Jump to content

User talk:Nakon/arc7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArmzJoynulmiah (talk | contribs) at 21:20, 28 February 2010 (→‎Page deleted in "ArmzJoynulmiah" for no reason: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

To add a new message, click HERE
Archives
1 :: 2 :: 3 :: 4 :: 5 :: 6

Someone needs to get rid of the Asshole vandalizing this page.

I've blocked the IP address. Nakon 22:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please revoke his talkpage editing privileges? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you reverted this article to a previous one. However, I believe you reverted it to a vandalised version (about myself), as the version before is about an American politician. Could you please correct this? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meatball893 (talkcontribs) 01:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for failing to notice this. I have reverted the article back to a hopefully stable version. Nakon 01:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meatball893 (talkcontribs) 01:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parsing of CDA

Neat!

Of course, we can see already that a few editors are using the analysis (or ones like it) to suggest that the proposal is being killed by the big bad admins. (Full disclosure — I'm a big bad admin, and I've voted against the proposal.)

I'm wondering how readily one might generate an alternate analysis of the voters — perhaps the median number of edits, or average age of account? Are the editors who are opposed to the proposal more experienced than those who support it? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a section comparing the edit counts of the supporters against the opposers. Nakon 20:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps instead of just giving the percentages for admins/nonadmins as a total percentage of the vote, you could do it as a percentage of those expressing a preference. Otherwise it is a little misleading, no? 1/1/1 comes out as 33.3 percent support.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

I request you to delete [[1]]. Thank you immediately. --Žiedas (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the page. Nakon 21:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mukadota again too please, CTJF83 GoUSA 21:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you recently deleted everything on my page

it was a table i was using for a game i'm hosting on another site to show who was eliminated, etc., since i didn't know where else i could make it. it wasn't just nonsense, it did actually have. a meaning.

any chance you could let me know how i could find it again if that's possible, and also let me know if there's a better place i could put it so it won't get deleted (such as my talk page)? ZimsNewBFF (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a personal web host. Please find another site to host your content. Nakon 22:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you go to my page, you will see in the left column, "email this user". If you need the data, email me and I will go get it and email it to you. Is it your user page?--Wehwalt (talk) 01:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Walters

Hi, I removed your prod on Chris Walters as the author's talk page comment indicates that deletion is not uncontroversial. I have opened an AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Walters. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent block

Hi Nakon - I don't think you should have blocked the IP who posted WP:AN/I#Please block me at once. It sounded to me like a prank where the prankster has now gotten a "friend"'s computer blocked. Comet Tuttle (talk) 19:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then his "friend" should have better policed his computer. Nakon 20:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

stats on voters on CDA

Could you add a detail line to each voter showing # of edits and first edit date? For example:

  1. John Doe, 9365, 2008-4-12

Comma separated would be especially useful. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Thanks for adding the average account edits and average account ages — that was a quick response to my request!) I'm wondering if the averages tend to get skewed (particularly for edit count) by a few outliers. The mean edit count gets shifted up or down by thousands if we have just a few dedicated Hugglers on one side or the other. I'm not sure exactly what crunching tools you have ready access to, but numbers like median (rather than mean) number of edits, and maybe inter-quartile or inter-quintile bounds could be interesting. Per Hammersoft's request, a comma-separated list including the edit counts and account ages would also work — when I've got some free time I could crunch the numbers myself in a spreadsheet. Cheers! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 22:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the script. It appears that a few of the users' profiles are corrupted/missing in the toolserver database. Nakon 00:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All users should now be properly parsed. Nakon 00:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An idea for your script

I'd like to see a further breakdown:

CRGreathouse (t | c) 06:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added that breakdown to the script. Nakon 20:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page deleted in "ArmzJoynulmiah" for no reason

I have reasonly added a "rv" sign which wikipedia has told me to revert my article on user's profile. Because of someone called "EIRecordz" who has deleted my page for no reason with vandalism included. So I would love to my page back to the wikipedia article community and let people/members read the articles that I have created. I have to along time creating my article and I would love to have it back into my profile. Please check the user called "EIRecordz" who has joined in the 28th february, 2010 and please banned or suspend that user who has vandalised my article and removed it for no reason, I would like you to restore my article back into the site of wikipedia.