User talk:Coramandel23

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Narsapurlutheran.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMG 1372.JPG. The copy called Image:IMG 1372.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion and continued sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 04:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was creating new accounts was because every account I created was being blocked, this is despite the fact that I have been making significant contributions to the talk page and discussion through my so called "socks". I have also refrained from any type of edit warring. I hope the administrators will take an uninterested stand and promote divergent view points. Please unblock at least one account. I have much to contribute to wikipedia. Thank you

Decline reason:

That does not excuse dodging your block, regardless of the merits of it. The proper recourse in that case would have been to file an unblock request, not create a sock (since the latter tends to destroy, or at the very least badly damage, any hope of getting yourself unblocked). —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 06:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.