverseToday. July 15, 2009. Retrieved August 28, 2009.
  116. ^ Gen. Norman Augustine; et al. (September 8, 2009). "Summary Report of the Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee" (PDF). Retrieved September 25, 2009. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  117. ^ Rich Phillips (October 14, 2009). "How much longer will the space station fly? (CNN)". Retrieved October 14, 2009.
  118. ^ Rob Coppinger (March 7, 2007). "NASA may buy ESA's ATV to de-orbit ISS at end of life". Flightglobal. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  119. ^ Thomas Kelly; et al. (2000). Engineering Challenges to the Long-Term Operation of the International Space Station. National Academies Press. pp. 28–30. ISBN 0-309-06938-6. {{cite book}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  120. ^ "Russia 'to save its ISS modules'". BBC News. May 22, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2009.
  121. ^ a b c d Cheryl L. Mansfield (November 7, 2008). "Station Prepares for Expanding Crew". NASA. Retrieved September 17, 2009.
  122. ^ a b c d e "Living and Working on the International Space Station" (PDF). CSA. Retrieved October 28, 2009.
  123. ^ a b c d "Daily life". ESA. July 19, 2004. Retrieved October 28, 2009.
  124. ^ Tariq Malik (July 27, 2009). "Sleeping in Space is Easy, But There's No Shower". Space.com. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
  125. ^ Tariq Malik (July 27, 2009). "Sleeping in Space is Easy, But There's No Shower". Space.com. {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help); Text "http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/090827-sts127-space-sleeping.html" ignored (help)
  126. ^ Ed Lu (September 8, 2003). ""Greetings Earthling"". NASA. Retrieved November 1, 2009.
  127. ^ "Astronauts at International Space Station sip water recycled from urine". Mosnews.com. May 21, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
  128. ^ "Mission Elapsed Time explained". NASA. September 13, 1995. Retrieved November 9, 2007.
  129. ^ "Ask the STS-113 crew: Question 14". NASA. December 7, 2002. Retrieved November 9, 2007.
  130. ^ "STS-113 Mission and Expedition Crew Question and Answer Board". NASA. November 2002. Retrieved February 24, 2009.
  131. ^ "ISS Crew Timeline" (PDF). NASA. November 5, 2008. Retrieved November 5, 2008.
  132. ^ a b "International Space Station Expeditions". NASA. April 10, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2009.
  133. ^ a b NASA (2008). "International Space Station". NASA. Retrieved October 22, 2008.
  134. ^ a b "Live listing of spacecraft operations". NASA. September 11, 2009. Retrieved September 14, 2009.
  135. ^ "Soyuz TMA-15 launches for growing ISS—UPA/SPDM updates". May 27, 2009. Retrieved September 14, 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |publicjer= ignored (help)
  136. ^ Justin Ray (October 14, 2009). "Latest freighter heads for International Space Station". Spaceflight Now.
  137. ^ Justin Ray (October 17, 2009). "Cargo ship arrives at the International Space Station". Spaceflight Now.
  138. ^ Michael Hoffman (April 3, 2009). "National Space Symposium 2009:It's getting crowded up there". Defense News. Retrieved October 7, 2009.
  139. ^ F. L. Whipple (1949). "The Theory of Micrometeoroids". Popular Astronomy. 57: 517.
  140. ^ a b c Chris Bergin (September 30, 2009). "Soyuz TMA-16 launches for journey to ISS – Safe Haven evaluations". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved October 7, 2009.
  141. ^ Henry Nahra (April 24–29, 1989). "Effect of Micrometeoroid and Space Debris Impacts on the Space Station Freedom Solar Array Surfaces" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved October 7, 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  142. ^ Leonard David (January 7, 2002). "Space Junk and ISS: A Threatening Problem". Space.com. Retrieved November 30, 2008.
  143. ^ a b Eugenie Samuel (October 23, 2002). "Space station radiation shields 'disappointing". New Scientist. Retrieved October 7, 2009.

{{{inline}}}

Official International Space Station webpages of the participating space agencies
Interactive/Multimedia

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA